Ok ... SERIOUSLY!?

This is outstanding !!!!!

The artist is amazing,

What's the difference between the two posts?

They're identical, the only difference is that this one's frames go in reverse order from the parent post. Look closely at the heads in both gifs.

I don't know why anybody would reverse it, it's such an insignificant detail that's barely perceptible. This should be removed.

limewedge said:
They're identical, the only difference is that this one's frames go in reverse order from the parent post. Look closely at the heads in both gifs.

I don't know why anybody would reverse it, it's such an insignificant detail that's barely perceptible. This should be removed.

I don't see why they both can't stay. I actually prefer the animation going this way

limewedge said:
They're identical, the only difference is that this one's frames go in reverse order from the parent post. Look closely at the heads in both gifs.

I don't know why anybody would reverse it, it's such an insignificant detail that's barely perceptible. This should be removed.

it's not the same, therefore it has no reason to be removed.

limewedge said:
I don't know why anybody would reverse it

"I reversed the same gif, and it’s looking as good as the first one. So t’s 2 in 1 deal" -Eto_Ya's Tumblr Post of this Gif.

limewedge said:
They're identical, the only difference is that this one's frames go in reverse order from the parent post. Look closely at the heads in both gifs.

I don't know why anybody would reverse it, it's such an insignificant detail that's barely perceptible. This should be removed.

Please refer to the source; The creator themselves reversed it and posted both versions. It was intended as a separate piece.

I'd argue the appearance of her grinding towards or away from the viewer is enough to justify allowing both.

limewedge said:
They're identical, the only difference is that this one's frames go in reverse order from the parent post. Look closely at the heads in both gifs.

I don't know why anybody would reverse it, it's such an insignificant detail that's barely perceptible. This should be removed.

Its kinda a huge difference entirely, and this version is way better. Not to mention the op was the artist.

If this was just edit that some random made by clicking reverse button, I would be hitting my delet button so hard that table beneath it would break in the process.

When it's done by artist themselves, that does change situation a bit because now it's alternate version and not edit as far as sites guidelines consider it.

Just because artists made some variation, doesn't mean it's automatically acceptable. That's partially reason why alternate version available tag exists, stating there's other versions which aren't here for some reason.

I guess the idea that even I had trouble telling which version is actually reversed makes this one worth keeping in this case.

Jesus, why the downvotes. I was genuinely curious what the difference was since I couldn't see a change between them

glad I can save this before I have to pay for site access (rip net neutrality)
weve got a good half year to get saving