created by keadanger
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • One of the few SCPs that are controversial less for the Sueishness of the skip and more for the out-of-universe issues.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • bongani said:
    One of the few SCPs that are controversial less for the Sueishness of the skip and more for the out-of-universe issues.

    ngl this SCP has me confused.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Is this SCP Canon? Cause I just spent a good 25 minutes and dug up two sources.
    One: is the canon SCP-1926 which does not mention this at all, I think, I skimmed it.
    and
    Two: THIS version of SCP-1926.

    My mind is confused not only because of the mention and/or image of this bunny doll. But The entire site as a whole. Is this some kind of fansite version of SCP Foundation and not only that but if these two links don't mean the same, what of the others on that "fansite" my questions need answers!

    It is a matter of if I can accept this existence or not.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • closetpossum said:
    Is this SCP Canon? Cause I just spent a good 25 minutes and dug up two sources.
    One: is the canon SCP-1926 which does not mention this at all, I think, I skimmed it.
    and
    Two: THIS version of SCP-1926.

    My mind is confused not only because of the mention and/or image of this bunny doll. But The entire site as a whole. Is this some kind of fansite version of SCP Foundation and not only that but if these two links don't mean the same, what of the others on that "fansite" my questions need answers!

    It is a matter of if I can accept this existence or not.

    This iteration of 1926 no longer exists on the mainsite. The first link you provide effectively replaced it.

    It was removed wholesale from the SCP Foundation due to the aforementioned out-of-universe issues. Essentially, the author of the original 1926 plagiarised the creator of the doll's storyline, and as a consequence the article wound up being deleted after an initial rewrite was found to be not enough to address the copyvio. The author themselves was banned from the site prior to the first rewrite attempt.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • On a related note, since (formerly) 1926-1 posts seem to now be being posted without the tag, -"scp_foundation" and -"scp-1926-1" and +"mewt_(elly_zupko)" for consistency. (see also post #4412374 )

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0