dog one (film) created by unknown artist
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • They don't skip like the DVDs all do after 1 month, and they don't have these stupid forced ads each time we want to see the film. I miss VHS

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Oh my god seriously.

    No, you couldn't put "Not relevant to site" or "Not useful."
    "Not related to anything."

    No, you had to go and put "Not furry." Go headbutt a nail.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Neitsuke said:
    They don't skip like the DVDs all do after 1 month, and they don't have these stupid forced ads each time we want to see the film. I miss VHS

    No, they wear out and lose picture quality.

    You can fix a DVD by cleaning it, you can't do that with a VHS tape.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Actini said:
    Oh my god seriously.

    No, you couldn't put "Not relevant to site" or "Not useful."
    "Not related to anything."

    No, you had to go and put "Not furry." Go headbutt a nail.

    Well the site was originally constructed as a furry art (not necessarily pornographic but furry) site. Despite what some have been saying to the contrary.

    Also yeah I still use VHS. Just picked up another VCR for $2 not too long ago. And got the complete dubbed boxset of "Record of Lodoss War" from 1996.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Neitsuke said:
    They don't skip like the DVDs all do after 1 month, and they don't have these stupid forced ads each time we want to see the film. I miss VHS

    Or you could just take better care of your belongings. I have ten-year-old DVDs in perfect condition.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • slyroon said:
    dog 1
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0184673/

    Wow is this real? If so I had no idea Linda Lovelace (of "Deep Throat" fame) was in such a film. Wasn't that illegal even in the 70s?

    Also yeah still not furry, zoophilia is not furry. If this is real it would be pretty funny if there was a "family version" but I don't see how that could be since imdb says it's only 20 something minutes long.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Ratty said:
    Well the site was originally constructed as a furry art (not necessarily pornographic but furry) site. Despite what some have been saying to the contrary.

    Also yeah I still use VHS. Just picked up another VCR for $2 not too long ago. And got the complete dubbed boxset of "Record of Lodoss War" from 1996.

    One of the admins gave me a negative rep because i comented on a hentai picture of a human "isnt this a yiff website?". that person is a really bad admin.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Actini said:
    Oh my god seriously.

    No, you couldn't put "Not relevant to site" or "Not useful."
    "Not related to anything."

    its a joke you ass
    No, you had to go and put "Not furry." Go headbutt a nail.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Ratty said:
    Wow is this real? If so I had no idea Linda Lovelace (of "Deep Throat" fame) was in such a film. Wasn't that illegal even in the 70s?

    Also yeah still not furry, zoophilia is not furry. If this is real it would be pretty funny if there was a "family version" but I don't see how that could be since imdb says it's only 20 something minutes long.

    There is NO family version you noob!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • cracky said:
    There is NO family version you noob!

    Note the "if"s and the "I don't see how that could be" in my original post.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Narji said:
    They sure are classic, and I have a lot of them. XD

    No wonder you don't come out of the closet >.>

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Why is this still on here? So much stuff flagged irrelevant to the site that isn't and then stuff like this is left up.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0