created by unknown artist
Parent: post #1461301 (learn more) show »
  • Comments
    •
    Show all comments

    Ed935

    Member

    Here it is said that he drawn that on 1923, so, it was probally before the November 1923 Beerhall Putsch

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    DirtyRatMatt

    Member

    Not gonna lie, this is actually pretty well made.

    I'm amazed he didn't get accepted into art school if this is what he made.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
    •

    StakeFromJateFarm

    Member

    dirtyratmatt said:
    I'm amazed he didn't get accepted into art school if this is what he made.

    Iirc most of his art was good in an architectural sense, because he drew mostly buildings. He got rejected because he was more of an architect than an artist. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
    •

    MegaEdgelord

    Member

    dirtyratmatt said:
    Not gonna lie, this is actually pretty well made.

    I'm amazed he didn't get accepted into art school if this is what he made.

    It's a misconception that Hitler was rejected from art school because his portfolio wasn't good enough, it's actually the opposite, they rejected him because they wouldn't be able to teach him anything new there and recommended that he apply for an architecture degree instead.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
    •

    Epantsimator

    Member

    stakefromjatefarm said:
    Iirc most of his art was good in an architectural sense, because he drew mostly buildings. He got rejected because he was more of an architect than an artist. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

    megaedgelord said:
    It's a misconception that Hitler was rejected from art school because his portfolio wasn't good enough, it's actually the opposite, they rejected him because they wouldn't be able to teach him anything new there and recommended that he apply for an architecture degree instead.

    It's a bit of both: he was technically competent, but much like in a music exam, just because you can hit all the correct notes doesn't mean you've got the soul. Hell, there are plenty of artists here that'll blow your mind with their technique, but the composition itself is emotionally dead. The critic in the famous 2002 blind review noted Hitler's repertoire betrayed "a profound disinterest in people".

  • Reply
  • |
  • 21
    •

    Ed935

    Member

    Honestly, you can say anything about him, but you can't call him a bad artist. He would be far better as an artist than a politician - despite being such a skilled one. Saddly he was a product of his age and many other germans (not the majority but a small and considerable amount of them) belived in the racial delusions of a superior race.

    And no, i'm not defending Adolf, he was one of the worst persons that ever lived. I'm just saying that if he made another path things would be far better for us and for him. Maybe he could be remebered as a talented german-austrian painter and not as the monster we known him - as the Führer of the Deutsches Reich.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
    •

    Ed935

    Member

    privateboy169 said:

    froggo_doggo said:I wonder if Adolf takes commissions

    I mean he looks like a talented furry artist. I want a commission of (insert furry imagination here) SOOO BAAAD

    Well... he rly liked wolfes, so...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    user 400440

    Member

    epantsimator said:
    It's a bit of both: he was technically competent, but much like in a music exam, just because you can hit all the correct notes doesn't mean you've got the soul. Hell, there are plenty of artists here that'll blow your mind with their technique, but the composition itself is emotionally dead. The critic in the famous 2002 blind review noted Hitler's repertoire betrayed "a profound disinterest in people".

    Yes and no, they did recommend architecture to him, but that was because of his great interest and potential with realistically drawn buildings & not because he was overqualified. His paintings had glaring perspective and proportion errors, typical of the average art student but not good enough for their prestigious standards.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    popoto

    Member

    Of all the things I've seen on this site, from the infamous cheesegrater to whitekitten, the fact that literally hitler is here has probably surprised me the most.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    privateboy169

    Member

    stakefromjatefarm said:
    Iirc most of his art was good in an architectural sense, because he drew mostly buildings. He got rejected because he was more of an architect than an artist. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

    Architect or artist, both are better than a dictator. Really you can't spell dictator without dick.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    Sad Lad

    Member

    ilikedisney said:
    If Hitler grew up in this generation he’d be drawing the most bomb ass Beastars yiff rn.

    This is one’a those comments that’s gonna come to me in dark visions when I least expect it for years down the line

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    IchHeisseHansie

    Member

    epantsimator said:
    It's a bit of both: he was technically competent, but much like in a music exam, just because you can hit all the correct notes doesn't mean you've got the soul. Hell, there are plenty of artists here that'll blow your mind with their technique, but the composition itself is emotionally dead. The critic in the famous 2002 blind review noted Hitler's repertoire betrayed "a profound disinterest in people".

    accurate

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    LendriMujina

    Member

    "I'll randomly check the tag for exactly 100 years ago and see what's there. Oh, hey, what a cute doggy. But... 35 comments? That's a bit weird, I wonder what they could be talking ab--oh jeez that explains it"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •