"Male"
What?

Furrin_Gok said:
"Male"
What?

no clit, no urethra, yet still not a cloaca, it's a genital slit.

Sahlohkin said:
no clit, no urethra, yet still not a cloaca, it's a genital slit.

Well, sure, but that doesn't make it male.

Furrin_Gok said:
Well, sure, but that doesn't make it male.

https://e621.net/forum/show/169276

Buzzardlord said:
https://e621.net/forum/show/169276

Hey, thanks. I was looking for that thread. Give it a read yourself:

parasprite said:
Even considering this, many of the non-feral posts currently tagged with cloaca probably still fit better under cuntboy than male. I don't think they should get an automatic pass "just because they are avians" but I'm not against taking real animal anatomy into consideration as long as they are tagged within reason and play nicely with other tags. In other words, when correctly tagged searches like male clitoris -intersex -female should return very few posts (if any).

Now, this guy does lack the clitoris, which isn't a point largely covered there. That's something that should better fall under ambiguous_gender, as tag what you see is a rule we use here.

Furrin_Gok said:
Hey, thanks. I was looking for that thread. Give it a read yourself:
Now, this guy does lack the clitoris, which isn't a point largely covered there. That's something that should better fall under ambiguous_gender, as tag what you see is a rule we use here.

I know that “tag what you see” is a rule and I did just that. What I see is a Garchomp that clearly has a genital slit making it male. That is definitely not how a vagina looks like.

Buzzardlord said:
I know that “tag what you see” is a rule and I did just that. What I see is a Garchomp that clearly has a genital slit making it male. That is definitely not how a vagina looks like.

Genital slits are ambiguous, simply because it could be a female without a clitoris.

Furrin_Gok said:
Genital slits are ambiguous, simply because it could be a female without a clitoris.

But aren’t male reptiles the only ones with genital slits?

Plus, the physique of this Garchomp is more akin to a male. I know females can be that muscular too, but some artists usually put feminine features to differentiate it so people don’t mistake the character for being the opposite gender.

Buzzardlord said:
But aren’t male reptiles the only ones with genital slits?

Nope, they get cloaca. It's male marine mammals that end up with genital slits, but for the purposes of gender tagging that's not so relevant.

Plus, the physique of this Garchomp is more akin to a male. I know females can be that muscular too, but some artists usually put feminine features to differentiate it so people don’t mistake the character for being the opposite gender.

This, however, is, and is why I haven't touched the tags. My own mind tells me this is a cuntboy, but I know that my perception doesn't effect tagging. Waiting on staff to announce how the tagging works in this case, it may be right as is.

Furrin_Gok said:
Nope, they get cloaca.

At least, that's what the linked thread seemed to suggest >.>