You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
cybercraft
MemberOhhh gewd, how many times do i haves to tell you. We can not survive having flying, armored, and fire breathing sergals. Nice picture though.
Argovril
MemberAn anatomically correct female sergal, a dragon and a beach. You have my upvote.
Thorsten Anzomi
MemberI have to agree with this.
j-90
MemberShe seems to have lured something in...
Exurio
MemberDon't worry: biological incompatability's got us covered.
XeroWolf
MemberThere's no such thing as biological incompatibility when it come to the fandom
Exurio
Memberscience has gone too far
sergal239
MemberExcept there isnt really a "correct" sergal... some have breasts, some don't. its all allowed according to Miss mick.
rednikzelong
Member"Dragons are notoriously virile, able to crossbreed with virtually any creature."
According to DnD canon, there is no such thing as biological incompatibility with a dragon.
Exurio
MemberDragons are sex gods, then? Haha; Bethesda went the other way in TES lore: "dragon's don't reproduce; they all came about by magic".
Got to admit I am intrigued by the idea of a dragon/sergal hybrid.
Miss Mick would be the Sergals' creator, then? How come I haven't heard of her sooner, I wonder...
sergal239
MemberPerhaps because you've been living under a rock? Seriously google sergal and you'll see "created by trancy mick" Also bethesda didnt create dragons... Nether did DND.
Exurio
MemberYou don't have to be rude; sergals aren't especially well-known where I come from... didn't mean to offend you with my ignorance.
As for your latter statement: you say Bethedsa, or the makers of DnD didn't invent dragons, well of course they didn't; I think you missed the point that I was poking fun at them.
Login to respond »