meme clothing created by photonoko
Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 2 children (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • SturmDrachen said:
    If we could just remove those troublesome pants

    This image would lose SO much sexiness if it were just a bared rump instead of those oh so sexy stockings covering it, accentuating every little detail just so.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • DracosBlackwing said:
    This image would lose SO much sexiness if it were just a bared rump instead of those oh so sexy stockings covering it, accentuating every little detail just so.

    This is why people have a fetish for ripping clothes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • DracosBlackwing said:
    This image would lose SO much sexiness if it were just a bared rump instead of those oh so sexy stockings covering it, accentuating every little detail just so.

    True I love it but It doesn't show her anus

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Promiscuous_Opossum said:
    Pants off, then we'll talk.

    W...wait. You'd be in this situation and want to TALK?!

    Pfft! This is one of those 'no further words are necessary' situations, if you ask me.

    On another note... does anyone know what thosee stockings are called? Do they even have a name?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • DracosBlackwing said:
    W...wait. You'd be in this situation and want to TALK?!

    Pfft! This is one of those 'no further words are necessary' situations, if you ask me.

    On another note... does anyone know what thosee stockings are called? Do they even have a name?

    No idea.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    DragonHugger said:
    Normally camel_toe would just be questionable. With no penis below, what warrants this as explicit?

    Deep camel toes are explicit, like it says in the wiki. Plus the fingering on the top of that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Genjar said:
    Deep camel toes are explicit, like it says in the wiki. Plus the fingering on the top of that.

    I figured as much. I would've always considered camel_toe ta be something explicit, but suppose that just is me.
    Thanks for the quick response. :P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0