olli created by braeburned
Viewing sample resized to 60% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Description

Super horny request for Olli getting stretched by a big sneaky wolf commuter. It's crowded, the ride's bumpy, everyone's on their phones anyway...who's gonna notice?

(see stuff a week early on patreon!)
https://www.patreon.com/braeburned

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • DracosBlackwing said:
    Wow, creepy.

    Why is this not labeled as cub? Would appreciate things like this not sneaking through my blacklist.

    It's size difference, not cub, and clearly labeled as such.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 93
  • DracosBlackwing said:
    Wow, creepy.

    Why is this not labeled as cub? Would appreciate things like this not sneaking through my blacklist.

    And yet, your dumb ass felt the need to click on it, rather than simply ignore it.

    Also, if you hold your cursor over an image thumbnail, it shows you wish tags are associated with it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 19
  • Denri said:
    I mean he literally says 'kid' so not sure why this isn't listed as cub until the artist chimes in

    A lot of teens or any kind of young people get called kid you know

  • Reply
  • |
  • 19
  • KrissTheManedWolf said:
    A lot of teens or any kind of young people get called kid you know

    I call my Older brother kid when he's being a jackass, or fuckin stupid. It's pretty flimsy in its use, honestly.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • Denri said:
    I mean he literally says 'kid' so not sure why this isn't listed as cub until the artist chimes in

    He's the star in a currently running comic where he owns an apartment, pays rent and is going to college, my dudes

  • Reply
  • |
  • 51
  • Denri said:
    I mean he literally says 'kid' so not sure why this isn't listed as cub until the artist chimes in

    Nah, I'm 31 and consider anyone 25 and under as a kid, and refer to them as such depending on whats going on.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • Fauxgirl said:
    Gonna be real, looks like cub and it even says it (kid). I don't care if you call adults "kid", this is more than implying an age gap.

    Age gap does not imply the other character is underage. There is definitely an age gap, but plenty of older people will call someone younger than them kid. For all we know, that wolf is 50 something, and the alpaca is in his 20s.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • I believe the "Young" tag should be removed due to the character not fitting the description given in the wiki

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Braeburned said:
    He's the star in a currently running comic where he owns an apartment, pays rent and is going to college, my dudes

    While true, this isn't relevant for tagging.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • DracosBlackwing said:
    Wow, creepy.

    Why is this not labeled as cub? Would appreciate things like this not sneaking through my blacklist.

    Denri said:
    I mean he literally says 'kid' so not sure why this isn't listed as cub until the artist chimes in

    Fauxgirl said:
    Gonna be real, looks like cub and it even says it (kid). I don't care if you call adults "kid", this is more than implying an age gap.

    Y'all are some uppity, pretentious-ass, motherfuckin drama vampires

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • Fauxgirl said:
    Or, you know, we tried to blacklist this kind of stuff and people are making it difficult.

    Lol only because you interpret a fictional character as being underage cuz he's small in stature and gets referred to euphemistically as "kid" by the random stranger who's fucking him in public XD - a claim which has already been refuted by the artist btw

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Fauxgirl said:
    Doesn't matter what the artist says about the artwork.

    It sounds like you should probably blacklist size_difference! Unless there's something particular about this piece that's causing an issue compared to other size_difference pieces, outside of interpreting the top's dirty talk as a statement of fact (i thought his proportions read as adult pretty clearly? especially alongside other work involving Olli, but perhaps his eyes are a bit big). Then again, it doesn't matter what I say.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Fauxgirl said:
    Doesn't matter what the artist says about the artwork.

    Maybe in terms of tagging and with regards to a multitude of clearly definable and identifiable character traits, you'd be correct - i.e. someone posts a pic of a character with no visible chest, no visible genitalia, etc. and it gets tagged ambiguous_gender but the artist says it's a male. Totally, doesn't matter what they say. Those are clearly defined tags.

    However, when it comes to what constitutes cub things get a little bit more difficult to delineate, homie. Especially in the contexts of works of fiction within the bounds of a fantasy/si-fi setting - which is essentially any and all furry art/media, because as we all know anthropomorphic animals do not exist in reality - thus one can find it much harder to clearly say which fictional animal person is what age. Starting to make sense, buddy?

    Now don't get me wrong, if it's like a fucking pre-ambulatory infant in a diaper or whatever, I can get it if you wanna call a spade a spade. But unlike in that scenario, you're drawing your conclusion on the basis of character height and extremely ambiguous dialogue. And in case you weren't aware, there are multitudinous adults in the real world who resemble children/are small of stature/get called kid as either a way of insulting or demeaning them, emphasizing age difference, or as a term of endearment.

    TL;DR - calm ur ass down and enjoy the porn bruh

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Fauxgirl said:
    I enjoy the size_difference tag. Sounds like you're intentionally misunderstanding me.

    well, help me understand then! what sets this piece apart from others that feature size difference or age difference between adults, besides the dirty talk? Cause knowing will help me know what to change in order to avoid people mistaking my work for something it's not in the future.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • I'm under the impression we shouldn't be debating with someone who's bio says they're here to roleplay, but I digress.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • icy_layer said:
    your avatar is literally of a cub

    Yes it is. But it's a completely G rated, cute cub, no sex involved. I don't have an issue with young fur art in general, just the porn side of things.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • acervinelover said:
    Age gap does not imply the other character is underage. There is definitely an age gap, but plenty of older people will call someone younger than them kid. For all we know, that wolf is 50 something, and the alpaca is in his 20s.

    I remember one time when I was in my twenties I ended up going home with this older dude that was just in really good shape and really attractive. We were doing it and then suddenly he called me Sonny and I've never lost a boner so fast in my life. LOL

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1