News: Jan 07, 2025 Show

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

Dec 1st: If your account has been hit in the most recent ban wave of compromised accounts please reach out to us at management[at]e621.net and we'll help you get your account back.
If you've already contacted us give us a moment to get to you, though if it takes longer than a day for us to get back to you do feel free to reach out again!
Dec 2nd: If you got got and suddenly aren't able to see any of our exquisite selection of sausage and taco posts double check that Safe Mode is disabled in your account settings (Account -> Settings -> Safe mode [right above the blacklist text box]).

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

chase created by meesh
Viewing sample resized to 85% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1897951 (learn more) show »
Blacklisted (3)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • Basteal said:
    So wait, why does one guys have a not being pissed on girl picture in front of this clearly not girl who is clearly being pissed on?

    As dumb as I find any kind of excretion fetish, this just makes it baffling.

    The original was cum, not piss.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 24
  • Basteal said:
    So wait, why does one guys have a not being pissed on girl picture in front of this clearly not girl who is clearly being pissed on?

    As dumb as I find any kind of excretion fetish, this just makes it baffling. He is imagining doing this to a girl

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Basteal said:
    So wait, why does one guys have a not being pissed on girl picture in front of this clearly not girl who is clearly being pissed on?

    As dumb as I find any kind of excretion fetish, this just makes it baffling.

    I can only piss if I see a hot chick

  • Reply
  • |
  • 62
  • removed the breasts tag because they're tiny and in pornography and it would get censored by a lot of gay dudes' blacklists. feel free to put it back if you disagree

    Basteal said:
    So wait, why does one guys have a not being pissed on girl picture in front of this clearly not girl who is clearly being pissed on?

    As dumb as I find any kind of excretion fetish, this just makes it baffling.

    The larger the group, the higher the chance there's a straight guy. It's actually a fantasy for a lot of gay guys, getting used by straight guys who need straight porn to get off or stay distracted enough or whatever

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • DieCupidDie said:
    removed the breasts tag because they're tiny and in pornography and it would get censored by a lot of gay dudes' blacklists. feel free to put it back if you disagree

    The larger the group, the higher the chance there's a straight guy. It's actually a fantasy for a lot of gay guys, getting used by straight guys who need straight porn to get off or stay distracted enough or whatever

    Upvoted b/c you right homie, at least in the sense of real-life sexual psychology. But in the context of E6 and its tagging protocol you're wrong, just because they don't fuck around with the "tag what you see" rules. Best I could tell you is to search the tag wiki or whatever to see if there are any tags relating to "straight-to-gay" or some other such related descriptive terminology regarding straight guys who do gay shit.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • theunfortunatelad said:
    they don't fuck around with the "tag what you see" rules.

    They do though... how many pics are tagged incest that don't explicitly identify the characters as family? Taking knowledge from previous images in a series or comic or other works by that artist would be "tag what you know"... that's not even to mention the examples of like charrs where the females also have flat chests and just a different fur pattern, so a clearly male-looking character with a dick got tagged dickgirl because video game nerds...

    Lol. But I appreciate you my dude.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • DieCupidDie said:
    They do though... how many pics are tagged incest that don't explicitly identify the characters as family? Taking knowledge from previous images in a series or comic or other works by that artist would be "tag what you know"... that's not even to mention the examples of like charrs where the females also have flat chests and just a different fur pattern, so a clearly male-looking character with a dick got tagged dickgirl because video game nerds...

    Lol. But I appreciate you my dude.

    Oh I didn't say anything about this site not being rife with hypocrisy and self-contradictory bullshit. Just that when they (they being the site administration and many of the users) choose to pick a fight about something, they ain't letting up until things are how they want them to be. It's shitty but what can ya do. And also why do we care so much to begin with? I mean as much as everyone refuses to admit it, the primary purpose of this "image board" is for furry porn. Lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I do wish there were either versions without the phone, or the breasts tag could be omitted, because DieCupidDie is correct, I didn’t even know there were prequels to the pictures that come after because I had breasts blacklisted.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.