this is new, Big mac + Rule 63 + humanization = THIS

>humanizing big mac
>2011
I seriously hope you guys don't do this

Incest AND bestiality? Don't see that very often.

....

Freefox said:
this is new, Big mac + humanization = THIS

fixed it, rule 63 doesn't apply here

Okay, did the girls travel to a parrallel universe or something. Cause, I'd love to read up on that.
Still, how did Applejack end up in this situation? What, she fell for her brother in that world?

*Concestiality *Zoocestual

Anomynous said:
*Concestiality *Zoocestual

Hehe

How can this be incest? By all means, a human man can´t have a horse-daughter. Even if she would be adopted, it´s not really incest.

Eragonfan73 said:
fixed it, rule 63 doesn't apply here

my bad was rule 64

Shinryu said:
How can this be incest? By all means, a human man can´t have a horse-daughter. Even if she would be adopted, it´s not really incest.

He's a humanized Big Mac....he's her brother...lmao.

Pinprick said:
He's a humanized Big Mac....he's her brother...lmao.

I´m not familiar with mlp, but if I´m not mistaken, it´s called "tag what you see". It might be obvious to any insider, that he is her brother. But to anyone who doesn´t know the series, they appear in this picture in no way like relatives of any kind.

For me, it´s the same question like the other one in the news about herms. Is it incest if no family relation can be assumed based on the pic? I mean, they´re not even the same species.

Shinryu said:
I´m not familiar with mlp, but if I´m not mistaken, it´s called "tag what you see". It might be obvious to any insider, that he is her brother. But to anyone who doesn´t know the series, they appear in this picture in no way like relatives of any kind.

For me, it´s the same question like the other one in the news about herms. Is it incest if no family relation can be assumed based on the pic? I mean, they´re not even the same species.

You have a point. But maybe it still is incest? I dunno. Now my brain hurts

OH APPLEJACK, IF ONLY I COULD TASTE THE MAGIC!~

Shinryu said:
I´m not familiar with mlp, but if I´m not mistaken, it´s called "tag what you see". It might be obvious to any insider, that he is her brother. But to anyone who doesn´t know the series, they appear in this picture in no way like relatives of any kind.

For me, it´s the same question like the other one in the news about herms. Is it incest if no family relation can be assumed based on the pic? I mean, they´re not even the same species.

Ever heard of transformation?

ippiki_ookami said:
Incest AND bestiality? Don't see that very often.

Hmm...incestiality?

Jolem said:
Ever heard of transformation?

Transformation would be an explanation, but not a solution. In fact, it would render most of the rules and the whole blacklist useless, if it was that simple. Because anyone can say "You know, that might look like a chimera dickgirl, but it was a frog before. Thus it shall have the frog tag, too."

Who cares whether this is incest?! The real question is, is this hot? And the answer is, yes, yes it is.

It looks like fan art for the story "Pushing Buttons"
( http://explicit.ponyfictionarchive.net/viewstory.php?sid=257&warning=9 )

now i'm waiting for an explanation how's that incest though it's interspecies...

stop arguing.it's incest because it's bic mac, her brother, only humanized.

A night I have this dream .-.

PurpleLemon said:
stop arguing.it's incest because it's bic mac, her brother, only humanized.

I don't see anything to identify who he is.