nosivi (mythology) created by rajii
Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

KousetsuFox's Commission

Done for kousetsufox

Enjoy

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Wouldn't it be tagged as just "intersex" if there's no explicitly visible characteristics of either trait? Or am I mistaken?
    Picture: Very well-made, by the way.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • AnotherDay said:
    As per guidelines set out currently I am retagging this as herm as we do not have any visible proof that there are not female genitalia around there somewhere. Remember. Only tag dickgirl if it is PROVEN in the PICTURE ITSELF to NOT have a vagina, whether or not the character may or may not have one in artistic vision or w/e. Honestly, though.. In this picture, if it wasn't for the obvious action I may even tag this female and female on male.

    By that logic, it shouldn't be tagged herm, either. There's no visible proof that there is female genitalia around there somewhere. The penis is heavily implied, as they're fucking a guy. So the correct tag would be 'intersex'.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • DeeJayDragon said:
    By that logic, it shouldn't be tagged herm, either. There's no visible proof that there is female genitalia around there somewhere. The penis is heavily implied, as they're fucking a guy. So the correct tag would be 'intersex'.

    Just tag the fucking thing with female and male, since the dragon topping him could be using a double ended dildo, which wouldn't show up, and not a strap-on which would. By any logic this picture CAN NOT be tagged with anything relating to intersex genders.

    Now then, shut up and enjoy your fapping material.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • Khakiwolf said:
    Would love to unload in that cute twink fox. <3

    What are you talking about? You're into big gigantic low hanging dicks unloading into you :D

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • DeeJayDragon said:
    By that logic, it shouldn't be tagged herm, either. There's no visible proof that there is female genitalia around there somewhere. The penis is heavily implied, as they're fucking a guy. So the correct tag would be 'intersex'.

    intersex? buh how about strapon? ;D
    Dickgirl = visible dick and breasts
    Herm = visible vagina and dick
    Intersex: herm = dickgirl = cuntboy and others
    Strapon =/= intersex.
    If we can't to see genitalia but we see breasts then she is in default a female.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • i really don't get why this picture is so controversial.

    look at all the other stuff on this site.
    then come back to this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Loc0 said:
    intersex? buh how about strapon? ;D
    Dickgirl = visible dick and breasts
    Herm = visible vagina and dick
    Intersex: herm = dickgirl = cuntboy and others
    Strapon =/= intersex.
    If we can't to see genitalia but we see breasts then she is in default a female.

    A strap-on would require... you know... straps. Of which there are none.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • I always like to imagine someone searching for specific tags to fap to.
    OMG FAPFAPFAPFAP abstract_background!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Loc0 said:
    intersex? buh how about strapon? ;D
    Dickgirl = visible dick and breasts
    Herm = visible vagina and dick
    Intersex: herm = dickgirl = cuntboy and others
    Strapon =/= intersex.
    If we can't to see genitalia but we see breasts then she is in default a female.

    Read the tag definitions. This is made obvious the dragon has at least a penis. Though since nothing can be seen to confirm either the presence or lack of female or further male genitalia: intersex.
    Also "dickgirl" tag removed, that's just wrong. At least a Female tag is plausible but not dickgirl.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • VinSzu said:
    Female tag is plausible but not dickgirl.

    That makes no sense. Female gentilia is not visible, and the one on top is clearly mounting the male on the bottom without any evidence of a strapon. That is why the female tag has been removed, and the dickgirl tag has been added.

    This image has been up for 2 years, there really shouldn't be anymore tag warring on it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1