fleki, kaji, nimrais, and wolfy-nail created by wolfy-nail
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Because you know, joint infidelity in an attractive quality in men, where pleasure takes priority over individual loyalty and responsibility.

    These people are scum. :/

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • Mostel said:
    Because you know, joint infidelity in an attractive quality in men, where pleasure takes priority over individual loyalty and responsibility.

    These people are scum. :/

    What? Seriously? I can't- Are you trolling? Or just really that uptight? I can't tell.

    Seriously, the only problem such a swing could have, in my book, is the potential for jealousy and the ensuing drama. Clearly none of these four have that issue. Fuck, it's a quartet of consenting adults. Where's the harm?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Mostel said:
    Because you know, joint infidelity in an attractive quality in men, where pleasure takes priority over individual loyalty and responsibility.

    These people are scum. :/

    It's a fucking drawing.
    Maybe you should get off the computer if you're having trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Awesome, one pic completely validated all of my suspicions about four people and their idiocy. Thanks e621!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Mostel said:
    Because you know, joint infidelity in an attractive quality in men, where pleasure takes priority over individual loyalty and responsibility.

    These people are scum. :/

    Yes, these 'people'. Also... even if we're taking off the porn lens (rarely a good idea on sites like this) I'm
    seeing as much 'infidelity' in the women as the men.

    It would be disloyalty if, say, they were doing it behind each others backs. But, that's not the case here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Mostel said:
    Because you know, joint infidelity in an attractive quality in men, where pleasure takes priority over individual loyalty and responsibility.

    These people are scum. :/

    I highly doubt he'd be engaging in activity his mate disapproves of so publicly, or else she'd stop being his mate. The problem with identifying 'infidelity' is that it only applies when 'fidelity' was an expectation to begin with. If fidelity isn't a requirement of the consenting adults *in* mateship, it can't be defied--just like you can't spring a leak in an empty cup >_> you can make all the holes you want, but it will never leak until you try to put something in it.

    But look... I can see where you're coming from, because I've been there--so I think you may benefit from knowing this: Fidelity is only an admirable quality when it is requested. The ability to engage in fidelity does not equal the inability to decide not to. People like a sense of adventure and variety, the concept of 'risk' adds 'excitement'. The idea that you are unconcerned with matters of monogamy (perceivably) until you meet your ideal mate will make it all that more romantic for the both of you when suddenly they "helped" you "rediscover" your capacity for it.

    TL;DR, Sit down with me and have a cup of chill. It's good for you.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat pat

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1