mikhaila kirov created by tsampikos
Viewing sample resized to 29% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1631535 (learn more) show »
Description
  • Comments
  • Doveen said:
    Ooooh, Mikhaila tagged as female and no shitshow happened? Never thought I'd live to see the day!!

    Of the past 38 Mikhaila images, only 2 are being called cuntboys. The 39th before all that? Literally this exact same image, erroneously labeled as a cuntboy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • And of course it gets locked as cuntboy, does no one actually read the tagging guidelines?

    The gender tagging guidelines pretty explicitly say "Vagina - Breasts + Female body = Female", This is pretty clearly a female body (wide hips, narrow shoulders, thick thighs and proportionally long legs) so what retard keeps insisting that this should be tagged cuntboy?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • Astraeos said:
    And of course it gets locked as cuntboy, does no one actually read the tagging guidelines?

    The gender tagging guidelines pretty explicitly say "Vagina - Breasts + Female body = Female", This is pretty clearly a female body (wide hips, narrow shoulders, thick thighs and proportionally long legs) so what retard keeps insisting that this should be tagged cuntboy?

    NotMeNotYou, apparently.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ClaiohmSolais said:
    Of the past 38 Mikhaila images, only 2 are being called cuntboys. The 39th before all that? Literally this exact same image, erroneously labeled as a cuntboy.

    Astraeos said:
    And of course it gets locked as cuntboy, does no one actually read the tagging guidelines?

    The gender tagging guidelines pretty explicitly say "Vagina - Breasts + Female body = Female", This is pretty clearly a female body (wide hips, narrow shoulders, thick thighs and proportionally long legs) so what retard keeps insisting that this should be tagged cuntboy?

    totallycoolaid said:
    NotMeNotYou, apparently.

    @NotMeNotYou So for the sake of fairness can this jus be tagged as ambiguous_gender?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Kodanis said:
    @NotMeNotYou So for the sake of fairness can this jus be tagged as ambiguous_gender?

    Sure, let me just check if fairness is part of our tagging guidelines.

    Oh.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Masculine (anthro, humanoid): Broad shoulders, thicker/flatter eyebrows, squared jaw, prominent "adams apple", body fat distributed mostly to lower torso ("beer gut"/"apple shape"), facial hair (mustache, beard), thicker arm and body hair.

    Feminine (anthro, humanoid): Usually smaller in proportion to masculine characters, wide hips and pelvis, more arched eyebrows, smaller hands/feet, breasts, body fat distributed to lower/mid torso and thighs ("pear shape").

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Doveen said:
    Ooooh, Mikhaila tagged as female and no shitshow happened? Never thought I'd live to see the day!!

    Think again she's been tagged as intersex because people just can't seem to comprehend a female with a flat chest!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • KaylaFoxy said:
    Think again she's been tagged as intersex because people just can't seem to comprehend a female with a flat chest!

    And out of all images of Mik, this is probably the one where she's shown with the widest and most feminine hips. Yet it's still considered intersex because I guess some people just have a fixation on marking this character as a cuntboy andromorph.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Hurr_Durr said:
    And out of all images of Mik, this is probably the one where she's shown with the widest and most feminine hips. Yet it's still considered intersex because I guess some people just have a fixation on marking this character as a cuntboy andromorph.

    Yep, this site clearly needs a tagging bot: just upload something you want and an algorithm will automatically tag it for you, no manual and admin supervision needed. And if it still gets wrongly tagged, you could just edit the tags.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • GRFurryStuff said:
    Yep, this site clearly needs a tagging bot: just upload something you want and an algorithm will automatically tag it for you, no manual and admin supervision needed. And if it still gets wrongly tagged, you could just edit the tags.

    if this site gets a tagging bot, then it will become like youtube. what we need are some actually competent admins who aren't confused about body proportions.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • sulcata_lord said:
    if this site gets a tagging bot, then it will become like youtube. what we need are some actually competent admins who aren't confused about body proportions.

    careful there, gotten flagged in the past for calling them on the same exact thing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0