cyprena and nachtschwinge (european mythology and etc) created by artonis
Viewing sample resized to 90% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Mdf said:
    No it isn't, it's missing meat and mayo.

    Dang it, now I'm hungry.

    Argentum48 said:
    You mean a dick/cum edit?

    It has all the ingredients for the viewer to immerse themselves as the final one

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Argentum48 said:
    Don’t know what the downvotes are for. Dick=meat and cum=mayo, as the commentor before me asked for.

    Some people just go to different posts disliking just about every comment

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Argentum48 said:
    Don’t know what the downvotes are for. Dick=meat and cum=mayo, as the commentor before me asked for.

    As it happens, more women than men tend to search out lesbian pornography. Some people are surprised by this, thinking that the typical consumer is male (though, to be fair, a lot of such pornography is clearly made with males in mind, even if it ends up being mostly viewed by females).

    So when someone comes in and tries to make it all about guys - or worse, say something that comes off as "this isn't real without a guy" - people get understandably annoyed. The "it's not real sex unless there's a penis involved" is a very common attitude that people get fed up with.

    It's pretty closely related to how people get annoyed when someone comes on a picture and says "this would be better if the character were a different sex". Acting as though you are entitled to an image catering to your orientation is going to get you some downvotes.

    In this case, you didn't ask for that directly, but I still suspect there's some spillover from the negative feelings from MDF's comment.

    Second, the joke was kind of obvious so it didn't really need explaining.

    Lastly, the first comment was a self-insertion fantasy, while your comment is the one that brought up the idea of an edit.

    So yeah. That's my best guess as to why you got some downvotes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • Quite a long comment

    Clawdragons said:
    As it happens, more women than men tend to search out lesbian pornography. Some people are surprised by this, thinking that the typical consumer is male (though, to be fair, a lot of such pornography is clearly made with males in mind, even if it ends up being mostly viewed by females).

    So when someone comes in and tries to make it all about guys - or worse, say something that comes off as "this isn't real without a guy" - people get understandably annoyed. The "it's not real sex unless there's a penis involved" is a very common attitude that people get fed up with.

    It's pretty closely related to how people get annoyed when someone comes on a picture and says "this would be better if the character were a different sex". Acting as though you are entitled to an image catering to your orientation is going to get you some downvotes.

    In this case, you didn't ask for that directly, but I still suspect there's some spillover from the negative feelings from MDF's comment.

    Second, the joke was kind of obvious so it didn't really need explaining.

    Lastly, the first comment was a self-insertion fantasy, while your comment is the one that brought up the idea of an edit.

    So yeah. That's my best guess as to why you got some downvotes.

    We need more people like you to explain in such intricacy about the rights and wrongs of comments.
    You explained all of it pretty well.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3