Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 2 children (learn more) show ยป
Description

Collab animation for James/Polaris on fA! This collab was done with Meesh on visual development and Cosmicminerals on backgrounds!

Polaris and James might be interested in having an audio version made, so send em a note on fA if you'd like to make an inquiry!

uncompressed vid can be found here; https://we.tl/t-2hGelNas2T (link will only be active for the next week.)

  • Comments
  • This collab is one of the best I've seen. I knew the animation style was familiar, and the art style screened meesh. I thought it was a new artist till I saw the credits then realized it's several great ones coming together. Very good stuff. Happy to see it too.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • taylorkingct said:
    Nice but where are the tags...

    This is one of the main reasons why I see artists who want their stuff here not posting it themselves here: tagging is too huge process to learn when artists only want to post their stuff.

    At least it was 4 tags (exactly) and included artist and genders, so it could've been worse, but that's still kinda abysmal tagging.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • 18 years I've been in the furry fandom.....and we finally hit this point with great animation! Impressive, and wow excellent work! Looking forward to stuff like this in the future!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • xXLeviatan said:
    Fuzzamorous' animation with Meesh's style?

    I don't think it can get much better than that.

    This is furry porn history in the making.

    I've waited 16 years for this.

    GO SUPPORT FUZZAMOROUS ON PATREON NOW

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • It's not just the amazing quality, or the fluidity of the animation I love, it's the characterization too. Just look at those two...the -expressions- in their faces. It's so -good-!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Damn, it got past my blacklist just because there's a pair of tits in the poster on the wall, and with a score of 508 in less than a day, why the hell wouldn't I check it out?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • Draqen said:
    So how much did the commissioners pay to have this gloriousness created?

    The commissioner paid 8600 dollars for this animation, a bit too much but the animation is excellent. I guess it was worth the price?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • this is absolutely one of the best animations ever put on this site. i might just have to start pledging on patreon

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • That's really hot but also really cute. That's so well done that you can feel the love they have to each other <3 The emotions are perfect and they feel real. I absolutely love this kind of sex comissions. Those are my favorites <3 If only Patreon haven't been a dick to me in the past, I would probably have already pledged

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Megazard_exe said:
    The commissioner paid 8600 dollars for this animation, a bit too much but the animation is excellent. I guess it was worth the price?

    based on some frame counts and how much on average you might spend drawing each frame and working on animation in general, this might have taken about 300 hours to make. its 28 and half dollars per hour. and this is ignoring the fact that the money was probably split across three people since its a collab.

    is that really "a bit too much"?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • siikaprinssi said:
    based on some frame counts and how much on average you might spend drawing each frame and working on animation in general, this might have taken about 300 hours to make. its 28 and half dollars per hour. and this is ignoring the fact that the money was probably split across three people since its a collab.
    is that really "a bit too much"?

    Was it an auction that drove the price so high? or was it set at that amount to begin with?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Draqen said:
    Was it an auction that drove the price so high? or was it set at that amount to begin with?

    how im supposed to know? ask from the artists or the commissioners. regardless i believe that that price is fair considering the work amount two minutes of good quality drawn animation takes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • siikaprinssi said:
    how im supposed to know? ask from the artists or the commissioners. regardless i believe that that price is fair considering the work amount two minutes of good quality drawn animation takes.

    Just curious. But yeah, agreed. I imagine a LOT of hours went into this :3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • And naturally fuzzamorous is the backbone of yet another amazing animation. I sure hope they don't leave anytime soon.

    Like zonkpunch sadly did.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Yup, that's quite well made alright! I kinda expected his balls to lift more during orgasm, but that's a small detail and it probably varies between males.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • A small clip of this has made it to facebook
    And the moment whoever the top is spreads the bottoms cheeks, Rolf from Ed, Edd, and Eddy is there.

    Which is ironically how I learned this existed (And am ashamed of myself that I didn't know it did)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • That is definitely on the list of some of the most gorgeous animation I've ever seen, which I never expected to say about furry porn.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Zanazoth said:
    A small clip of this has made it to facebook
    And the moment whoever the top is spreads the bottoms cheeks, Rolf from Ed, Edd, and Eddy is there.

    Which is ironically how I learned this existed (And am ashamed of myself that I didn't know it did)

    Hey can I get uhhhh source. Trying to find it for ages now LOL.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I completely understand why this is tagged with pussy, female, etc because of the posters. It still feels pretty misleading.

    Should tags be absolute, or should they be engineered to better serve the search function they're here for? Lots of people with female stuff blacklisted could miss this, and people searching for straight stuff won't exactly be looking for this.

    idk, not trying to start an argument, it's just interesting.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4