DoubleP1997 said:
That Fox is a real horny jerk... I love it! Get that piece of meat!

jerk? more of a sociopath. that amount had to kill her.

iiForeverSkyy said:
jerk? more of a sociopath. that amount had to kill her.

Assassinations for dick.

It's amazing how many people flip flop on morals on comics. Simple if you don't enjoy it why do you guys keep coming back to critique the same thing that happened pages ago. I can understand the page of you see something you don't like then you you voice your opinion of disliking the moral of the character then move on. Not ruin others that are looking forward to and enjoying the comic.

Vityozvolk said:
It's amazing how many people flip flop on morals on comics. Simple if you don't enjoy it why do you guys keep coming back to critique the same thing that happened pages ago. I can understand the page of you see something you don't like then you you voice your opinion of disliking the moral of the character then move on. Not ruin others that are looking forward to and enjoying the comic.

It's dislike of the character,not the art itself. Like not liking Malfoy in "Harry Potter" but being a fan of the books/films

His behaviour on this page also is a direct consequence from his actions on earlier pages - speaking of drugging the girl is still in a present context

imagine arguing about the morality of a character on a site dedicated to sharing pictures of animal people fucking eachother, or other animals, or other things, with or without consent, or sometimes eating them and digesting them, or their feces and urine, while dressed up in a diaper, or hell even killing them or amputating their limbs or their genitals or something

Just wait. He won't get what he thinks he's getting.

I worked in porn for a few years and part of the job is building up basically infinite stamina. After a while in the industry and learning certain techniques, methods and skills most men can basically fuck for hours. I was never on the edge of cumming. I came when I wanted or when I was told to do so. In other words, a seasoned porn actor can't be edged. At least as far as men go.

Jabberwocky said:
Just wait. He won't get what he thinks he's getting.

A lawsuit?

D4rk said:
It's dislike of the character,not the art itself. Like not liking Malfoy in "Harry Potter" but being a fan of the books/films

His behaviour on this page also is a direct consequence from his actions on earlier pages - speaking of drugging the girl is still in a present context

I mean when there is cub art people say that's pedophilic and then they get shunned and told to use the blacklist. When someone gets drugged. No no no that's wrong and we must all say it's wrong and not like the character even though when other worse characters are defended with a stupid blacklist reason

It's amazing how many people flip flop on their morals like I said. I don't care what you think guys just be absolute in decisions.

If we say on cub porn people that critique the act are shunned then if someone is drugged (indirectly) for sex then why is this ok to flip flop.

Cant have your cake and eat it. If we can shun this character why can't we berate the gore characters or the anything in general. Pick one.

deagaw said:
imagine arguing about the morality of a character on a site dedicated to sharing pictures of animal people fucking eachother, or other animals, or other things, with or without consent, or sometimes eating them and digesting them, or their feces and urine, while dressed up in a diaper, or hell even killing them or amputating their limbs or their genitals or something

This comic is the exception apparently

This is what I'm saying people get critiqued when they say they don't like a gore character or anything and then others say don't look at it. But someone says something about this comic well don't look at it and oh no it's a problem.

Vityozvolk said:
I mean when there is cub art people say that's pedophilic and then they get shunned and told to use the blacklist. When someone gets drugged. No no no that's wrong and we must all say it's wrong and not like the character even though when other worse characters are defended with a stupid blacklist reason

It's amazing how many people flip flop on their morals like I said. I don't care what you think guys just be absolute in decisions.

If we say on cub porn people that critique the act are shunned then if someone is drugged (indirectly) for sex then why is this ok to flip flop.

Cant have your cake and eat it. If we can shun this character why can't we berate the gore characters or the anything in general. Pick one.

Recent events come to mind, as do the multiple comments on previous posts saying he "Cosbyed a bitch"

Vityozvolk said:
I mean when there is cub art people say that's pedophilic and then they get shunned and told to use the blacklist. When someone gets drugged. No no no that's wrong and we must all say it's wrong and not like the character even though when other worse characters are defended with a stupid blacklist reason

It's amazing how many people flip flop on their morals like I said. I don't care what you think guys just be absolute in decisions.

If we say on cub porn people that critique the act are shunned then if someone is drugged (indirectly) for sex then why is this ok to flip flop.

Cant have your cake and eat it. If we can shun this character why can't we berate the gore characters or the anything in general. Pick one.

i cant explain it well, but cub is a fetish. somnophilia is too, but hes not fucking the drugee. we don't like it, because this guy is ruining the company just because he wants some dick.

Emilio5033 said:
No somnophilia porn? Instant downvote

maybe you were a little too hasty to judge. next page reveals that he drugged the girl just because he wanted to fuck the horse himself.

Vityozvolk said:
I mean when there is cub art people say that's pedophilic and then they get shunned and told to use the blacklist. When someone gets drugged. No no no that's wrong and we must all say it's wrong and not like the character even though when other worse characters are defended with a stupid blacklist reason

It's amazing how many people flip flop on their morals like I said. I don't care what you think guys just be absolute in decisions.

If we say on cub porn people that critique the act are shunned then if someone is drugged (indirectly) for sex then why is this ok to flip flop.

Cant have your cake and eat it. If we can shun this character why can't we berate the gore characters or the anything in general. Pick one.

Vityozvolk said:
This comic is the exception apparently

This is what I'm saying people get critiqued when they say they don't like a gore character or anything and then others say don't look at it. But someone says something about this comic well don't look at it and oh no it's a problem.

1. You're doing that thing where a person points out hypocrisy by falsely equating everyone that isn't themself to one another. While there is likely an overlap, you can't reasonably claim that everyone that tells complainers to use their blacklists are the same exact people complaining here.

2. While it's hypocritical to tell others to blacklist things that they don't like and complain about things you don't like, moral codes and willing suspension of disbelief vary. A person who's fine with a fantasy involving an underage character consenting to sex isn't hypocritical for not being okay with a fantasy that involves drugging someone. Don't presume to know why people find certain things sexy or repulsive.

3. These pages are part of a larger series that do not focus on this topic. People who started reading the comic expecting one thing will not necessarily be okay with seeing another, radically different thing.

4. There's a difference between hating one aspect of a work and hating the the whole work. In this case, complainers may be sticking around because while they may hate the fennec as a character, they're probably willing to disregard what he did when the comic gets to the thing that drew them in to begin with: him getting fucked by the stallion.

While I don't typically whine about seeing things I hate, there's a lot of stuff I have to force myself to ignore to enjoy a work and I've become desensitized to some of it.

That all said, I'm not defending the complaining. I'm just pointing out why your argument doesn't make sense and why people complaining in this particular instance is easier to understand for me.

Who the fuck cares if he drugged her? This guy is practically tortured every time he works, he deserves some action.

lowhangingfruit said:
Who the fuck cares if he drugged her? This guy is practically tortured every time he works, he deserves some action.

Thank you

iiforeverskyy said:
jerk? more of a sociopath. that amount had to kill her.

That amount of what? Headache meds? You don't have a lot of experience with medicine, do you? You don't know what was in that bottle, all you have to go on is a symptom and an effect.
You want something to be pissed about? How about this? There's no such thing as a fluffer. So if we're going to take this fictional furry comic as seriously as you are, then the person who owns this little studio spent money to bring that dude on to fill a fictional position so that he can be thrown around and degraded for no particular reason. THAT is a sociopathic move. That is actually going out of your way to drag someone through the mud. Where's all your righteous indignation about that?

iiforeverskyy said:
jerk? more of a sociopath. that amount had to kill her.

Three pills for relieving headaches won't kill a person without major extenuating circumstances.

sylamorase said:
That amount of what? Headache meds? You don't have a lot of experience with medicine, do you? You don't know what was in that bottle, all you have to go on is a symptom and an effect.

Looks like a prescription bottle, so the combination of 'for headaches' and 'makes him sleepy' leads me to suspect it's Butalbital. The pill a few pages back also looked either white or a pale blue, and Butalbital is often pale blue.

I have frequent migraines, and I do have a prescription of it (well, a med with it mixed with acetaminophen), but I think I only took it once. I say "I think" because I only remember deciding I might go ahead and try it, and then my memory fogged up and I don't remember if I actually took it or not.

Minor memory loss is one of the side effects, so I decided to play it safe and basically not take it again. That was a few years ago, and now I just have the old, expired meds in the back of my drawer (I had to fish it out to get the spelling right, though).

... Rambling aside, it's worth pointing out that the tiger looks larger than the fennec, so a single dose for him might not be effective at all for her. A 3x dose increase is a bit extreme, but not as much as one might assume at a glance. But, side effects of drugs like this are hard to predict, and it is at the very least extremely irresponsible for him to drug her like this. While unlikely to kill her, the consequences have a reasonable (albeit still relatively small) chance of being severe.