i've seen this before. that one wasn't colored though

Daaaaaamn, who's the artist?

:D

I want to know the name of the artist, he/she has serious potential. I mean, look at the amount of detail spent on the Latias' facial expressions when the Latia gets a mouthfull :>

...Anyone notice that the first shot doesn't come back...?

If I could do tht it would be awesome and I would love it

bdanam said:
If I could do tht it would be awesome and I would love it

same here

Toumak1217 said:
rub...rub..rubrubrubrub SPLURT* liiiick suck...suck..sucksucksucksuuuck Splurt Splurt :)

Murrrr :3

Guard#52 said:
...Anyone notice that the first shot doesn't come back...?

It flys off screen

I can do it it just stick to the silin for a while and then I rilize it because on the smell

Atomizer said:
Removed female and human tags and added ambiguous_gender tag. Tag what you see.

On the contrary, Latias is an exclusively female pokemon, so added female tag

Beautiful

Latias Is Female Only

ippiki_ookami said:
tag what you see, not what you know

that's a dumb rule. if i know more that i can see and tag it,
other people can then find it easier due to there knowledge and the correct tags.

Lol flipnote

Those claws, She must be tender while doing this, or else when she was going fast, one of her claws could have pierced the skin.

kind of like getting a blowjob with something with fangs, lot's of trust and careful skill.

Lovely

I'm aware this is an old post, but I feel the need to point this out, since I don't dare touch tags, myself:

The tags:
"human_on_feral", "human_penetrating_feral", "interspecies", "male/female", "male_penetrating_female", and "smaller_penetrated"

and

"autofellatio", "masturbation", "oral_masturbation", and "penile_masturbation"

don't mix when given the context of this image. The Pokémon shown here is a Latias. Latinas is canonically female. This cannot be autofellatio or masturbation if the only character shown here is a female interacting with a penis and is not tagged as a hermaphrodite. For that matter, tagging this as having a human, based on the Tag-What-You-See rule, is also incorrect. This post--and its parent--is really messed up when it comes to the tags. I see no human, I see a female, I see a penis. Tagging this with both "autofellatio" and "male_penetrating_female" and not "herm" while there's only one seen character and one disembodied penis and the only sexual act is fellatio is completely contradicting.

Sorry for the rant. I'm not upset by this image or getting it as a result of my search. I'm just annoyed at the inconsistencies that this site has when it comes to tagging posts correctly.

Wow this us so hot