He sort of has pants :P

Just as much as her anyways :O

CamKitty said:
He sort of has pants :P

Just as much as her anyways :O

But he has no shirt, so.....

CamKitty said:
Just as much as her anyways :O

Loincloth is a bit different from a skirt. It exposes way more butt, for one thing.

Wait... so that means it's fine for them to have their...

>.>

<.<

...their feet uncovered?!

...I think I'm gonna be sick.

cr1ms0nt1ger said:
Wait... so that means it's fine for them to have their...

>.>

<.<

...their feet uncovered?!

...I think I'm gonna be sick.

IKR? HOW LEWD!

Lycaon0008 said:
That was racist, but you're right!

"There are only two things I can't stand in this world: people who are intolerant of other people's cultures... and the Dutch."
~ Nigel Powers, Goldmember

cr1ms0nt1ger said:
Wait... so that means it's fine for them to have their...

>.>

<.<

...their feet uncovered?!

...I think I'm gonna be sick.

That's basitins

No Shirt No

No Pants Service!

All the while the brothel at the other end of the village has the sign

No shirt
No pants
Full service

LOL reminds me of a restaurant I went to, and while my date and I waited for a booth, the guy in front of us was getting a loaner jacket, and tie.

Jacket barely fit & the tie looked like a rejection from a 70’s clothing store.

Bhaha!

😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆.

You know, the funny thing is, the ONLY reason that the “no shirt, no shoes, no service” policy exists is specifically so that businesses could legally refuse service to “hippies”