created by furryrevolution
Viewing sample resized to 91% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • King30 said:
    Really? How so?

    Well I shouldn't judge, I couldn't do better. I just don't like the faces in his art. The artist is obviously a bear (and not in the furry sense) so he likes the guys in his work to look... just way too rugged and manly and generally unattractive (but that's just my opinion)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • FerrisOnFire said:
    Well I shouldn't judge, I couldn't do better. I just don't like the faces in his art. The artist is obviously a bear (and not in the furry sense) so he likes the guys in his work to look... just way too rugged and manly and generally unattractive (but that's just my opinion)

    Ah I get you. That makes sense.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • FerrisOnFire said:
    Well I shouldn't judge, I couldn't do better. I just don't like the faces in his art. The artist is obviously a bear (and not in the furry sense) so he likes the guys in his work to look... just way too rugged and manly and generally unattractive (but that's just my opinion)

    I can understand the body type preference on your part, but regardless of what the artist is like or what he prefers, you can hardly relate "manly" and "rugged" to "unattractive". Gay doesn't necessarily imply that one party or even both have to be stereotypical, feminine, or anything of the sort. Definitely not here to argue, but I figure it's a point to make against the general "twink 'n' girly" image people have of male relations. A lot of people (as proof : furryrevolution's fans) drool over 'bears'.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Kelaihc said:
    I can understand the body type preference on your part, but regardless of what the artist is like or what he prefers, you can hardly relate "manly" and "rugged" to "unattractive". Gay doesn't necessarily imply that one party or even both have to be stereotypical, feminine, or anything of the sort. Definitely not here to argue, but I figure it's a point to make against the general "twink 'n' girly" image people have of male relations. A lot of people (as proof : furryrevolution's fans) drool over 'bears'.

    Fuck no I don't ever want to be thought to perpetuate gay stereotypes. I myself am not at all feminine. Masculinity is the shit. I'm just not into heavyset, hairy men, whatever their gender disposition.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • FerrisOnFire said:
    Fuck no I don't ever want to be thought to perpetuate gay stereotypes. I myself am not at all feminine. Masculinity is the shit. I'm just not into heavyset, hairy men, whatever their gender disposition.

    I feel kinda awkward now... I think me and my small waist will leave.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • FerrisOnFire said:
    Well I shouldn't judge, I couldn't do better. I just don't like the faces in his art. The artist is obviously a bear (and not in the furry sense) so he likes the guys in his work to look... just way too rugged and manly and generally unattractive (but that's just my opinion)

    I HATE when things turn in this direction, but I can't help it-that's as huge of a gay stereotype as I've ever heard! Just not as offensive as some, but definitely as presumptuous as any! There's no reason from any of his pics to assume he's a bear...that's laughable! I dunno if he's a bear or not, but to assume that cause of his work is ignorant! SO many twinks, and all kinds, love seeing big guys like that! I'm not into huge in REAL life(unless it was a real life anthro-I'd love ANY size!), but in furry art they can b hot as fuck, and the type of art I would label this as is NOT heavy/fat guys anyway, it's size difference-big Fat guys destroying smaller guys, which really isn't about the big guy at all to most people, it's about the smaller guy, and how they're getting ruined! Obviously plenty of people love the big guy part as much/more, but in general, the size diff/age diff thing is about seeing the little guy getting dominated(in fact, many even prefer the big dominant, or rapist, being really ugly/gross, and even monsters). Those r some of my favorite types(not particularly the ugly/gross), and if I drew very much, I'd draw the FUCK outta big guys abusing the fuck out of smaller guys asses, just like furryrevolution!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • still_human1020 said:

    I HATE when things turn in this direction, but I can't help it-that's as huge of a gay stereotype as I've ever heard! Just not as offensive as some, but definitely as presumptuous as any! There's no reason from any of his pics to assume he's a bear...that's laughable! I dunno if he's a bear or not, but to assume that cause of his work is ignorant! SO many twinks, and all kinds, love seeing big guys like that! I'm not into huge in REAL life(unless it was a real life anthro-I'd love ANY size!), but in furry art they can b hot as fuck, and the type of art I would label this as is NOT heavy/fat guys anyway, it's size difference-big Fat guys destroying smaller guys, which really isn't about the big guy at all to most people, it's about the smaller guy, and how they're getting ruined! Obviously plenty of people love the big guy part as much/more, but in general, the size diff/age diff thing is about seeing the little guy getting dominated(in fact, many even prefer the big dominant, or rapist, being really ugly/gross, and even monsters). Those r some of my favorite types(not particularly the ugly/gross), and if I drew very much, I'd draw the FUCK outta big guys abusing the fuck out of smaller guys asses, just like furryrevolution!

    Damn, dude. A little late on the draw there, responding to a five year old comment. I don't think any single one of my views is the same today as it was then. I don't have any problem with this artist or his subject matter. Still not a fan of how he draws faces, but who gives a fuck about my opinion?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0