jonesy hoovus and straxus created by grimart
Description

Minor Straxus design update. Not trying to shill my patreon by hiding nudes, because censoring Jonesy's snatch is canonical in that she doesn't want public eyes to see her junk. But uh... you can see it privately at Patreon. :) Everyone else's junk is free for viewing but since Jonesy's telling the story, she controls what the public sees. https://www.patreon.com/grimart - artist

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Police fanatic with bullet wounds.
    I'm getting a vigilante vibe from this guy.
    Either way, I get the feeling this won't end well.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • dracotay said:
    "REDACTED"

    WUT!?

    I'm as disappointed as you, pal... So much teasing with the previous updates just to put something like this.
    I mean, characters desing and personality is pretty good and the story itself is great, but too put a censure like this at this point of the story is kinda ridiculous...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • The_Furry_Centinel said:
    I'm as disappointed as you, pal... So much teasing with the previous updates just to put something like this.
    I mean, characters desing and personality is pretty good and the story itself is great, but too put a censure like this at this point of the story is kinda ridiculous...

    i think its hilarious

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • Numbers39 said:
    Nice paywall. I'll just find a stolen version, thanks.

    i'd like to ask that you don't post publicly about doing that. It makes us lose the desire to keep drawing. Regardless of whether or not we do this for money (we don't, but money toward charity still a good cause). Comments like that make me want to stop drawing for this comic. Which I do for free. You aren't entitled to free art, nor are you entitled to seeing pixel pussy. Which you literally could just imagine as you jerk off but all the free furry pussy art in the world isn't good enough to jerk off to and spare money for some dumb comic art. :/

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • I 100% respect artists wanting to make some money for the work they do. It's not like it's easy. Completely understandable. However, when you string people along for nearly a year before slamming the toll gate shut, it's also understandable for people to be disappointed. Only censoring it once we're finally reaching the percieved apex of the story is what feels underhanded. Not the paywall itself.

    Oh, well. No real harm done, I suppose. Myself and everyone else will get over it and you'll certainly gain a few new patrons out of it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • Chypre said:
    Police fanatic with bullet wounds.
    I'm getting a vigilante vibe from this guy.
    Either way, I get the feeling this won't end well.

    He's the gang leader. Notice how close his name is to the one the robot mentioned. Also he had her dad killed. My guess is he has a memorial to all the cops he's had killed.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Trunchbull said:
    i'd like to ask that you don't post publicly about doing that. It makes us lose the desire to keep drawing. Regardless of whether or not we do this for money (we don't, but money toward charity still a good cause). Comments like that make me want to stop drawing for this comic. Which I do for free. You aren't entitled to free art, nor are you entitled to seeing pixel pussy. Which you literally could just imagine as you jerk off but all the free furry pussy art in the world isn't good enough to jerk off to and spare money for some dumb comic art. :/

    People aren't really pissed that the artist introduced a paywall. People are pissed that the artist introduced a paywall into an almost 12 month old comic. Getting really invested into the story for a whole year and then getting smacked in the face by a paywall just feels disappointing and cheap.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • Graham-Wolf said:
    People aren't really pissed that the artist introduced a paywall. People are pissed that the artist introduced a paywall into an almost 12 month old comic. Getting really invested into the story for a whole year and then getting smacked in the face by a paywall just feels disappointing and cheap.

    This seems to be the problem on the side for the viewers from what i gather. But at this moment:

    - The artist is surprised and angry and threatens with extra censorship if people leak,
    - certain viewers are surprised and angry about censorship and threatens to leak content,

    Can't we all just get along mates?
    I mean It's not like this pickle here is doing both sides any favours right now.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Graham-Wolf said:
    People aren't really pissed that the artist introduced a paywall. People are pissed that the artist introduced a paywall into an almost 12 month old comic. Getting really invested into the story for a whole year and then getting smacked in the face by a paywall just feels disappointing and cheap.

    And by smacked in the face we mean something similar to a three stooges sound effect with Curly's reaction to getting slapped yet again.

    Honestly I'm not even mad I'm more disappointed than anything else, there's been a couple times this has happened on other unrelated projects. my general reaction is mainly disappointment because I know how pissed off people get over something the longer you tease something before doing that.

    It won't be the first time its happened. I'll live, but Now I'm gonna have to put up with not scrolling down on comments unless I'm ready for drama now I suppose. Artists gotta eat too.

    Also i like this comment here:

    Werner said:

    Can't we all just get along mates?
    I mean It's not like this pickle here is doing both sides any favours right now.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • blitzdrachin said:
    People can blacklist ''censored'' for those cases o:

    Thank you. I don't normally mind censorship, it's just that I feel like it's kind of strange that nothing else was censored in this comic until now. I guess I can do a blacklist line that says 'censored grimart', though (thank you, e621 staff, for the flexibility of the blacklist).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • I thought it was censored because of camera footage that was confiscated by police because something bad is going to happen (and this is the past now?).

    But I guess it's just paywall. I'm not upset, I understand. But it had me freaked out because I'm absolutely not here for the nudes (I didn't expect any porn here, honestly). I'm here for the plot, the story.

    I'd rather it just be censored outright than look like a canon thing (despite being highly anti-censorship).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Reasons like this is why people start leaking stuff I don't approve not hate this decision but it gets easier to see why leaks happens

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I feel as if this would have gone over better had the artist made it known on one of the earlier pages that this might/would happen, but I guess that's just the benefit of hindsight.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • The_Furry_Centinel said:
    I'm as disappointed as you, pal... So much teasing with the previous updates just to put something like this.
    I mean, characters desing and personality is pretty good and the story itself is great, but too put a censure like this at this point of the story is kinda ridiculous...

    yeah im on ur side on this that really fucking bullshit on that but i guess he/she has to get money some how it is still upseting i dont have money ๐Ÿ˜ข

    The_Furry_Centinel said:
    I'm as disappointed as you, pal... So much teasing with the previous updates just to put something like this.
    I mean, characters desing and personality is pretty good and the story itself is great, but too put a censure like this at this point of the story is kinda ridiculous...

    The_Furry_Centinel said:
    I'm as disappointed as you, pal... So much teasing with the previous updates just to put something like this.
    I mean, characters desing and personality is pretty good and the story itself is great, but too put a censure like this at this point of the story is kinda ridiculous...

    The_Furry_Centinel said:
    I'm as disappointed as you, pal... So much teasing with the previous updates just to put something like this.
    I mean, characters desing and personality is pretty good and the story itself is great, but too put a censure like this at this point of the story is kinda ridiculous...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • happy_man909 said:
    A pay wall this far into the comic? Shits tough

    Yeah. And now they're considering shutting down their patreon because of the backlash. What did they expect to get? A medal?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Trunchbull said:
    i'd like to ask that you don't post publicly about doing that. It makes us lose the desire to keep drawing. Regardless of whether or not we do this for money (we don't, but money toward charity still a good cause). Comments like that make me want to stop drawing for this comic. Which I do for free. You aren't entitled to free art, nor are you entitled to seeing pixel pussy. Which you literally could just imagine as you jerk off but all the free furry pussy art in the world isn't good enough to jerk off to and spare money for some dumb comic art. :/

    Please do stop drawing then.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Thanks for keeping up our reputation as a toxic site guys. Great work.

    Maybe someday the world will appreciate your selfless dedication to enslaving artists for free porn.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • know I'm alil late and I get the whole supporting the artist but Jesus fuck is this censorship jarring. like imagine you were watching a movie and then suddenly a big ass black box with text starts appearing over whats happening in the middle of a scene like I'm trying to pay attention to the story but there's just this black box.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I'm still not entirely sure why everyone is THAT mad about this teeny censor bar. I mean, look at the rest of this site! If you can't figure out what a pussy's pussy looks like by now, then idk what to say.

    Pay wall or not, I still think it's annoying when everybody grabs their pitchforks and torches because the artist put a little black bar over something I know what it looks like. I'm just fine with it being "canonic censorship," but different strokes for very different folks I suppose.

    Sorry for speaking my mind but it just had to be said.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1