"In Mayor Town, Sister fucks YOU!" ~The Mayor

it just keeps getting better and better!

Didn't expect the incest and intersex/intersex tags to be the ones to get removed, since the speech bubble implies it pretty plainly being Isabelle...

ihavenoidea645 said:
Didn't expect the incest and intersex/intersex tags to be the ones to get removed, since the speech bubble implies it pretty plainly being Isabelle...

Text doesn't contribute to tagged content, only what is visibly seen.
And no that doesn't catch 22.

Versperus said:
Text doesn't contribute to tagged content, only what is visibly seen.
And no that doesn't catch 22.

Not to be facetious, but under that context and "tag what you see not what you know" nothing should be able to be tagged with incest, as you'd need either prior knowledge or contextual in image text stating it. So it seems kind of unfair to make that claim, don't you think?

ihavenoidea645 said:
Not to be facetious, but under that context and "tag what you see not what you know" nothing should be able to be tagged with incest, as you'd need either prior knowledge or contextual in image text stating it. So it seems kind of unfair to make that claim, don't you think?

True, incest tags are completely contextual, it's kind of wacky, I don't have a good answer I can give you. but in the context of this post, if there was some sort of body to go with the penis giving its owner form than sure, but it's simply a penis.

Versperus said:
True, incest tags are completely contextual, it's kind of wacky, I don't have a good answer I can give you. but in the context of this post, if there was some sort of body to go with the penis giving its owner form than sure, but it's simply a penis.

Would it have helped is instead of "'Belle" the text was "Sis"? I know I can't make a new edit just for that though I wish I could, but rules but just for future reference.

ihavenoidea645 said:
Would it have helped is instead of "'Belle" the text was "Sis"? I know I can't make a new edit just for that though I wish I could, but rules but just for future reference.

see, that's still an issue of text only, effectively the site treats text in the content of a post as if it doesn't exist, beyond tags such as text, English_text, url, signature.

Though I'll be honest, as far as the content of this post it might get deleted for one of two reasons.

1. It's a merger edit, which usually get classified as a low effort edit.
2. It surpasses the sites maximum on bases with the addition of this post pushing the total ammound of this base to 6 when the max is 5.

Mind you I'm not a janitor, it's just two reasons this post could be deleted. At that same time however, if this post does get deleted you can put a link to this animation in the description or the comments of one of the other posts of this base so users can still view it.

Cum version when though? That'd be better than the original for me, ngl