created by tirrel
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
  • Comments
  • too true to form... it's almost eerie... *sigh*

    AtlasShrugged said:
    That's... so true. T.T

    ^Knows this pain^

    I used to draw, but got bogged down with da non-stop requests for... various things... >_>
    Ah the good ol' days. <=P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • Sexually charged material is generally regarded as more interesting than clean work???????

    When did this happenn??????????????????????????????????????

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • Wraywolfe said:
    Sexually charged material is generally regarded as more interesting than clean work???????

    When did this happenn??????????????????????????????????????

    puberty back in ought 4. I was walking and I felt a strange sensation. I opened my pants to realize my testicle had dropped. Suddenly breasts were tantalizing and panties even better. Best 17th birthday ever.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 38
  • Rook said:
    puberty back in ought 4. I was walking and I felt a strange sensation. I opened my pants to realize my testicle had dropped. Suddenly breasts were tantalizing and panties even better. Best 17th birthday ever.

    17 years. Wow you jumped on the train late.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Tolequiel said:
    We're all repressed. Well...I'm opening my trench coat...and revealing....a doberman giving me a blow job! Well!

    I would rather have a goat do that

  • Reply
  • |
  • -10
  • I don't think this is really true. There's so much well-drawn furry porn that people don't really gush about the lousy stuff... unless it conforms to a specific fetish of theirs.

    Standards for general porn are fairly high.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • brasht said:Standards for general porn are fairly high.

    as i see it if Ur going to draw porn draw something psychically possible, if u don't then u get flamed. i know i know... alot of the furry porn is about creatures that dosnt exist but still there is guidelines that if u fail to folow will ensure a wall of text :P

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • brasht said:
    I don't think this is really true. There's so much well-drawn furry porn that people don't really gush about the lousy stuff... unless it conforms to a specific fetish of theirs.

    Standards for general porn are fairly high.

    The point is that generic porn is generally regarded with a nigh on insane amount of positive affection from fanbases in general. Emotional pornography or clean work is generally pushed aside, and the artists that do them are often little known and struggle with self-depreciation because of it.

    Example: Wolfy Nail does artistically sound, but extraordinarily /generic/, pornography, and the fandom loses it's mind over every piece.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • The sad thing is someone recently made a tool where you can make a giant custom cock - nothing else - and it's the most popular thing ever. :-p

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Meh, that's kinda true for me? I still flip out over really well done pieces of furry art. Like some of Trickster's best pieces, I can't fap to, I just gawk and go "Holy shit, that's detailed :O"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Scruffofthewolf said:
    too true to form... it's almost eerie... *sigh*

    ^Knows this pain^

    I used to draw, but got bogged down with da non-stop requests for... various things... >_>
    Ah the good ol' days. <=P

    I know this is like serious necroing and the user doesn't even seem to use that account anymore buuut...

    Do people really think that it is ok to badger artists for nsfw requests? It's rude to make requests at all. If an artist wants to draw for others they will ask for recommendations or do commissions.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Rahkvi said:
    The point is that generic porn is generally regarded with a nigh on insane amount of positive affection from fanbases in general. Emotional pornography or clean work is generally pushed aside, and the artists that do them are often little known and struggle with self-depreciation because of it.

    Example: Wolfy Nail does artistically sound, but extraordinarily /generic/, pornography, and the fandom loses it's mind over every piece.

    ... Nailed it?

    No offense to Nail himself.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Thyne said:
    I know this is like serious necroing and the user doesn't even seem to use that account anymore buuut...

    Do people really think that it is ok to badger artists for nsfw requests? It's rude to make requests at all. If an artist wants to draw for others they will ask for recommendations or do commissions.

    Well, I accept draw requests from people on their birthdays.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Honestly I get that this comic is trying to say people will go more crazy over a pair of genitals than any well designed art, but this really just makes the guys in the 4th panel look like they're in an art gallery, contemplating a portrait displayed there. Like it's STILL good, it's just quiet appreciation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • wraywolfe said:
    Sexually charged material is generally regarded as more interesting than clean work???????

    When did this happenn??????????????????????????????????????

    Probably about 70,000 years ago.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • I'm so glad Tirrel grew out of this phase.
    Going on about how shit furries are while drawing hyper-kinky macro art.
    Glad he grew the eff up.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Omg, people like nsfw content over sfw content on a furry porn website?!?! Who would've thought?!

    Nah but like seriously, you can say that "e621 iS nOt A pOrN wEbSiTe!!! It'S aN aRt ArChIvE!!" but majority of people use this site for jacking it or looking at porn, it's just a porn website, porn is going to do better than sfw stuff.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1