autisticretard said:
A 23 year difference.

Should I let that slide? I-I don't think I should let that slide. That's pretty scary, to be honest.

a) It's 13 years, not 23. b) They're both adults, there's nothing wrong with that.

autisticretard said:
A 23 year difference.

Should I let that slide? I-I don't think I should let that slide. That's pretty scary, to be honest.

This is why math is important.

autisticretard said:
A 23 year difference.

Should I let that slide? I-I don't think I should let that slide. That's pretty scary, to be honest.

Living up to his name?

deejaydragon said:
a) It's 13 years, not 23. b) They're both adults, there's nothing wrong with that.

Yea but it means he would have been 13 at the time the son was born, which is not a good age to become a father

dragonassholelover said:
Yea but it means he would have been 13 at the time the son was born, which is not a good age to become a father

This message right here is why people should understand there brothers not father and son

deejaydragon said:
a) It's 13 years, not 23. b) They're both adults, there's nothing wrong with that.

Both are legally adults. It doesn't really matter if you let it slide or not as it is your opinion.

I find it not as bad as 50-60 years old with 20 year old trophy wives. That is a level of creepy that I personally don't like. But that's my opinion.

amareamicus said:
Living up to his name?

bro i thought it was 23 years too okay