fan character and puck (nintendo and etc) created by eto ya
Viewing sample resized to 68% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 545
  • Binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    i agree, we need to be scientific about this and observe very carefully, controlled environment, lots of cameras, and the ability to adjust variables to ensure lack of gayness.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 149
  • Binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    Since there is cum on your chest, we reject the null hypothesis because we have significant evidence that you are gay

  • Reply
  • |
  • 60
  • Binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    we also need atmosphere, can we get some smooth jazz?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 24
  • binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    What we need is a good for loop of
    For(Int i =0; i<i+1; i++)
    I think that’s a good sample

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    My minimum for gay or not is five, at least two angles and a review team in the next room

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Well, when push comes to shove, just let more guys into the room until something happens. Eventually something will happen >;3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    All I can think of is my college professor reminding us when to reject the null hypothesis using a picture of Snoop Dogg with the line "if the P is too low, the H0 must go"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • halo_haacker said:
    What we need is a good for loop of
    for(Int i =0; i<i+1; i++)
    I think that’s a good sample

    Do you think that'd cause a CumOverflow before a StackOverflow?

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • ragland said:
    Since there is cum on your chest, we reject the null hypothesis because we have significant evidence that you are gay

    Well, we can't be too sure based off of solely
    that information, since y = 4/3x + B, AKA average cock curvature which should allow the cum on his chest to be possible isn't here due to his stock eevee anatomy which is a y = 1x +b, it could not reach. This is backed up by his member currently facing down whilst hard, the cum could not have crawled onto his stomach, thus proving he is not gay.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Are we absolutely sure he isnt gay, though? Maybe he needs to be fucked a few more times to be certain.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • samurottlover said:
    What about that cum on your underside? Seems pretty gay

    ragland said:
    Since there is cum on your chest, we reject the null hypothesis because we have significant evidence that you are gay

    goodusername said:
    yes thats why there is cum on your chest.

    Guys, its PRECUM. He's PREgay! ..... I'll uh I'll just leave.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • binagon said:
    did you honestly think n=1 is a good sample size? We need more tests to be statistically certain.

    "After several tests, you have been found statistically gay."

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • halo_haacker said:
    What we need is a good for loop of
    For(Int i =0; i<i+1; i++)
    I think that’s a good sample

    Wait a second...
    Oh.
    Yeah this would just loop indefinitely then.
    I think that's a pretty good sample size. 👍

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • do1111 said:
    does the tag cum on self back up your words?

    No no, he’s got a point! Theoretically speaking we could just forget about the cock curvature being y = 1x + b. The truth lies evidently in a tag itself. The cum on self tag is hard proof in this case, harder than eevee is right now, which makes him in fact.. Gay

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • deathitself said:
    I just took a DNA test, turns out-

    I'm 100% not gay..

    lunar_abet said:
    No like judging or anything but isn't this.. Pretty much Zoophilia? I'm not smart :(

    You can call if beastiality or zoophilia if you want but no one really cares tbh

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2