nala, scar, and simba (the lion king and etc) created by malaika4
Viewing sample resized to 62% of original (view original) Loading...
  • Comments
  • hotpotatohotpo1 said:
    Searches “female penetration” get this gay shit, fix your tags asshole

    There is both a female and penetration in this picture, it's not like I tagged it female_penetrated and if you don't like seeing gay shit try adding -gay to your search

  • Reply
  • |
  • 217
  • dirtykitty said:
    There is both a female and penetration in this picture, it's not like I tagged it female_penetrated and if you don't like seeing gay shit try adding -gay to your search

    Nice burn

  • Reply
  • |
  • 25
  • HotPotatoHotPo1 said:
    Searches “female penetration” get this gay shit, fix your tags asshole

    its funny how insecure people who act like this end up obviously being gay in some way. they project so damn hard

    no normal straight person gets this upset over their sexuality getting challenged, especially unprompted. only insecure semi gays who repress their crap like this moron and lash out as soon as the question comes up

    sorry bud you gay and it aint foolin no one

  • Reply
  • |
  • 34
  • dirtykitty said:
    There is both a female and penetration in this picture, it's not like I tagged it female_penetrated and if you don't like seeing gay shit try adding -gay to your search

    Yeah tell im >:3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • hotpotatohotpo1 said:
    Searches “female penetration” get this gay shit, fix your tags asshole

    Lmao
    Ok boomer.
    How about you stop blaming others for your mistake, eh? Yeah. That’s right. Your mistake. You did not put an underscore in your keywords, thus both female and penetrating were shown; whereas if you would’ve taken the time to learn how to use this site, you would know that putting a simple little underscore between ‘female’ and ‘penetrated,’ you would have gotten females being penetrated.

    But you’re lazy and didn’t even bother learning how to use this website. Because of that, you got the search results you did. Well buddy, that’s your own damn fault. Don’t you dare blame artists and OPs for your fuck-ups. So how about you fix your tags asshole, and take that weak sauce somewhere else.

    To the artist:
    This is awesome work, keep it up!

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 17
  • How is someone “homophobic” because they don’t like gay porn? I get the guy was rude but are you kidding me!?

    Can’t even look at Simba getting pounded without two sides of toxicity

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • We need more of lions in the perching position. It's an extremely sexy position in the first place, but for lions, it looks really sexy. It fits their body type and posture to an absolute T.
    And this picture is accuruate to the actual Lion King, which I love. Lion King seems to be the best when it comes to source material accurate porn.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • xquid said:
    Scar warned Mufasa not to turn his back on him... Simba didn't heed that warning.

    In fact, Simba later in the weeks to come would purposely turn his back. Not that Scar would argue.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • entrinity said:
    How is someone “homophobic” because they don’t like gay porn? I get the guy was rude but are you kidding me!?

    Can’t even look at Simba getting pounded without two sides of toxicity

    Pretty sure it's because they're throwing a fit about having to catch even the slightest glimpse of gay porn... yet haven't even blacklisted it

    Plus you know, calling people asshole over it

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • concordokken said:
    Pretty sure it's because they're throwing a fit about having to catch even the slightest glimpse of gay porn... yet haven't even blacklisted it

    Plus you know, calling people asshole over it

    Pretty sure that’s reaching for no reason and just muddles the use of the word homophobic for people who are actually discriminating against homosexual people.

    I don’t call someone racist because they don’t like ebony porn and I damn well don’t build up the story that said person I know nothing about is in denial about their attraction to black women. Because then I would be a massive hypocrite by having such an inordinate reaction to someone who offended me because they had an inordinate reaction.

    Both sides are throwing fits, both sides are acting like children. Two wrongs don’t make a right and someone being a dick doesn’t excuse you to be dick either.

    I never see this kind of stuff pop up whenever anyone says, “Man, I wish this image was of two girls/guys.” AS IT SHOULD BE! But for this, people like you still feel the need to spout some non-existent logic 9 months later.

    Making blind assumptions about people over the internet is how you get hyper-defensive jerks who think everything is a personal attack. Quite literally all it takes is to have even a modicum of respect towards other people and think “Maybe this guy isn’t the worst thing I can imagine, but instead is sexually frustrated and spoke rashly due to said frustration.” Since you know, WE’RE ON A PORN SITE?!

    “If something can be contributed to a less severe cause, it should be.”

    -Paraphrase from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    This comment section is the epitome of unnecessary escalation and jumping to conclusions.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • entrinity said:
    Pretty sure that’s reaching for no reason and just muddles the use of the word homophobic for people who are actually discriminating against homosexual people.

    I don’t call someone racist because they don’t like ebony porn and I damn well don’t build up the story that said person I know nothing about is in denial about their attraction to black women. Because then I would be a massive hypocrite by having such an inordinate reaction to someone who offended me because they had an inordinate reaction.

    Both sides are throwing fits, both sides are acting like children. Two wrongs don’t make a right and someone being a dick doesn’t excuse you to be dick either.

    I never see this kind of stuff pop up whenever anyone says, “Man, I wish this image was of two girls/guys.” AS IT SHOULD BE! But for this, people like you still feel the need to spout some non-existent logic 9 months later.

    Making blind assumptions about people over the internet is how you get hyper-defensive jerks who think everything is a personal attack. Quite literally all it takes is to have even a modicum of respect towards other people and think “Maybe this guy isn’t the worst thing I can imagine, but instead is sexually frustrated and spoke rashly due to said frustration.” Since you know, WE’RE ON A PORN SITE?!

    “If something can be contributed to a less severe cause, it should be.”

    -Paraphrase from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    This comment section is the epitome of unnecessary escalation and jumping to conclusions.

    Does not help that people being rude on the other side were not in trouble for also being trolls lol

    kittyclitty said:
    I wish I never uploaded this fucking image

    Comments mean nothing and tons of people liked it and favourited it. Also, unless the artist is DNP someone else would have anyways

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • entrinity said:
    Pretty sure that’s reaching for no reason and just muddles the use of the word homophobic for people who are actually discriminating against homosexual people.

    I don’t call someone racist because they don’t like ebony porn and I damn well don’t build up the story that said person I know nothing about is in denial about their attraction to black women. Because then I would be a massive hypocrite by having such an inordinate reaction to someone who offended me because they had an inordinate reaction.

    Both sides are throwing fits, both sides are acting like children. Two wrongs don’t make a right and someone being a dick doesn’t excuse you to be dick either.

    I never see this kind of stuff pop up whenever anyone says, “Man, I wish this image was of two girls/guys.” AS IT SHOULD BE! But for this, people like you still feel the need to spout some non-existent logic 9 months later.

    Making blind assumptions about people over the internet is how you get hyper-defensive jerks who think everything is a personal attack. Quite literally all it takes is to have even a modicum of respect towards other people and think “Maybe this guy isn’t the worst thing I can imagine, but instead is sexually frustrated and spoke rashly due to said frustration.” Since you know, WE’RE ON A PORN SITE?!

    “If something can be contributed to a less severe cause, it should be.”

    -Paraphrase from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    This comment section is the epitome of unnecessary escalation and jumping to conclusions.

    Dw theres a few of us that agree with you. Guy handled it the wrong way but its not his fault that seeing two gay lions fucking grosses him out, its just how hes wired. With that aside, dudes still an ass in the way he complained

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • ramadan_steve said:
    Dw theres a few of us that agree with you. Guy handled it the wrong way but its not his fault that seeing two gay lions fucking grosses him out, its just how hes wired. With that aside, dudes still an ass in the way he complained

    I think most people absolutely agree the guy was a complete dick and needs a reality check. The issue is calling him homophobic because he doesn't like gay porn.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • entrinity said:
    Pretty sure that’s reaching for no reason and just muddles the use of the word homophobic for people who are actually discriminating against homosexual people.

    I don’t call someone racist because they don’t like ebony porn and I damn well don’t build up the story that said person I know nothing about is in denial about their attraction to black women. Because then I would be a massive hypocrite by having such an inordinate reaction to someone who offended me because they had an inordinate reaction.

    Both sides are throwing fits, both sides are acting like children. Two wrongs don’t make a right and someone being a dick doesn’t excuse you to be dick either.

    I never see this kind of stuff pop up whenever anyone says, “Man, I wish this image was of two girls/guys.” AS IT SHOULD BE! But for this, people like you still feel the need to spout some non-existent logic 9 months later.

    Making blind assumptions about people over the internet is how you get hyper-defensive jerks who think everything is a personal attack. Quite literally all it takes is to have even a modicum of respect towards other people and think “Maybe this guy isn’t the worst thing I can imagine, but instead is sexually frustrated and spoke rashly due to said frustration.” Since you know, WE’RE ON A PORN SITE?!

    “If something can be contributed to a less severe cause, it should be.”

    -Paraphrase from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    This comment section is the epitome of unnecessary escalation and jumping to conclusions.

    I agree with most of this, but I need to point out that "Sexual frustration" is absolutely no justification for being insulting, especially when it's his failure to navigate the site in the first place. If you don't show respect, why should you expect to receive it? And to be clear, I don't think he's being called homophobic because he doesn't like gay porn, he's being called that because of how he phrased his "distaste." I can't believe I have to explain that. If he had said "I searched for X and Y and ended up with a gay image, please fix your tags" or just pressed the back button, I doubt this shit would be happening honestly. Hopefully my guy has learnt how to actually search for tags properly now at any rate.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • slapstick70 said:
    I think most people absolutely agree the guy was a complete dick and needs a reality check. The issue is calling him homophobic because he doesn't like gay porn.

    It's not because "he doesn't like gay porn," it's because he's so enraged by it that he needs to go out of his way to announce how angry he is to everyone else.

    If I see a type of porn on here that I don't want to see I either blacklist it, refine my search, or fix the tags myself (even though in this case there was nothing wrong with the tags, he just didn't search correctly).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • addernaught said:
    …putting a simple little underscore between ‘penetrating’ and ‘female,’ you would have gotten…

    I hate to be the "um actually" guy but technically it would be female underscore penetrated &/or male underscore penetrating underscore female

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • saujen said:
    I hate to be the "um actually" guy but technically it would be female underscore penetrated &/or male underscore penetrating underscore female

    Fixed, thanks!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0