April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
[ Blacklist Help ]
You must be over the age of 18 and agree to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
JFrankParnell
MemberAnd then the company gets wiped out because a sniper plinks the two officers who were dumb enough to paint their ranks on their helmets.
SmallzBallz
MemberSend it.
Duracell
MemberThere was an interesting take on that by General Robert Eichelberger, in his memoirs of WW2. Eichelberger was in charge at Buna on New Guinea, which was an absolute jungle hellhole, and he made a point of wearing his shiny silver general's stars while he was up at the front lines, despite the Japanese proclivity for snipers and picking off officers.
Eich was big on morale, and especially considering he was leading green American troops who had maybe seen a jungle in a magazine once and were almost all fighting with malarial fevers. In his words, "How else would those sick and cast-down soldiers have known that their commander was in there with them?"
It wasn't that the danger was not understood--three other generals of 1-3 stars had already been shot at Buna, though none fatally. But sometimes the circumstances demand taking the risk.
JFrankParnell
MemberVery interesting. I was more poking fun at Hollywood films like Saving Private Ryan, where they painted the rank of Tom Hanks’ character on his helmet so the audience always knew which helmeted character was him, but which in reality would have had him most likely killed in the first five minutes of the film on Omaha Beach.
Eichelberger is a underrated Army leader. Shame people don’t give him more credit and still give too much attention to people like MacArthur.
g0ATbOI
MemberAwww, how cute!
Duracell
MemberAgreed on both points! Eichelberger is great, and I could go on for an hour about how much I dislike MacArthur, so I won't. And the rank on Hanks' helmet would have probably been a real bad idea in an Omaha situation where you're storming a comprehensive and activated defense, yeah. But there are arguments going both ways, and there have been and definitely will be so long as there's war.
Noblewolf16
Memberwisky tango foxtrot...DID I SUTTTER?? SEND IT!
Ravencroft
MemberPatterson's plan: Best case scenario, they kill Thott; worst case, they kill both of us. Acceptable.
auto5k
MemberSince when does Shepherd care about danger close
Login to respond »