That's a nice Disney rabbit, I'm not sure who he is, but I don't think he's Judy...
I wish I could pick what subtle details define male and female in anthro cartoons?

I vote for removing the Judy Hopps, Disney and Zootopia tags.
Keeping TWYS in mind there is nothing except maybe the fur pattern indicating Judy Hopps.
No Violet eyes nor black ear tips and .... (can't think of anything else right now).

Is the art style sufficient to tag Disney?

kalider said:
I vote for removing the Judy Hopps, Disney and Zootopia tags.
Keeping TWYS in mind there is nothing except maybe the fur pattern indicating Judy Hopps.
No Violet eyes nor black ear tips and .... (can't think of anything else right now).

Is the art style sufficient to tag Disney?

I don’t think art style is enough to tag Disney, considering the style used in their films changes with every project. Honestly this looks more like Song of the South or Robin Hood than Zootopia

camossdarkfly said:
I don’t think art style is enough to tag Disney, considering the style used in their films changes with every project. Honestly this looks more like Song of the South or Robin Hood than Zootopia

It "could" be that rabbit from robin hood, whatever his name is.

camossdarkfly said:
I don’t think art style is enough to tag Disney, considering the style used in their films changes with every project. Honestly this looks more like Song of the South or Robin Hood than Zootopia

Not wanting to tag Disney style, quotes two Disney animations...
Ummm...?

kalider said:
I vote for removing the Judy Hopps, Disney and Zootopia tags.
Keeping TWYS in mind there is nothing except maybe the fur pattern indicating Judy Hopps.
No Violet eyes nor black ear tips and .... (can't think of anything else right now).

Is the art style sufficient to tag Disney?

The artist tagged the image as Judy Hopps when they uploaded it to Twitter - they've obviously chosen to reinterpret the character in the style of the Disney films of the 50s/60s. The grey fur, long ears and pink nose are enough to make her Judy if the artist has confirmed it, there's no need to be pedantic.

rt_pilon said:

camossdarkfly said:
I don’t think art style is enough to tag Disney, considering the style used in their films changes with every project. Honestly this looks more like Song of the South or Robin Hood than Zootopia

Not wanting to tag Disney style, quotes two Disney animations...
Ummm...?

That is not what @camossdarkfly said. That is now how I read that. "I don’t think art style is enough to tag Disney, ..." is a general statement. And the second sentence was in regard to the shown rabbit I think, not the art style.

jockjamdoorslam said:
The artist tagged the image as Judy Hopps when they uploaded it to Twitter - they've obviously chosen to reinterpret the character in the style of the Disney films of the 50s/60s. The grey fur, long ears and pink nose are enough to make her Judy if the artist has confirmed it, there's no need to be pedantic.

Take a look at tag what you see - It is irrelevant what the artist claims what is depicted unless another condition is fulfilled - namely "2) The post must have at least SOME evidence of the claimed character and can not have any evidence that CONFLICTS with what the external source is saying ..."
IMHO just the fur coloring and the fact it's a rabbit is not enough evidence - see this discussion

wollypegger said:
It "could" be that rabbit from robin hood, whatever his name is.

And this is some conflicting "evidence".

Dunno, I'm probably a bit (too?) pedantic and I don't mind that much myself but I would like to adhere to the tagging rules of e6 as close as possible.
Granted, this looks like an edge case and I'm not too familiar with many other official rabbit characters (Disney or otherwise) so I'm not sure if there is enough conflicting evidence.

kalider said:
Take a look at tag what you see - It is irrelevant what the artist claims what is depicted unless another condition is fulfilled - namely "2) The post must have at least SOME evidence of the claimed character and can not have any evidence that CONFLICTS with what the external source is saying ..."
IMHO just the fur coloring and the fact it's a rabbit is not enough evidence - see this discussion

And this is some conflicting "evidence".

Dunno, I'm probably a bit (too?) pedantic and I don't mind that much myself but I would like to adhere to the tagging rules of e6 as close as possible.
Granted, this looks like an edge case and I'm not too familiar with many other official rabbit characters (Disney or otherwise) so I'm not sure if there is enough conflicting evidence.

I know what the rules are, thanks. When it says "conflicting evidence", I'm pretty sure it has in mind much more blatant examples, e.g. a pic of an orange fox in a Hawaiian shirt that an artist claims is Judy Hopps. Like I said, the artist is copying the art style of older Disney cartoons, but a character in a different art style is still the same character.

jockjamdoorslam said:
I know what the rules are, thanks. When it says "conflicting evidence", I'm pretty sure it has in mind much more blatant examples, e.g. a pic of an orange fox in a Hawaiian shirt that an artist claims is Judy Hopps. Like I said, the artist is copying the art style of older Disney cartoons, but a character in a different art style is still the same character.

I get what you're saying with the 'orange fox called Judy' is why TWYS exists, but by the same token, a character drawn in a different style, still needs to retain some of the specific traits that make them their own character.
For Judy Hopps these would be;
Grey fur (√)
light underside (√)
Black tip ears (X)
Four digits (√)
Three toes (√)
Purple eyes (O)
represent female (?) -this body form looks more male to me?-
So as I said in the beginning, it's a nice rabbit, looks Disney styled, maybe Zootopian, but not really Judy.
_{It's funny, I get canned for doing RP, then I get canned for not blacklisting, now I'll probably get canned for doing art critique on an art critique site \∞/}

rt_pilon said:
I get what you're saying with the 'orange fox called Judy' is why TWYS exists, but by the same token, a character drawn in a different style, still needs to retain some of the specific traits that make them their own character.
For Judy Hopps these would be;
Grey fur (√)
light underside (√)
Black tip ears (X)
Four digits (√)
Three toes (√)
Purple eyes (O)
represent female (?) -this body form looks more male to me?-
So as I said in the beginning, it's a nice rabbit, looks Disney styled, maybe Zootopian, but not really Judy.
_{It's funny, I get canned for doing RP, then I get canned for not blacklisting, now I'll probably get canned for doing art critique on an art critique site \∞/}

I dont think that the number of toes and digits will count at the moment of tagging a character xD, having in mind that there are artists that draw everything with human feet in front of a camera