perdita (101 dalmatians and etc) created by devo87
Viewing sample resized to 33% of original (view original) Loading...
  • Comments
  • mlisdreaming said:
    Don't accuse people of being zoophilies for liking certain porn. I like this piece alot and I'm not a zoophilie.
    Perish zoophilie. We don't want you here. Go get help.

    Dude, I never fuck real animals, but I won't lie to myself here, feral porns are hot, and I'm dying to see more of em.

    Also, the word you're looking for is "beastiality", I may be zoophilic, sure yes, I mean I'm literally liking an animal porn pic right now, but I don't do beastiality.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 91
  • mlisdreaming said:
    Don't accuse people of being zoophilies for liking certain porn. I like this piece alot and I'm not a zoophilie.
    Perish zoophilie. We don't want you here. Go get help.

    got something to say mate? he literally said he likes the same picture you do, and yet you tell him to get some help?

    Do the same :)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 31
  • mlisdreaming said:
    Don't accuse people of being zoophilies for liking certain porn. I like this piece alot and I'm not a zoophilie.

    "Dude, I'm totally not zoo, but damn this dog is hot."

    LOL

    On more serious notes:
    1. Zoosexuality is a real orientation. It checks all of the boxes of what constitutes an orientation, and it is not a choice.
    2. An orientation is not sex, and sex is not an orientation. Being zoosexually oriented does not mean that you have sex with animals, and having sex with animals does not mean that you are zoosexually oriented. Being zoo does, however and of course, mean that you are attracted to animals.
    3. Approximately 33% of furries self identify as being zoo, under guarantee of anonymity, according to multiple studies and polls.
    4. There is actually nothing inherently ethically wrong with having sex with an actively consenting (before and during), adult, mentally sound animal. The rules of ethical sex are fairly straightforward, and do not include species requirements.
    4a. Rules of Ethical Sex:
    i. All involved individuals are actively consenting (i.e., they're making clear their interest, they're actively participating, and they're adequately informed [i.e., informed consent; in the case of animals x humans, due to an inability to reproduce, a lack of social complications, and a lack of relevant power dynamics, there is little to be informed about excepting when the activity could result in the confiscation and execution of the animal--sadly, this is common in US states, some European countries, and most third-world countries where interspecies sex is criminalized--or when the human has a zoonotic STD--which is rare]).
    ii. All involved individuals are fully mature adults.
    iii. All involved individuals are mentally sound (i.e., not impaired by any substance or circumstance [e.g., drunk, high, overly tired, hallucinating, feverish, etc., and excepting horny for obvious reasons]).

    Pleasure is the primary driving force behind the majority of sexually reproducing animals having sex.

    Study after study reveals that yes, animals are both sentient and sapient--they think, they feel, they have emotions, they learn, they grow, they adapt, and they possess the ability to utilize logic and reason to varying degrees--particularly mammals and birds.

    Consent is also a vital aspect of their lives. Watch any animal documentary and you'll see exactly how various species give and deny consent--they tend to devote a good 5+ minutes to courtship and mating behaviors. You can also observe an animal's ability to give and deny consent with a simple test: Go up to a random dog chewing on a bone, and attempt to take the bone away (actually, don't do that, you'll more than likely end up bleeding... a lot). With that previous example, you don't even have to attempt it to know that yes, they can definitely give and deny consent, but it goes well beyond that and into more subtle territory, such as body language and vocalizations. People have a tendency to readily accept and acknowledge the fact that animals are capable of giving and denying consent when the topic does not involve sex, and then to turn around and vehemently deny it the moment that possibility is brought up.

    Animals are more than capable of telling you what they want, what they like, what they don't like, and what they don't want.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 66
  • mlisdreaming said:
    Don't accuse people of being zoophilies for liking certain porn. I like this piece alot and I'm not a zoophilie.
    Perish zoophilie. We don't want you here. Go get help.

    the fucking 180 you just pulled-

  • Reply
  • |
  • 18
  • thedemiwolf said:
    Dude, I never fuck real animals, but I won't lie to myself here, feral porns are hot, and I'm dying to see more of em.

    Also, the word you're looking for is "beastiality", I may be zoophilic, sure yes, I mean I'm literally liking an animal porn pic right now, but I don't do beastiality.

    The word you're looking for is "bestiality", you can remember this for next time by remembering it starts with "best", like "best fetish"

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • "We don't want zoophiles here!" Exclaimed a certain individual, and proceeded to masturbate to a picture of a feral dog getting fucked.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • I mean, isn't it moot anyway, because anything on e621 is artwork and can be claimed by the English and American right to express themselves? It's not like you can claim an actual sexual act took place here, besides a bunch of dudes wanking it

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • What’s baffling is someone claiming zoophilia is wrong while simultaneously jerking it to anatomically correct feral porn 🤦🏻

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5