Great models and silky smooth animation. Amazing work dude <3

You know this charr is female, right?

h0rs3 has some serious competition

This is REALLY FUCKING GOOD

laki192 said:
You know this charr is female, right?

Itried to change the tags but it's locked...

issachar said:
Itried to change the tags but it's locked...

It's actually trolling ngl.
Imagine coming to see some charr females.

But you can't see this one, because some dumbass locked the tags.

IMAGINE SOMETHING NOT HAVING HUMAN SEX FEATURES
this site is a joke

Runs like butter

jacob said:
While those of us familiar with Guild Wars lore are aware this is a female, it's been ruled that information about the sexual dimorphism of fictional species, is classified as part of "what you know," and therefor not part of "what you see." So, by site tagging standards, this is an andromorph. Please stop tagging it as if it's not. Female lore tag added to reflect the fact that it's not canonically an andromorph.

if you look at literally any other charr posts with female charrs, you would see that they're all tagged female as well. literally even the wiki help page says that they're to be tagged such!

~hiirenkolo~ said:
if you look at literally any other charr posts with female charrs, you would see that they're all tagged female as well. literally even the wiki help page says that they're to be tagged such!

For some reason there seems to be a war on this site, even in the admin team, about Charr. Unfortunately when the fighting starts it's a crap shoot on what a female Charr get's tagged as despite what the wiki states.

rekohunter said:
For some reason there seems to be a war on this site, even in the admin team, about Charr. Unfortunately when the fighting starts it's a crap shoot on what a female Charr get's tagged as despite what the wiki states.

The tagging on this site is woefully inconsistent. They say 'tag what you see!!!' and then tag clear andromorphs as 'female' because 'that's what the artist says!' or a male crow as 'indeterminate' despite the artist deliberately going out of their way to draw an internal shot and literally label male internal organs.

laki192 said:
You know this charr is female, right?

Apparently they're not aware of GW2. No boobs ? not female...

Please make a longer one is very hot and amazing

It's a case where Millcore shits all over the precedence set (and discussed to death) because they somehow see a male body here when it's clearly feminine and flatchested. It's just typical discriminatory bullshit against flatchested females :^)

Edit:
@Millcore created a neutral record for your account:
Don't be a troll. [Source]

As a reminder that any critique against her will result in her flagging you.

There are 7 unique images tagged with "charr andromorph/male", that and the scoring on the comments here should give you all the hints you need.

emmentaler said:
It's a case where Millcore shits all over the precedence set (and discussed to death) because they somehow see a male body here when it's clearly feminine and flatchested. It's just typical discriminatory bullshit against flatchested females :^)

Edit:
@Millcore created a neutral record for your account:
Don't be a troll. [Source]

As a reminder that any critique against her will result in her flagging you.

While some of the comments ive seen from you can be really harsh, i agree that you cannot critique any of the mods and issues when it comes to the inconsistency of the rules of tagging and how many users point out how other images might be incorrectly tagged according to the tag what you see rule and get punished for doing so. Ive been mostly a lurker and observer for some time and i find it interesting to go through blocked profiles and look at why some people were banned and sometimes it seems super unjustified and sometimes the opposite is the case. Compared to some of the staff at r34 xxx the staff here seem like if they dont like it your punished rather than keeping cool and trying to understand situations or if they do, they dont at least evaluate the many examples of their own hypocrisy when it comes to punishing people for creepy/roleplay comments and posts that by their rules should be tagged andro on site but arent because the character is female and flat chested. While on forum posts people argue millcore is doing most of the work, there have been people literally getting negatives for not using blacklist when they come across an image that their blacklist should have blocked, and it was for very standard and obvious tags that should have been on there, not lesser used ones, and those negatives were given by mill. It has me afraid to comment the wrong thing because i feel like i could get banned for simply doing something and me getting targeted for it while others often dont.
Edit: somehow the comment shows this as part of the quoted text, i just copy pasted my response and messed something up. The last paragraph was my own response

accelerated_acidity said:
Edit: somehow the comment shows this as part of the quoted text, i just copy pasted my response and messed something up. The last paragraph was my own response

the comments get ceborked with the formating the more users are quoted in the comment, it's to due with the [quote] formating.

This isn't an intersex, nor is it a andromorph.

This is a female Charr, who is having a very good time by the looks of it.

Why is it being tagged as intersex? That's not correct.

I get some people are into / not into guys with vaginas, but just because it's flat chested doesn't make it a guy with a vagina, nor someone who is intersex.