james created by truegrave9
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • FurryHugz said:
    I like this, but that human penis is really bugging me. Besides that, I really love it.

    Human penis makes more sense than dog cock. Anthro animals have human internal organs anyway.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Sykes said:
    Human penis makes more sense than dog cock. Anthro animals have human internal organs anyway.

    I guess, but is there any official guide lines to making an accurate looking anthro. I've seen a ton of styles, and all come out differently.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • FurryHugz said:
    I like this, but that human penis is really bugging me. Besides that, I really love it.

    I like human penises better. Just my opinion.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • CatBoi said:
    I like human penises better. Just my opinion.

    I do too, but only on specific animals or at least depending on the art style I find it attractive.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • FurryHugz said:
    I guess, but is there any official guide lines to making an accurate looking anthro. I've seen a ton of styles, and all come out differently.

    There is no such thing as an "accurate looking anthro", so the phrase doesn't really make any sense. It's the same as asking for "good music". The definition of what is "good" differs so vastly bewteen individuals that you can't really have a clear-cut definition. It's a matter of personal preference.

    Although if you want to be technical, any object or creature exhibiting distinctly human characteristics would qualify as an "accurate anthro", even though it would be in a very vague sense. Which is kind of contradictory, yet makes sense.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • MTGNerd said:
    There is no such thing as an "accurate looking anthro", so the phrase doesn't really make any sense. It's the same as asking for "good music". The definition of what is "good" differs so vastly bewteen individuals that you can't really have a clear-cut definition. It's a matter of personal preference.

    Although if you want to be technical, any object or creature exhibiting distinctly human characteristics would qualify as an "accurate anthro", even though it would be in a very vague sense. Which is kind of contradictory, yet makes sense.

    That makes sense I guess. Thank you for the detailed reply, still learning around here. Hope to run into you again sometime, sorry I turned this into more of a wall of discussion. I hope to improve.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0