You can not view this image.

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Description

BEGONE, THOT.

~10 high res pages early release on https://patreon.com/grimart

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Why is she shaved? Considering she's got the hots for young human boys I'm guessing she likes the idea of being more "human" herself but it still looks really odd. And must be a lot of work.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • vladspellbinder said:
    Why is she shaved? Considering she's got the hots for young human boys I'm guessing she likes the idea of being more "human" herself but it still looks really odd. And must be a lot of work.

    It’s a lady in a partial fursuit

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • vladspellbinder said:
    Why is she shaved? Considering she's got the hots for young human boys I'm guessing she likes the idea of being more "human" herself but it still looks really odd. And must be a lot of work.

    its basically a human wearing a live fursuit in a way, anyways this comic is about grooming obviously and the **massive** problem the furry community has with pedophiles and sexual things of children, hell even here on this website with cub, loli, and shota, i just wish our fandom was better, now sometimes i just wander if most or alot of the fandom is just hypersexual or into children :/, because alot of furrys ive met are well hyper sexual and some of them were into children, there just, needs something to be done about this issue for once, so im glad Grimart is making a comic about grooming in our fandom and bringing it up to light.
    (ik the hypersexual part was off-topic my bad, but i feel like thats an issue to, with our fandom being really to lewd at times)

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • wolf123_ said:
    Hehe right thats why ya watch furry porn

    heh? i dont watch porn at all honestly lol, used to be addicted to it badly but ive improved

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • This comic covers such an awful topic to think about, and yet I keep coming back to read the next page. I can't tell how I feel about it

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • ogtariq said:
    its basically a human wearing a live fursuit in a way, anyways this comic is about grooming obviously and the **massive** problem the furry community has with pedophiles and sexual things of children, hell even here on this website with cub, loli, and shota, i just wish our fandom was better, now sometimes i just wander if most or alot of the fandom is just hypersexual or into children :/, because alot of furrys ive met are well hyper sexual and some of them were into children, there just, needs something to be done about this issue for once, so im glad Grimart is making a comic about grooming in our fandom and bringing it up to light.
    (ik the hypersexual part was off-topic my bad, but i feel like thats an issue to, with our fandom being really to lewd at times)

    As long as they're aware of the difference between fiction and reality, and keep a very clear line not to be crossed, I don't see any problem. It's a fetish; extreme, yes. But one nonetheless.

    Grooming in the other hand is a crime and should be repudiated and punished.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • The ‘Fox’ talks with two different text boxes. One is white and black text while the other is black with white text.
    I’ll go back and look, but for this page when it’s the Black bubbles it seems to be when it’s more grooming? I can’t really articulate what I’m trying to say here, maybe someone else can.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • evellon said:
    As long as they're aware of the difference between fiction and reality, and keep a very clear line not to be crossed, I don't see any problem. It's a fetish; extreme, yes. But one nonetheless.

    Grooming in the other hand is a crime and should be repudiated and punished.

    idc much if someone has a fetish, just as long as its moral and legal, and not disgusting like scat or watersports or sumin, but i don't think them having a live fur-suit is the fetish part- its symbolization of something that's hard to explain, ig its symbolization of a furry? idfk

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ogtariq said:
    idc much if someone has a fetish, just as long as its moral and legal, and not disgusting like scat or watersports or sumin, but i don't think them having a live fur-suit is the fetish part- its symbolization of something that's hard to explain, ig its symbolization of a furry? idfk

    Sorry to get off-topic, but what's sumin ?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ogtariq said:
    idc much if someone has a fetish, just as long as its moral and legal, and not disgusting like scat or watersports or sumin, but i don't think them having a live fur-suit is the fetish part- its symbolization of something that's hard to explain, ig its symbolization of a furry? idfk

    The thing with fetishes is that nobody chooses them. One day they just realize they're attracted to "X" subject. Then comes in the moral of said person to decide if said fetish is doable in the real life. My moral is "live and let live". If said fatish meant doing harm to another, then I would look for ways to satisfy it without involving other people. That's the line that separates a kinky person, no matter how disgusting it may be to the "normal" people, from a CRIMINAL.

    Ar for the fursuit, it's because the artist is sending a message of awareness about grooming within the furry community. The expressions seem to be a representation of what the child sees, or a way to represent the manipulation and malice of the character to the viewer, like the dark and sketchy background in her side, or her black dialogue bubbles.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • nyarlabrotep said:
    The ‘Fox’ talks with two different text boxes. One is white and black text while the other is black with white text.
    I’ll go back and look, but for this page when it’s the Black bubbles it seems to be when it’s more grooming? I can’t really articulate what I’m trying to say here, maybe someone else can.

    Yeah, i think the black bubbles are to help the reader pinpoint when she’s saying things to Leto that are pedophilic in nature.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • evellon said:
    The thing with fetishes is that nobody chooses them. One day they just realize they're attracted to "X" subject. Then comes in the moral of said person to decide if said fetish is doable in the real life. My moral is "live and let live". If said fatish meant doing harm to another, then I would look for ways to satisfy it without involving other people. That's the line that separates a kinky person, no matter how disgusting it may be to the "normal" people, from a CRIMINAL.

    Ar for the fursuit, it's because the artist is sending a message of awareness about grooming within the furry community. The expressions seem to be a representation of what the child sees, or a way to represent the manipulation and malice of the character to the viewer, like the dark and sketchy background in her side, or her black dialogue bubbles.

    you dont have, to act on a fetish. or like it, if in your brain you like it, you yourself dont have to like it or act on it. Also the thing you said for the fursuit i agree with, thanks for explaining

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • vilmy21999 said:
    Sorry to get off-topic, but what's sumin ?

    stuff thats illegal or can harm you mentally, psychically, (except for spanks or whips or minor psychical stuff) or stuff thats borderline disgusting, examples are stuff like farts, scat, gore, throw up, watersports, cub, loli, shota, child porn. bestiality/zoophilia, incest, ETC. so now you know what i mean, though this is my personal opinion but I also still suggest people not to do these things Scat, throw up gore, (farts i think to) watersports, and anything child related(obviously), ETC. are even mental illnesses from what I've seen on the internet and heard from friends.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • ogtariq said:
    you dont have, to act on a fetish. or like it, if in your brain you like it, you yourself dont have to like it or act on it. Also the thing you said for the fursuit i agree with, thanks for explaining

    Maybe. But if someone likes something and does it without bothering anyone, that's a purely private activity and as such, neither you or me have the right to say anything about it.

    I see your point and I respect your opinion, but I do not share it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • evellon said:
    Maybe. But if someone likes something and does it without bothering anyone, that's a purely private activity and as such, neither you or me have the right to say anything about it.

    I see your point and I respect your opinion, but I do not share it.

    i understand, as long as it dont bother me im good unless its zoophillia
    or child related then we got a problem

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • brokenthyroid said:
    Yeah, i think the black bubbles are to help the reader pinpoint when she’s saying things to Leto that are pedophilic in nature.

    Yup, I think Grim even confirmed that they made the textboxes to red flags black with white text as this sort of stuff seems to go right over folks head without making it obvious. (Especially when grooming seems to get shoved to the side if it's a woman doing it. x.x I kinda like the tactic Grim used here, it's subtle enough but also enough to tell "Oh shit what Reth's saying is bad")

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • endor-7th said:
    Off topic, I just realized she has a tail... and if she is indeed a person then... oh dear.

    I just read through the comments and didn't know someone ed this already lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0