the treachery of images created by dark violet
Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

The Treachery of Furry Porn

The famous dog cock. How people reproached me for it! And yet, could you suck my dog cock? No, it's just a representation, is it not? So, if I had written on my picture 'This is a dog cock', I'd have been lying!

- Mirror Universe René Magritte

A little over four years ago, I thought that the world needed a bit of humour - and a lot of dog cock. Or at least, pictorial representations, so the philosophy goes.

And fresh off a truly shit year, with nights still long, and while the light at the end of the tunnel is bright it can seem so very far away at times... I think we can go for some of that again.

Enjoy~
________

With thanks to Nicobay for translation assistance!
Based on 'The Treachery of Images' by René Magritte

Blacklisted
(help)
  • Comments
    •
    Show all comments

    furry4ever

    Member

    toradrow777 said:
    I don't really understand surrealism. Give me Renaissance, give me impressionism.

    I don't see anything "surreal" about this...looks more like an illustration in a veterinary textbook. If anything, this is more in the realm of "photorealism".

    And I agree...canine cocks rule!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    SissyFox

    Member

    furry4ever said:
    I don't see anything "surreal" about this...looks more like an illustration in a veterinary textbook. If anything, this is more in the realm of "photorealism".

    And I agree...canine cocks rule!

    It’s surrealist because of the text, which is a reference to “this is not a pipe”
    The concept itself is to make a point about how the work is a illustration of an object and not the object itself.
    “This is not a dog cock” is playing on this concept, as it’s not a dog cock it’s a digital illustration meant to represent one

  • Reply
  • |
  • 69
    •

    buruh

    Member

    sissyfox said:
    It’s surrealist because of the text, which is a reference to “this is not a pipe”
    The concept itself is to make a point about how the work is a illustration of an object and not the object itself.
    “This is not a dog cock” is playing on this concept, as it’s not a dog cock it’s a digital illustration meant to represent one

    also here's a link to the image referred

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    BlueMoonstruckWolf

    Member

    furry4ever said:
    I don't see anything "surreal" about this...looks more like an illustration in a veterinary textbook. If anything, this is more in the realm of "photorealism".

    And I agree...canine cocks rule!

    Illustrations in veterinary textbooks usually look rather... unsightly.
    This, however, is pleasing to the eyes~

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
    •

    Makkabbo

    Member

    marsuhammas said:
    Going to uni wasn't a mistake, because now I understand a reference made in furry porn site.

    good on you for studying my language, the language that uses 4.20.10 for 90 ^w^

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    marsuhammas

    Member

    makkabbo said:
    good on you for studying my language, the language that uses 4.20.10 for 90 ^w^

    oh no! I don't study French! I meant that I'm familiar with the "this is not a pipe" original picture because one course about media and representations used it as an example.
    (I studied French in junior high-school for 2 years then quit because my pronounciation was bad... and because of that number you mentioned, lol)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •