watervivi said:
Why is this marked as explicit?

Let’s just say the trainer’s still there.

watervivi said:
Where?

Uh hehe take a wild guess buddy

watervivi said:
I can't see the trainer anywhere.

Can you tell me where they are.

You can see their shoes behind goodra's feets. If you have a hard time visualising it, feel free to check the Child post.

nazberry said:
You can see their shoes behind goodra's feets. If you have a hard time visualising it, feel free to check the Child post.

Oh

ngon said:
Let’s just say the trainer’s still there.

You can actually see his shoes

watervivi said:
Oh

I can actually see the mind being blown.

i feel like a post tagged "sex" and "stealth sex" should be explicit, but idk, dude

fenvulpeus said:
i feel like a post tagged "sex" and "stealth sex" should be explicit, but idk, dude

Hey, good point. True as they may be, if it ain't visible in the one image specifically, it doesn't get tagged, so I've gone ahead and removed those tags.

Should this be tagged as facesitting? This is like... whole-body-sitting at this point.