dinnersreadysoon said:
The art style is undeniably high quality but it’s really gross to me

Cool story bro

Stretchy!

Lips that grip.

gameovergameover said:
Dude owns 3 dogs too. Admitted to it on his twitter. Extra yikes from me.

Nice lie. I haven't had a Twitter presence in over 2 years, so I'm curious where you dug that up.

gameovergameover said:
Dude owns 3 dogs too. Admitted to it on his twitter. Extra yikes from me.

Bruh, no one gives a shit

fictional female character getting dicked by a fictional horse no one bats an eye, double standards

porneaux said:
but I really don't like seeing people get shut down for not being interested in what is essentially borderline zoophilia.

If people don't like it there's this handy function on e621 that allows users to remove content they don't like. It's called the blacklist. No one is interested in your after school special. Fact is, anyone could make the argument that anything furry is zoophilia. "Hey guys! It's not an animal! It's just a German Shepard that has the anatomy of a human and talks like us!" It's still modeled after a dog, which working backwards means you want to fuck a dog!

See? Pretty retarded, right? So rather than try and justify your degeneracy while condemning others, just mind you own business. You know, considering your favorites have a LOT of canine dicks. Hypocrisy much?

Imagine shitting up a comment section of a picture you don't like instead of blacklisting content you don't want to see. Holy shit.

dogbitch said:
Cool story bro

comment smashed lol

mentos said:
feral: good
that haircut: not good

Speak for yourself, it's sexy as fuck!

dinnersreadysoon said:
The art style is undeniably high quality but it’s really gross to me

https://e621.net/posts?tags=fav%3AdinnersReadySoon+cub+fav:dinnersReadySoon
bestiality
You literally have men receiving feral horses, women fucking dogs and cub in your favourites.

porneaux said:
since this seems to be the topic at hand -- I don't really like that designing fictional animal genitalia after real animal genitalia is the norm. furries keep justifying this kind of thing by saying "it's all fictional, it's all fantasy" -- you can make that argument when a dog person is exceptionally humanoid and cartoonish. but this character in question is dangerously close to a real dog. for example, this artist finds the concept of dog pussy hot. they wouldn't have drawn it that way otherwise. it's the same thing when artists draw rape, or sex with underage characters. I'm not kinkshaming, and I'm aware of the psychological separation between fantasy and reality. but I really don't like seeing people get shut down for not being interested in what is essentially borderline zoophilia. oh, but the dog can talk, so it's ok guys! oh, it's just lines on paper so it's ok guys! haha!leave your downvotes at the door, thank you for reading

https://e621.net/posts?tags=fav%3Aporneaux+canine_pussy

Imagine being so insecure about the images you like, that you feel the need to shitpost in a comment section of someone else's images.
Hypocrite twat.

gameovergameover said:
Dude owns 3 dogs too. Admitted to it on his twitter. Extra yikes from me.

You have literally not once added anything of value to the comments section. Why don't you stay in your little cringe bubble on twitter and keep it to shitty 140 character limited comments there?

porneaux said:
I really don't like seeing people get shut down for not being interested in what is essentially borderline zoophilia.

No one's getting shut down for not being interested in this. They're getting shut down for coming *here* to complain about it. This is like defending someone going to an anime convention to bitch about how anime sucks because "they shouldn't be shut down for not being interested in anime!"

I'm not kinkshaming, and I'm aware of the psychological separation between fantasy and reality.

Both of those statements are directly contradicted by almost every other sentence in your comment. https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/010/566/060.jpg

k4rn4ge911 said:
Speak for yourself, it's sexy as fuck!

I used to think that dog hairdressers weren't necessary for a functioning society, but now I'm convinced that they're essential workers.

This is pretty good.

gameovergameover said:
All I remember was reading it on there. I'll take a prowl through the way back machine but your account is banned so.
Still, the thousand year old loli excuse doesn't stand on its feet either- not even the harkness test wouldn't want anything to do with this.

https://youtu.be/_vdpyGigU84?t=52

porneaux said:
since this seems to be the topic at hand -- I don't really like that designing fictional animal genitalia after real animal genitalia is the norm.

1390 of your almost 9000 favs include the tag 'animal_genitalia.'

gameovergameover said:
Still, the thousand year old loli excuse doesn't stand on its feet either- not even the harkness test wouldn't want anything to do with this.

The Harkness Test has 3 criteria. Does it have roughly human intelligence, can it communicate with language in some fashion, and is it sexually mature. The dog in the picture clearly fits 2 of those and there's nothing that indicates she doesn't also fit the third. What ARE you talking about?

Lol, this comment section is a riot, people are getting absolutely destroyed.

Who else here uses mobile and ends up clicking the report instead of reply. Im gonna get my account locked for miss use of report xD

gilbeday365 said:
Who else here uses mobile and ends up clicking the report instead of reply. Im gonna get my account locked for miss use of report xD

I did on accident lol but they were very understanding

killa-queen said:
Remember gentlemen, anyone with an opinion on e6 that isn't praising the artwork is sent immediately to downvote hell without question.

we can start with you
:)

I just don't get the outrage, art doesn't have to reflect an artist's real life practices or views, it happens all the time on videogames, movies and what not.

Love this! Nice work Halbean!

gameovergameover said:
Still, the thousand year old loli excuse doesn't stand on its feet either- not even the harkness test wouldn't want anything to do with this.

Actually the excuse stands perfectly fine on its feet, it removes the only moral objection you should be capable of having over it: the fact that it would depict a fictionally normal young character that wouldn't be able to give informed consent. A thousand year old person clearly can give informed consent, so if anyone has nothing to stand on, it would be you.
Regardless, it's art and fiction, and the only person who conflates it with reality is you.

I love this character. Nice work.

killa-queen said:
[a paragraph about how most people find this gross so you shouldn't fight with them]

As I said in a previous comment, we're not waging war on everyone on the internet who thinks bestiality is gross. The reason for the intense negative reaction is that they're coming *here* to say this crap. Going to the comment section on fetish art to talk about how you find this fetish disgusting is fucking annoying to people who are here because they like this stuff.

k4rn4ge911 said:
Speak for yourself, it's sexy as fuck!

Facts, it's one of the best parts.

dogbitch said:
As I said in a previous comment, we're not waging war on everyone on the internet who thinks bestiality is gross. The reason for the intense negative reaction is that they're coming *here* to say this crap. Going to the comment section on fetish art to talk about how you find this fetish disgusting is fucking annoying to people who are here because they like this stuff.

Couldn't have said it better myself, respect.

killa-queen said:
Humans are among the only mammals that have a minority of them that are sexually attracted to organisms of other species. You have to understand, these reactions are normal, they shouldn't be taken as offensive to you as a person; you're only going to find yourself running in circles, bouncing from internet argument to internet argument. It's not worth it.

Send me to downvote hell if you want, but I've said what I've said.

actually "reproductive interferance" is a more common atrocity among higher mammals than people would think :/

not that its ok just that its more common than one would think

especially those damn dolphins, sealions, and seaotters,
theres even been scientific papers on this bullshit DX

Shit, im a sick bastard, but pepper is so hot

Oh hey look, art.

Damn i was just looking for good porn and stumbled on a battlefield. Anyway how are yall's days going?

unwornseal said:
Damn i was just looking for good porn and stumbled on a battlefield. Anyway how are yall's days going?

I know right? Like damn. Just let people look at what they want to look at. Its really annoying. The simple answer to it is something e6 added.

Its called Blacklist.

People these days. :|

porneaux said:
this character in question is dangerously close to a real dog.

yeah bro my dog has that same hairstyle 🙄

1234pistol said:
yeah bro my dog has that same hairstyle 🙄

And it speaks fluid English, clearly having human-level intelligence and understanding of what is going on.
Besides, even as I like this kind of art with a sapient feral, the thought of screwing a real animal is still extremely gross to me.
It's passable to me as long as it's on what I'd call the "anthro spectrum", in this case a human level of intelligence in a non-human body, but not completely devoid of human traits.

ajipro said:
"How did they catch you in 4k?!"

They didn't. They were lying to stir shit up.

zeke_yeen said:
I know right? Like damn. Just let people look at what they want to look at. Its really annoying. The simple answer to it is something e6 added.

Its called Blacklist.

People these days. :|

But then they couldn't get their cancellation dopamine!

dinnersreadysoon said:
The art style is undeniably high quality but it’s really gross to me

ironic since that Goh and Sylveon pic is in your favorites...

Why is "sapient_feral" just defaulted into the "feral" tag when I try to enter it?

There should be a tag to differentiate between a normal animal, and one that has human-level intelligence and can talk.

porneaux said:
since this seems to be the topic at hand -- I don't really like that designing fictional animal genitalia after real animal genitalia is the norm. furries keep justifying this kind of thing by saying "it's all fictional, it's all fantasy" -- you can make that argument when a dog person is exceptionally humanoid and cartoonish. but this character in question is dangerously close to a real dog. for example, this artist finds the concept of dog pussy hot. they wouldn't have drawn it that way otherwise. it's the same thing when artists draw rape, or sex with underage characters. I'm not kinkshaming, and I'm aware of the psychological separation between fantasy and reality. but I really don't like seeing people get shut down for not being interested in what is essentially borderline zoophilia. oh, but the dog can talk, so it's ok guys! oh, it's just lines on paper so it's ok guys! haha!leave your downvotes at the door, thank you for reading

The main issue with zoophilia is consent in the eyes of the law. The ability to talk would add a huge justification of that. Considering humans have evolved from other animals how long till another human becomes so different in diversity that we label that as zoophilia too?

Canine genitalia is the exact same weight as adding ears or a tail its a feature of that animals anatomy.
The love of those features is no different to loving any other part. Many have foot fetishes and a lot of the community as well as furry charecters have paws. By association wouldn't that make it the same argument as the genitalia as its attraction to the paws and at that point everything might as well be labeled.

People who get locked up often receive punishments that have no actual effect on the crime committed and only serves to take away all the good things that are in someones life.

Take away the good and you leave them with the worse.
Example, someone plays a shooting game and gets put in prison for it.
They cannot redeem themselves from that fully they are on a list which will be that way for the rest of there life.
So you then leave them with the easier option to go deeper into that. Can't get a job, at that point why not just become a hitman or steal.

To have someones whole life turned upside down over something as silly as a photo and fantasy seems like a waste of time when there are so many animals actually being abused and not just sexually. Do you honestly believe that if this was a problem that the law should focus on this over animals being stabbed?

Many furries are animal lovers but they actually care about the animal 99% of them are not even after sexual relations with an animal. Fantasy can be often more appealing too.

It could be the same argument with Anime and have young characters are.

I feel at this point if its drawn or written and on the internet and no ones forced to go to the website then it should be allowed.

I think were really lucky to have talented furs in the community who can even draw to this detail. E621 has a little of everything for everyone without having any real live animals. I enjoy the freedom for everyone to express themselves and honestly the talking part of this is a fair bit part for me

gilbeday365 said:
Who else here uses mobile and ends up clicking the report instead of reply. Im gonna get my account locked for miss use of report xD

I feel ya. XDDDDD

dogbitch said:
As I said in a previous comment, we're not waging war on everyone on the internet who thinks bestiality is gross. The reason for the intense negative reaction is that they're coming *here* to say this crap. Going to the comment section on fetish art to talk about how you find this fetish disgusting is fucking annoying to people who are here because they like this stuff.

That's the point, they somehow thinks anoying people here will let them win, aka 5 year old logic

vulpix97 said:
The main issue with zoophilia is consent in the eyes of the law. The ability to talk would add a huge justification of that. Considering humans have evolved from other animals how long till another human becomes so different in diversity that we label that as zoophilia too?

Racists already do that. People have been lynched for dating outside their race while the mob leader rants about bestiality. Tells you a lot about people who want to control others sexualities.

killa-queen said:
Hm, well. This certainly became a bit of a riot. Let's all be civil about this.

If you don't like feral, blacklist it. It's understandable that you'd be disgusted by it, it is very taboo and most people consider it disgusting. You're not wrong for thinking it is disgusting: that's your opinion, it CAN'T be wrong. But you also should understand that no animals are harmed in the making of these images. They're harmless, and frankly, a more healthy way for people who like feral to get their rocks off compared to looking at actual zoophilia porn, having sex with an animal, and god forbid, forcing themselves onto one. Don't leave a comment saying it's disgusting, just add the feral tag to your blacklist and move on with your day. It's not worth the heat.

People who do like feral, you have to understand that negative reactions to this stuff is normal. It's not only extremely taboo in society, but intercourse with actual animals is illegal in many states in the US, and in quite a number of places across the world. Not only that, but cross-species intercourse is unnatural (in the context of nature). Humans are among the only mammals that have a minority of them that are sexually attracted to organisms of other species. You have to understand, these reactions are normal, they shouldn't be taken as offensive to you as a person; you're only going to find yourself running in circles, bouncing from internet argument to internet argument. It's not worth it.

Send me to downvote hell if you want, but I've said what I've said.

I think that this guy know what he is talking about yes feral is not the greatest fetish and we need to have that in mind after all is simulating the sex with an animal in a fantasy but you don't have to talk shit if no animal gets harmed.
All of us we can say that trying to have sex with an animal in real life is wrong, it hurts the animal is inmoral and the animal dosn't have any way to consent.
But liking these images and enoying this just as a fantasy is totally fine as long as you don't think about imitate these actions in real life

porneaux said:
since this seems to be the topic at hand -- I don't really like that designing fictional animal genitalia after real animal genitalia is the norm. furries keep justifying this kind of thing by saying "it's all fictional, it's all fantasy" -- you can make that argument when a dog person is exceptionally humanoid and cartoonish. but this character in question is dangerously close to a real dog. for example, this artist finds the concept of dog pussy hot. they wouldn't have drawn it that way otherwise. it's the same thing when artists draw rape, or sex with underage characters. I'm not kinkshaming, and I'm aware of the psychological separation between fantasy and reality. but I really don't like seeing people get shut down for not being interested in what is essentially borderline zoophilia. oh, but the dog can talk, so it's ok guys! oh, it's just lines on paper so it's ok guys! haha!leave your downvotes at the door, thank you for reading

How did you find this? No, seriously. How!? What tags did you put in that this comes as such a surprise? You can turn off feral characters if you don't want to see them. Just add -feral to your search. Or, better yet. Just click back if it's not something you're into. Find what tags set this image apart and blacklist them.

"Owns real dogs and makes feral nsfw stuff" how you relate the two concepts?

You don't understand the difference between fiction and reality?
The problem is YOURS then.

wildbandit365 said:
I just don't get the outrage, art doesn't have to reflect an artist's real life practices or views, it happens all the time on videogames, movies and what not.

.. I'l need to know what happend here.