Don't worry bro, if it wasn't for furry logic you'd probably be more than she can handle

Hhmm cuckold here? I thought it was a threesome

Why are people tagging this "cuckold" when there is nothing in this image indicating it. Yes, the artist has been known for making a lot of cucking art, but not all of their art is cucking art. And again, nothing in this image indicates that anything cuck-related is going on so therefore the "cuckold" tag does not apply.

And if it was said elsewhere that this IS in fact a cucking image, then a lore tag should be used instead since it was indicated somewhere else other than this image.

blodhgarm92 said:
Why are people tagging this "cuckold" when there is nothing in this image indicating it. Yes, the artist has been known for making a lot of cucking art, but not all of their art is cucking art. And again, nothing in this image indicates that anything cuck-related is going on so therefore the "cuckold" tag does not apply.

And if it was said elsewhere that this IS in fact a cucking image, then a lore tag should be used instead since it was indicated somewhere else other than this image.

What?...

Almost looks like she's leading the big guy to fuck the small guy. No wonder he's worried, probably not what he had in mind when he agreed to being pegged, lol.

penton said:
What?...

I don't know what's to get confused about what I said. If I am going to be honest, I think I explained it pretty clearly.

blodhgarm92 said:
Why are people tagging this "cuckold" when there is nothing in this image indicating it. Yes, the artist has been known for making a lot of cucking art, but not all of their art is cucking art. And again, nothing in this image indicates that anything cuck-related is going on so therefore the "cuckold" tag does not apply.

And if it was said elsewhere that this IS in fact a cucking image, then a lore tag should be used instead since it was indicated somewhere else other than this image.

Because if you knew anything about zaush you'd know that the little guy is his standard-issue cuckdude. And it's zaush in general so it's a safe bet that any combination of "big tough-looking guy" and "smaller female" with another, less-tough looking male is probably cuckshit. Especially if they're dogs.

dostri said:
Because if you knew anything about zaush you'd know that the little guy is his standard-issue cuckdude. And it's zaush in general so it's a safe bet that any combination of "big tough-looking guy" and "smaller female" with another, less-tough looking male is probably cuckshit. Especially if they're dogs.

You clearly missed the part where I said: "Yes, the artist has been known for making a lot of cucking art, but not all of their art is cucking art. And again, nothing in this image indicates that anything cuck-related is going on so therefore the "cuckold" tag does not apply."

Tagging on this site doesn't work on "safe bets," assumptions, or any knowledge obtained from outside the confines of what can be gained form this image. Just looking at this image, there is nothing that indicates that the female is in any sort of relationship with the smaller male. I don't see any rings and there isn't any spoken dialog in the image to indicate they are together. So therefore, the "cuckold" tag doesn't apply. Now, if it has been confirmed though other media, be it another piece of art or the artist directly said so themselves; then the "cuckold_(lore)" tag would apply because it was confirmed via a different source outside what can be gained from the image itself.

blodhgarm92 said:
Why are people tagging this "cuckold" when there is nothing in this image indicating it. Yes, the artist has been known for making a lot of cucking art, but not all of their art is cucking art. And again, nothing in this image indicates that anything cuck-related is going on so therefore the "cuckold" tag does not apply.

And if it was said elsewhere that this IS in fact a cucking image, then a lore tag should be used instead since it was indicated somewhere else other than this image.

Yeah, it should be under lore, there was an entire comic with the guy on the right getting cucked

Is it just me, or does the big guy on the left look like a robot?
His facial expression and posture are so rigid.

edit:
If you ask me, he looks like a combat android in standby mode.

blodhgarm92 said:
You clearly missed the part where I said: "Yes, the artist has been known for making a lot of cucking art, but not all of their art is cucking art. And again, nothing in this image indicates that anything cuck-related is going on so therefore the "cuckold" tag does not apply."

Tagging on this site doesn't work on "safe bets," assumptions, or any knowledge obtained from outside the confines of what can be gained form this image. Just looking at this image, there is nothing that indicates that the female is in any sort of relationship with the smaller male. I don't see any rings and there isn't any spoken dialog in the image to indicate they are together. So therefore, the "cuckold" tag doesn't apply. Now, if it has been confirmed though other media, be it another piece of art or the artist directly said so themselves; then the "cuckold_(lore)" tag would apply because it was confirmed via a different source outside what can be gained from the image itself.

Except, if you look at nearly any other image, like this one https://e621.net/posts/2047942?q=parent%3A2047942+status%3Aany and this one https://e621.net/posts/1503058?q=john_%28zaush%29 You'll see that they're the standard cuck and bull zaush uses. It's not a "Safe bet" it's "Zaush has used this character as his standard cuck for years and there's pictures to support it"
I just wanted to shit on zaush some more and now I'm having to skydive into his cuck pics just to prove some rando on the internet wrong. again.

dostri said:
You'll see that they're the standard cuck and bull zaush uses.

There's a joke in there somewhere, about all of Zaush's comics being cuck-and-bull stories