kathrin vaughan (twokinds) created by tom fischbach
Viewing sample resized to 87% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Description

Smug Kat

Smug cat looks down at the viewer, suggested by Floof Ball!

Nude edit 1: https://i.imgur.com/6cqS8vK.png

Nude edit 2: https://i.ibb.co/5Gd3rrJ/i.png [MIRROR]

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • shadow234 said:
    This isn't mine, but it shouldn't be lost to time and space either. Was up earlier today and removed b/c rules.

    Nude edit with pussy:
    https://imgur.com/a/xF94frQ

    Do feel free and edit the description box and add it there, that's the generally accepted place for such things these days.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • strom0x said:
    Do feel free and edit the description box and add it there, that's the generally accepted place for such things these days.

    Didn't know it was possible, will do.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • xaldir said:
    Where can I find Edits of Two Kinds please I have to know!!!!

    e6 mods banned twokinds edits, so now you've gotta go to the u18chan thread, the twokinds general on /trash/ and its discord. Some other booru sites like r34.xxx, sankaku, and pahel still have some of the older edits, but most of them where here before the sudden purge. (No warnings or anything, just yeeted them all :p )

    Sure we could link them in comments, but thats a really wonky way to do it, and checking everything for the comments/links is a royal pain in the ass.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • strom0x said:
    Do feel free and edit the description box and add it there, that's the generally accepted place for such things these days.

    No. No it is NOT accepted to add to the description box. It is only acceptable if it's part of the ORIGINAL description. So don't add it to the description. Go to your account settings and in the "About Me" section add your links to your edits. Otherwise you may get a strike.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • Found something about description rules.

    Only add the description (if any) of the original source.

    So adding anything NOT from the original source to the description is against rules. Really had to search for this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • crazyt said:
    No. No it is NOT accepted to add to the description box. It is only acceptable if it's part of the ORIGINAL description. So don't add it to the description. Go to your account settings and in the "About Me" section add your links to your edits. Otherwise you may get a strike.

    actually, adding edits to the description box is something I'm pretty sure the mooderators actually gave approval for

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • versperus said:

    actually, adding edits to the description box is something I'm pretty sure the mooderators actually gave approval for

    Only if you CLARIFY that it's a FAN edit.
    Also Imgur is one of those "Sign up to see this picture" sites. Pretty stupid to use Imgur.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • crazyt said:
    Only if you CLARIFY that it's a FAN edit.
    Also Imgur is one of those "Sign up to see this picture" sites. Pretty stupid to use Imgur.

    anything called an edit on e621 isn't done by the original artist, calling it a fan edit is simply linguistics.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • versperus said:
    anything called an edit on e621 isn't done by the original artist, calling it a fan edit is simply linguistics.

    Really? Tom adding details to the background when there's no details and color ISN'T an edit? Then what is it?
    post #2770725

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • crazyt said:
    Really? Tom adding details to the background when there's no details and color ISN'T an edit? Then what is it?
    post #2770725

    In this case that's a finished version of a sketch.
    Lets say that version is finished but there was an error that needed to be fixed, then the new version would be an update.
    If there was two different finished versions, and one had clothing one didn't it would be an alternate version.
    edits on e621 only refer to content that is changed by a third party after an artist is done with it. It shouldn't be tagged to content the artist has changed themselves. And should also not be confused with collaboration

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3