check your facts, this is not a bestiality comic, they are pokemon, bipedal but still feral

larson123 said:
check your facts, this is not a bestiality comic, they are pokemon, bipedal but still feral

Being a Pokemon doesn't mean they can't be anthro. Braixen is very much anthro with a very human-like body structure, while Charizard is generally considered closer to feral, and feral-on-non-feral sexy stuff is considered bestiality for tagging purposes.

Oh, I just remembered what these horned up pokemon reminded me of! The Condom Crusader! How they solve all problems through sex! Though, uhh... they don't seem to be wearing any sort of protection here!

watsit said:
Being a Pokemon doesn't mean they can't be anthro. Braixen is very much anthro with a very human-like body structure, while Charizard is generally considered closer to feral, and feral-on-non-feral sexy stuff is considered bestiality for tagging purposes.

Well if the bestiality tag doesn't accurately represent bestiality, what are we meant to search for if we want to find actual bestiality art?

sexygriffon said:
Well if the bestiality tag doesn't accurately represent bestiality, what are we meant to search for if we want to find actual bestiality art?

Depends on what exactly you consider to be bestiality. Anthros and animal-humanoids don't exist in reality, so our classical definitions don't work in fiction (as it is, Merriam-Webster gives the definition "sexual relations between a human being and a lower animal", however e6 doesn't have tags for "lower animal" and "higher animal", whatever that could even mean). I know some people who consider anything-on-feral to be bestiality only if the feral isn't displaying sentience/sapience (based on their personal subjective determination from the character's expression and the overall art style, this can include feral-on-feral is one looks sapient and the other doesn't), while for others sentience/sapience is irrelevant and anything human-on-non-human (including certain types of humanoids) is bestiality. For some people, it can even depend on a character's lore (e.g. a PMD-style setup, where it's feral-on-feral but one of them used to be human, could still count, or at least be uncomfortably close).

However, since a character's sentience/sapience isn't taggable, and everyone's idea will vary outside of a pure 'realistic human-on-non-sapient-feral' depiction, the site bases its bestiality tag on that most people looking for or blacklisting bestiality art would prefer the tag to include human(oid)-on-feral and anthro-on-feral, and not human-on-humanoid or human(oid)-on-anthro, so that's how it's defined.

watsit said:
Being a Pokemon doesn't mean they can't be anthro. Braixen is very much anthro with a very human-like body structure, while Charizard is generally considered closer to feral, and feral-on-non-feral sexy stuff is considered bestiality for tagging purposes.

Charizard looks like anthro to me

mikew said:
In short: having sex with a Pokemon is the same level as having sex with your pet.

In shortest short: bestiality.

Mate, they're sentient and are able to consent. At least in this comic in particular.

watsit said:
...

So, again, not the definition of bestiality. There's no humans in this picture, and as you just said webster defines it as relations between a human and an animal. I honestly don't understand why we can't use bestiality to tag actual bestiality. We have the "anthro_on_feral" tag. Isn't that good enough for tagging relations between anthros and feral without having to drag the bestiality tag needlessly into pictures like this?

(I know you have no control over tag rules on the website, I'm just bringing this up as general discussion)

To the creator: I love the design of your Charizard with those sout colored stripes and nice rod, it looks realistic. I also like the way you drew the muzzle/face with Braixen. I also like the way that vaporeon seems both like a regular creature yet also like water the way the Pokedex describes it.
I loved this comic

anguirus12345 said:
Charizard looks like anthro to me

Different people have different takes on which side of the line certain pokemon like charizard and salazzle are. It's not unusual to see semi-anthro tagged on them along with anthro or feral, since it's pretty vague.

sexygriffon said:
So, again, not the definition of bestiality. There's no humans in this picture, and as you just said webster defines it as relations between a human and an animal.

It defines it as "a human being and a lower animal". Does a sapient anthro legally count as a human being?

sexygriffon said:
I honestly don't understand why we can't use bestiality to tag actual bestiality.

Find a formal definition of bestiality that accounts for anthros, and we can discuss it. As it is, bestiality is tagged on posts which have bestiality. It's also tagged on posts that feature similar activity for which there is no standard to say technically is or isn't bestiality (and that people looking for such content likely want to see).

sexygriffon said:
We have the "anthro_on_feral" tag. Isn't that good enough for tagging relations between anthros and feral without having to drag the bestiality tag needlessly into pictures like this?

If all you're looking for is anthro_on_feral, sure. Same as how we have the human_on_feral tag, which is good enough for tagging relations between humans and ferals without needlessly excluding the bestiality tag from similar relations. Given that anthro_on_feral is commonly used together human_on_feral and humanoid_on_feral, and there isn't a formal definition which says whether anthro- or humanoid-on-feral would count as bestiality or not, having that tag cover them helps more than it hinders. The alternative would be to consider human-on-anthro to be bestiality (along with human-on-humanoid or humanoid-on-anthro), which fewer people would be for.

We will fuck this charizard with the power of friendship!

lamebud said:
We will fuck this charizard with the power of friendship!

Double boost!

lamebud said:
We will fuck this charizard with the power of friendship!

Yea

sisuthedragoness said:
Mate, they're sentient and are able to consent. At least in this comic in particular.

Well, actually, all animals are sentient. Sapience is what separates humans. I think some Pokemon are sapient, but not all.