News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

alice liddell (american mcgee's alice) created by ken wong
Viewing sample resized to 42% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted (0)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • Spicy Horse is McGee's dev studio, so it's very likely. The publisher is the same as the old one as well (EA), and considering their quality standards, it'll likely be impressive at the very least.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • EA? QUALITY STANDARDS!? HAHAHAHAHAHA!

    EA is notorious for releasing games WELL before their maturity point, with some of the shortest bug and beta testing lengths of ANY publisher. SimCity4 was a nightmare: The game was released long before they added support for common soundcards (only soundblasters were supported, not AC97/Realtek onboard, which over 80% of people now use) and specifically they do not support motherboards with VIA chipsets. (That's chipset, not CPUs.) Selectively, due to being lazy, they cut out technical support for approximately 87% of the entire world, before they even buy the damn game.

    EA is also notorious for overworking and underpaying their design teams, setting unrealistically high requirements, and failing to meet investors' demands.

    Finally, EA is a notorious micro-manager, even going so far as to fire the design team heads who >came up with the damn game< and replacing them with designers who've never even worked on the same genre.

    EA is the game publisher equivalent of 1980's Atari. You turn to them when you can't do better.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • This reminds me of Uzumaki, some Manga I read ages ago. It's awesome but fucking weird o.o

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • wyrmchild said:
    Spicy Horse is McGee's dev studio, so it's very likely. The publisher is the same as the old one as well (EA), and considering their quality standards, it'll likely be impressive at the very least.

    McGee's only great game is Alice, the rest aren't worth anything.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Morp said:
    EA? QUALITY STANDARDS!? HAHAHAHAHAHA!

    EA is notorious for releasing games WELL before their maturity point, with some of the shortest bug and beta testing lengths of ANY publisher. SimCity4 was a nightmare: The game was released long before they added support for common soundcards (only soundblasters were supported, not AC97/Realtek onboard, which over 80% of people now use) and specifically they do not support motherboards with VIA chipsets. (That's chipset, not CPUs.) Selectively, due to being lazy, they cut out technical support for approximately 87% of the entire world, before they even buy the damn game.

    EA is also notorious for overworking and underpaying their design teams, setting unrealistically high requirements, and failing to meet investors' demands.

    Finally, EA is a notorious micro-manager, even going so far as to fire the design team heads who >came up with the damn game< and replacing them with designers who've never even worked on the same genre.

    EA is the game publisher equivalent of 1980's Atari. You turn to them when you can't do better.

    Must have game of the year candidate. u mad?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Morp said:
    EA? QUALITY STANDARDS!? HAHAHAHAHAHA!

    EA is notorious for releasing games WELL before their maturity point, with some of the shortest bug and beta testing lengths of ANY publisher. SimCity4 was a nightmare: The game was released long before they added support for common soundcards (only soundblasters were supported, not AC97/Realtek onboard, which over 80% of people now use) and specifically they do not support motherboards with VIA chipsets. (That's chipset, not CPUs.) Selectively, due to being lazy, they cut out technical support for approximately 87% of the entire world, before they even buy the damn game.

    EA is also notorious for overworking and underpaying their design teams, setting unrealistically high requirements, and failing to meet investors' demands.

    Finally, EA is a notorious micro-manager, even going so far as to fire the design team heads who >came up with the damn game< and replacing them with designers who've never even worked on the same genre.

    EA is the game publisher equivalent of 1980's Atari. You turn to them when you can't do better.

    They did ok when they inherited the C&C franchise. Up until C&C4 that is.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • field_commander_A9 said:
    They did ok when they inherited the C&C franchise. Up until C&C4 that is.

    Now, like Pokemon or like Final Fantasy, its skyrocketed to oblivion...

    Oblivion's still good tho...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.