Viewing sample resized to 52% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #2425380 that has 3 siblings (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Only real complaint ive got is that the cock really isn't going in much, i think if it was going in like, two or three inches deeper it would be a vast improvement. Otherwise this is amazing

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • policedoge said:
    ... mute?

    Remember flash, how it used to autoplay and there was no way to mute tabs back then and audio controls only exsisted if flash maker coded one in?
    Yet, somehow, we are unable to click icon that's clearly speaker shaped to mute things these days.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • Kind of a waste of bandwidth; makes you wonder what was going through the artist's head. A 6-second loop would have been indistinguishable, from this. If you're going to make the video 30 seconds long, have the pace change, have her moans change, have SOMETHING happen differently to justify it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 19
  • jacob_the_mistake-ob said:
    Only real complaint ive got is that the cock really isn't going in much, i think if it was going in like, two or three inches deeper it would be a vast improvement. Otherwise this is amazing

    I swear to god that man has an arm for a penis. I keep looking at it and I can't see it as anything else but fisting

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • jacob_the_mistake-ob said:
    Only real complaint ive got is that the cock really isn't going in much, i think if it was going in like, two or three inches deeper it would be a vast improvement. Otherwise this is amazing

    Better hope your commisar doesn't catch you watching this..

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • policedoge said:
    ... mute?

    you say this like it wasn't the first thing I did... Downvote me all you want but you people have the lowest standards on this website so I'm laughing at you either way

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • zephyr_w said:
    Kind of a waste of bandwidth; makes you wonder what was going through the artist's head. A 6-second loop would have been indistinguishable, from this. If you're going to make the video 30 seconds long, have the pace change, have her moans change, have SOMETHING happen differently to justify it.

    based connoisseur

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • johnnybicc said:
    you say this like it wasn't the first thing I did... Downvote me all you want but you people have the lowest standards on this website so I'm laughing at you either way

    People downvote non-constructive criticism. If "My taste is more refined than yours" is your standard regarding arguments, you'll get no approval whatsoever. Everyone is able to use this sentence, thus making it one of the least worth assertions you can bring with you.
    This also applies to your first comment, being a less crude way of saying "The sound is crap in my opinion." It leaves the true question out of the picture: "Why is this not appealing to you ?" Of course the first response would be telling you to just mute the sound.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • nyrsit said:
    People downvote non-constructive criticism. If "My taste is more refined than yours" is your standard regarding arguments, you'll get no approval whatsoever. Everyone is able to use this sentence, thus making it one of the least worth assertions you can bring with you.
    This also applies to your first comment, being a less crude way of saying "The sound is crap in my opinion." It leaves the true question out of the picture: "Why is this not appealing to you ?" Of course the first response would be telling you to just mute the sound.

    There is more value in his unimpressive criticism, than there is in the comments of people harassing him for not writing better, and making the worse mistake of implying he's wrong. You contribute less than no comment at all. You have no place to judge.

    The sound is crap. It's the honesty that counts the most, not the phrasing. Can't improve from a lie. Zephyr W said it best. This should've been a soundless 1-second loop. Our expectations would match what we got then.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • minus said:
    There is more value in his unimpressive criticism, than there is in the comments of people harassing him for not writing better, and making the worse mistake of implying he's wrong. You contribute less than no comment at all. You have no place to judge.

    The sound is crap. It's the honesty that counts the most, not the phrasing. Can't improve from a lie. Zephyr W said it best. This should've been a soundless 1-second loop. Our expectations would match what we got then.

    We both agree that zephyr w's comment was more valuable though. I simply tell it's because he makes a constructive point. The comment I responded too didn't.
    I don't want people to tell lies. I want precise truth, in opposition to mindless criticism. Finally I did imply he was wrong, however not because I did not share his opinion, rather since he stated it as an arbitrary opinion, which logically doesn't hold any truth.
    Phrasing indeed doesn't mean anything if honesty isn't by its side. Though to be honest, thoughts are unusable without a good phrasing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2