you could fuck a dude and still be straight. it's just not the same, the irony is I last a lot longer with guys because I don't get off to it the same.

lncc said:
you could fuck a dude and still be straight. it's just not the same, the irony is I last a lot longer with guys because I don't get off to it the same.

Considering I have spoken to gay men who say the same thing about sex with women I am inclined to agree with you, as for the dude in the comic he is probably bi, since he dosent know the gender but is still aroused regardless.

lncc said:
you could fuck a dude and still be straight. it's just not the same, the irony is I last a lot longer with guys because I don't get off to it the same.

"you could fuck a dude"
"and still be straight"
You might wanna re-think that my guy...

this pic is the furry fandom in a nutshell XD

Both? Both?
Both.
Both is good.

-Miguel & Tulio, The Road to Eldorado

Looks like it might be you in the photo my dude

drogon511 said:
Considering I have spoken to gay men who say the same thing about sex with women I am inclined to agree with you, as for the dude in the comic he is probably bi, since he dosent know the gender but is still aroused regardless.

Put him in casual, men's clothes, remove makeup, and stop him from doing suggestive poses, then check again if you get a boner - I don't think it's the man part that's arousing y'all there

lncc said:
you could fuck a dude and still be straight. it's just not the same, the irony is I last a lot longer with guys because I don't get off to it the same.

"It's not gay! It's just asserting dominance!"

yashak said:
"you could fuck a dude"
"and still be straight"
You might wanna re-think that my guy...

No, it's a valid statement. Sexuality is about who you find sexually attractive and if you e.g. are straight, meaning you only find the opposite sex attractive, it doesn't actually stop you from having sex with someone from your own sex. You don't have to be attracted to someone to have sex with them, although the attraction certainly helps.

yashak said:
"you could fuck a dude"
"and still be straight"
You might wanna re-think that my guy...

No you just have to say "no homo" first and make sure the balls don't touch.

yashak said:
"you could fuck a dude"
"and still be straight"
You might wanna re-think that my guy...

It's called being a woman...

Since sexuality and self definition within it is a spectrum (as is gender), one can be straight even though having sex once or sometimes with a member of the same sex, if they define themselves as straight. The same with gay people who once, or occasionaly try it out with member(s) of the opposite sex. Since fiding out one´s sexuality and self definition can, and often require experimentation with both members of the same and opposite gender, it is perfectly normal for a self-defying "straight" or "gay" person to try out "the other thing". Since sexuality is a spectrum, their preference may slightly change in time even, or they may, later in life, explore the sex with partners of the sex and or gender they haven´t tried before. Some people know they are straight, bi, pan, gay outright, some need some experimenting to find out who does and does not attract them. Some want to try it at least once, even though they know it really isn´t their thing, some find out after trying it out, some will end up meeting with both occasionally, some will find out they are bi/pan and will end up meeting people of both sexes and/or different gender expressions on purpose, or as far as their monogamous/open/closed relationship permits, open/closed about the meetings.

Then, however, there are people/furries boasting that they are X (straight, gay, bi), "never touching a person of the same sex/other sex/other than cis people", who can become objects of ridicule when their claims get bent on reality disrupting their proclaimed certainty about their sexual attraction, as on this picture, i.e., their proclaimed sexuality get them confused when faced with stimuli they weren´t thinking of arousing, or if, in presence of other people, their claim of their self-definition is broken when confronted with stimuli that they found arousing despite their uncertainty about the object of their arousal and they are confronted with the possibility (within themselves, or by the surrounding people) that their proclaimed identity must not be actually the right one/right at each occasion (since there may be instances of some (!) people of same/other/all sexes and genders attracting that person, even though in majority of cases, the person in question is attracted to the object of the sex/gender they based their identification on and this possibility of just some people of that "other/same" sort of people confuses them and their thinking of themselves until then).

To put it simply, the picture is hillarious :3 :D

It's not gay if you dont bother checking for genitals first and just skip straight to pounding. Then for all you know he could be a flat chested girl with a deeper voice. Just ignore her tented skirt and go for it.

lncc said:
you could fuck a dude and still be straight. it's just not the same, the irony is I last a lot longer with guys because I don't get off to it the same.

I was gonna say the exact opposite. I cum WAY harder when I fuck guys

eddy_fox_crossfox said:
Since sexuality and self definition within it is a spectrum (as is gender), one can be straight even though having sex once or sometimes with a member of the same sex, if they define themselves as straight. The same with gay people who once, or occasionaly try it out with member(s) of the opposite sex. Since fiding out one´s sexuality and self definition can, and often require experimentation with both members of the same and opposite gender, it is perfectly normal for a self-defying "straight" or "gay" person to try out "the other thing". Since sexuality is a spectrum, their preference may slightly change in time even, or they may, later in life, explore the sex with partners of the sex and or gender they haven´t tried before. Some people know they are straight, bi, pan, gay outright, some need some experimenting to find out who does and does not attract them. Some want to try it at least once, even though they know it really isn´t their thing, some find out after trying it out, some will end up meeting with both occasionally, some will find out they are bi/pan and will end up meeting people of both sexes and/or different gender expressions on purpose, or as far as their monogamous/open/closed relationship permits, open/closed about the meetings.

Then, however, there are people/furries boasting that they are X (straight, gay, bi), "never touching a person of the same sex/other sex/other than cis people", who can become objects of ridicule when their claims get bent on reality disrupting their proclaimed certainty about their sexual attraction, as on this picture, i.e., their proclaimed sexuality get them confused when faced with stimuli they weren´t thinking of arousing, or if, in presence of other people, their claim of their self-definition is broken when confronted with stimuli that they found arousing despite their uncertainty about the object of their arousal and they are confronted with the possibility (within themselves, or by the surrounding people) that their proclaimed identity must not be actually the right one/right at each occasion (since there may be instances of some (!) people of same/other/all sexes and genders attracting that person, even though in majority of cases, the person in question is attracted to the object of the sex/gender they based their identification on and this possibility of just some people of that "other/same" sort of people confuses them and their thinking of themselves until then).

To put it simply, the picture is hillarious :3 :D

Sorry but I'm not going to read your essay.

and that's how i met your... parent