laura (twokinds) created by tom fischbach
Viewing sample resized to 37% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Extra Foxy Laura

What happens when Laura becomes doubly foxy thanks to the collar? Two possibilities. Suggested by Rulo6000!

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • I honestly find this more defined anthro style to be more appealing than the overly anime style Tom has stuck with over the years for characters like Flora and Kat.
    It's also kinda jarring and inconsistent when he keeps on mixing the two styles in the comic. (ie: page 901).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • rukaisho said:
    I honestly find this more defined anthro style to be more appealing than the overly anime style Tom has stuck with over the years for characters like Flora and Kat.
    It's also kinda jarring and inconsistent when he keeps on mixing the two styles in the comic. (ie: page 901).

    I feel like Keidran have taken on a more animal/less anime look in recent years, but he can't change characters like Flora, Laura, or Kat because it's such a different look and the sudden "addition of muzzle" might confuse people. But I think he also likes this style more tbh.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • Five people dislike my comment well toms simp force will always defend his dumb idiotic reason and frankly what reason was their to kill her off other then reason

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • wolffang2197 said:
    Shame idiot tom killed her off in the comic because " reasons "

    Never read it, but i assure you, its probably because all her death amounts to is a kick the puppy moment.

    Proves "the bad guyz" are evil when, thats both not how bad guys work, and more than likely not how "his" bad guys work.

    Nothings proven other than the artist inability to write, which is why you need to avoid such pitfalls, otherwise you'll just come out looking like an ass to your peers because you confuse your audiences reactions, especially the truely negative ones you should be looking into, as drama rather than criticism.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • zer0dust said:
    Never read it, but i assure you, its probably because all her death amounts to is a kick the puppy moment.

    Proves "the bad guyz" are evil when, thats both not how bad guys work, and more than likely not how "his" bad guys work.

    Nothings proven other than the artist inability to write, which is why you need to avoid such pitfalls, otherwise you'll just come out looking like an ass to your peers because you confuse your audiences reactions, especially the truely negative ones you should be looking into, as drama rather than criticism.

    Let me put it this way.

    He killed her off right?

    But what did he kill her off for?

    in slightly damned, this happens early on and the artist says she ain't coming back.

    But, nobody else dies.

    Sure except for some "bad guys", but even then thats out of self defense.

    But when she, the artist says this, this sets a precident, other characters have to die for the same reason or be revived.

    The precident being, that character got killed off for what would make her happy, proving that people who should die, including the main couple, are killed by a broken system that rewards bad behavior, the more psychotic the better.

    it provides the tension while stating whats wrong in the universe, but... nobody else dies for this reason afterward, and any "deaths" that are able to be called out are in self defense.

    Worse, it makes the main characters completely invulnerable because those consequences for failiure don't extend to the main cast at all, both because you blew your load to early, and in slightly damned's case, defined by tension before the artist knew what made the world tense

    (In chu's case descrimination, but, making certain characters gay difussed that and made her comic more unwatchable)

    So, dear faithful, those who herald thy creators name, why did this girl get killed off?

    Because if it doesn't effect the characters, as a rule set, by extension, doesn't make them killable too, well, her death is just like sakido's, is pointless.

    It just serves to kick the puppy, reinforce villiany, when in either comics case, thats never been how the villians acted by the creators own hands.

    it's both a plot hole, and a plot dampener for a character who could have been more useful by humanizing the conflict, show actual decent, corruption, or humanity from people who might not be that evil in the first place.

    But no, we got this, and im sorry for you supporters but... wolfFang and his side are right, just not articulate.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1