dungeons and dragons and etc created by niels vergouwen and third-party edit
Parent: post #2789914 that has a sibling (learn more) show »
Description

I found this on Reddit, part 3 of the "Tiddygate2021" meme (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/tiddygate2021)

This picture are not from the original artist Instagram/Facebook, someone on Reddit edited from previous pictures, and make it part 3

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • They're super-developed muscles that help the snakes/lizards open their jaws really far to consume Large Prey so if you honk on their gazongas they'll open their mouth like a trashcan :)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 25
  • I'm pretty sure D&D Lizardfolk don't come in snake. Also fairly certain those aren't boobs but are actually venomsacks.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • mcflyisachicken said:
    I don’t know why. But I read that in Omni mans voice when it sounds like something mr incredible would say.

    "Are you seriously thinking that e621 porn artists have to apply logic to their characters? THINK MARK THINK!"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • doctorbeeeeeees said:
    *insert entire 5 page rant with wiki links about why sneks don't have tiddies (but still favorite this picture anyway)*

    Well if it's hot I'm going to fav but if somebody's or something's wrong I'm going to tell them. =P

    (This has nothing to do with my opinion on titties on snakes though, I don't care one way or the other.)

    Case in point I gripe about badly done sound all the time but I particularly enjoy the mac and cheese fisting noises even though they're not 100% accurate.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Never forget, anthropomorphism means giving human characteristics. Humans have breasts. Animals that don't classically do the whole titty thing IRL, anthro-fied, = you *can* give them boobs and it's okay and makes sense, as you've supplied human features to them like speech and bipedalism anyway.

    Also: It's fantasy. It's art. We're already breaking about 10,000 rules of science and nature drawing anything like this in the first place so why not slap on some boob if that's what we like? If you DON'T want to, or LIKE the idea of breastless reptilian babes, that's cool, there's nothing wrong with that. Just don't cramp anyone's style if they DO wanna do it, cause there's about a billion reasons it's just as valid as the alternative.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • hip-porcupine said:
    Never forget, anthropomorphism means giving human characteristics. Humans have breasts. Animals that don't classically do the whole titty thing IRL, anthro-fied, = you *can* give them boobs and it's okay and makes sense, as you've supplied human features to them like speech and bipedalism anyway.

    Also: It's fantasy. It's art. We're already breaking about 10,000 rules of science and nature drawing anything like this in the first place so why not slap on some boob if that's what we like? If you DON'T want to, or LIKE the idea of breastless reptilian babes, that's cool, there's nothing wrong with that. Just don't cramp anyone's style if they DO wanna do it, cause there's about a billion reasons it's just as valid as the alternative.

    Well stated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Personally, I like to believe that lizardfolk boobs function similarly to something like a camel's back hump, or a gila monster's tail, in that they store water and nutrients there in case of emergency.

    If people really want a scientifically biological reason for reptilian tits to exist, here ya go.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • meshgear said:
    They're super-developed muscles that help the snakes/lizards open their jaws really far to consume Large Prey so if you honk on their gazongas they'll open their mouth like a trashcan :)

    A vorarephile's ultimate fantasy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • the_average_dingus said:
    Personally, I like to believe that lizardfolk boobs function similarly to something like a camel's back hump, or a gila monster's tail, in that they store water and nutrients there in case of emergency.

    If people really want a scientifically biological reason for reptilian tits to exist, here ya go.

    Venombags (not my idea) and / or meshgear's idea could also be reasons.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • When no horny, you gotta get snack from snake women.

    When horny, you gotta put up an entire dynasty of your children. - idk Heavy or Sun Tzu

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • hip-porcupine said:
    Never forget, anthropomorphism means giving human characteristics. Humans have breasts. Animals that don't classically do the whole titty thing IRL, anthro-fied, = you *can* give them boobs and it's okay and makes sense, as you've supplied human features to them like speech and bipedalism anyway.

    Also: It's fantasy. It's art. We're already breaking about 10,000 rules of science and nature drawing anything like this in the first place so why not slap on some boob if that's what we like? If you DON'T want to, or LIKE the idea of breastless reptilian babes, that's cool, there's nothing wrong with that. Just don't cramp anyone's style if they DO wanna do it, cause there's about a billion reasons it's just as valid as the alternative.

    This. This this this.

    Also, like the bees' knees, tits on a reptile is the sneks' tits.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0