That description was basically just roleplay, there's no visible second character for age_difference, and there's nothing here that shows a hidden vibrator-seems to me she's trembling from fear.

bleph said:
That description was basically just roleplay, there's no visible second character for age_difference, and there's nothing here that shows a hidden vibrator-seems to me she's trembling from fear.

For the "Age Difference" tag I think it's because it's implied that she's being held captive by De.Eggman (the tag on the collar)

workerbeeznuts said:
For the "Age Difference" tag I think it's because it's implied that she's being held captive by De.Eggman (the tag on the collar)

It's always been 'tag what you see' not what is implied.

isabellend said:
It's always been 'tag what you see' not what is implied.

There was no tags relating to implying anything but the description mentioning a copy pasta of a version of the original post somewhere else since the source that still exists didn't had any strangely enough, again, not in the tags, just the text in description, which many posts seemly are allowed to keep in but we got someone to take it off and get off context.
In the tags, I didn't add said tag, and the "younger_female" (since the character IS a younger female character), and a few others were removed and some added as soon as the post was able in less than 4 hours. These tags seemed out of place. Tags were places for what the image contains and nothing else.
Not sure why is it so complicated for these guys to enjoy the post's visuals, to instead go for it and put opinion over protocol when it comes to standard categorization or ignore the little freedom such as having "context" story on a description, which again, several post have and remain there for years untouched, and this one couldn't keep for some opinion over what's stil allowed to have

the_lazy_brownie again, several post have and remain there for years untouched, and this one couldn't keep for some opinion over what's stil allowed to have

A lot of the stuff in that description was justifications for tags that shouldn't really have been on the image. And like... I do actually often add story-esque descriptions to images to give them a little context, but they're descriptions I've pulled from the source by either the artist or commissioner-both of whom would actually know the backstory of the pic and aren't just making something up.

Dagasi drawing Cream? Hell yeah!

Well it is Eggman, I seen the sequel pics, he gives it to her good.

drawzkzeity said:
Dagasi drawing Cream? Hell yeah!

There's a few older ones.. as well as a few new ones from said talented artist

Anybody else notice that he put de.eggman instead of dr.eggman

760854 said:
Anybody else notice that he put de.eggman instead of dr.eggman

I didn't, although you also have the ability to edit tags. That's attention to detail. Thank you

the_lazy_brownie said:
I didn't, although you also have the ability to edit tags. That's attention to detail. Thank you

Yeah my superpower is called adhd

760854 said:
Yeah my superpower is called adhd

Isn't it OCD ?

Dagasi draws Cream in a way that she makes want to fuck her so bad. My fucking god, I'd fuck her even if I'm an asexual.

pokelover88 said:
Dagasi draws Cream in a way that she makes want to fuck her so bad. My fucking god, I'd fuck her even if I'm an asexual.

the_lazy_brownie said:
Aight buddy. We all got feedback in one way or another but try to not make your every comment be so... revealing, this isn't r34 were you practically never get banned, I am not enforcing rules as I have no right to do so. However I recommend you protect your stay here in this site by not being... eeh "creepy". Yeah we know nobody us telling you to actually do so, but in this site comments like that excessively is considered spam and worthy of report and trust me people get perma blocking of sorts and warnings before that. If you wanna say something so daring and liberating like you do recently... Likely do so on the page of the source post, probably the artist will get to actually notice that someone likes their work ...very much, probably, instead of here an archive booru were only a few hundred artists acknowledge the existence of an archive's activity and their works posted in them, they'll probably like the praise in their actual posts and feel motivated, that's what artists want, feedback in one way or another.
Why yes the artistic value, expression, detail and depth is intense, specially on this of art with Cream in it, please take care of your existence as an user here by being a little more considerate of not just the rest but yourself in this "environment", e621 is a bit more friendlier and organized. As one fellow random user to another, I apologize and thank you for patience

I didn't said nothing wrong, IMHO.

pokelover88 said:
I didn't said nothing wrong, IMHO.

I called it post #2651271

the_lazy_brownie said:
I called it post #2651271

Yeah, nothing wrong. You don't like it, block me.

pokelover88 said:
Yeah, nothing wrong. You don't like it, block me.

Oh but it was. We saw the immediate systematic block while you were on effect of it, the warnings too, profile has them listen too now, public info. And you have clearly reduced such behavior afterwards. Thank you for understanding the reprimanded lesson to heart. I simply enjoy when people improve and become a little better. You're fine. Have fine evening

the_lazy_brownie said:
Oh but it was. We saw the immediate systematic block while you were on effect of it, the warnings too, profile has them listen too now, public info. And you have clearly reduced such behavior afterwards. Thank you for understanding the reprimanded lesson to heart. I simply enjoy when people improve and become a little better. You're fine. Have fine evening

Nah, nothing changed.