You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Description

Strip

Having fun at the beach.

  • Comments
  • solarium said:
    Cub or no?

    Could be a flat chested teen. But if it is actually cub, then there's a good chance the artist will get kicked from Furaffinity.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 29
  • jackxano said:
    Could be a flat chested teen. But if it is actually cub, then there's a good chance the artist will get kicked from Furaffinity.

    With that face, definitely looks a bit older then cub. Plus the height of her also lends towards her being teen or older

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • anonthrowawaylurker said:
    I think the “cub” controversy is sort of hilarious. They’re fictional anthropomorphic animal characters, who cares how “old” they are?

    It matters for people who either actively search for it or don't want to see it at all.

    Overall I think this is barely out of young range but I feel it should get the tag to play on the safe side.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 33
  • anonthrowawaylurker said:
    I think the “cub” controversy is sort of hilarious. They’re fictional anthropomorphic animal characters, who cares how “old” they are?

    dragoneer has a lot of problems and this is just one of them.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • jackxano said:
    Could be a flat chested teen. But if it is actually cub, then there's a good chance the artist will get kicked from Furaffinity.

    I don't go on furaffinity often, are cubs not allowed there?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Okay, didn't mean to cause any controversy about this. I don't really see a lot of flat chested characters here on e6. I do believe that this isn't a cub.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • anonthrowawaylurker said:
    I think the “cub” controversy is sort of hilarious. They’re fictional anthropomorphic animal characters, who cares how “old” they are?

    Understandably many find it to be pretty weird and uncomfortable to jack off to a character that is underage which is why the tag exists so people can filter it out easily.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Since the argument seems to still be going on, here's how the tags work:
    young is to be tagged if a character in the image looks young. No other implications, no "it's pedo", it's just to indicate that a character looks young in the image. If you wish to avoid content where young characters are in sexual situations, add this line to your blacklist young -rating:safe, or if you wish to avoid it all just blacklist young.
    Cub gets tagged on images where an anthro or feral (or their in betweens, such as taur) character looks young. Again, there is nothing else to it, but it is a less ideal tag to blacklist because it is rather exclusive (humans, humanoids, and non-animal creatures don't get tagged it, animal humanoids currently included in this list).
    Loli gets tagged where a young female character looks sexualized, or is otherwise in sexual or fetishized imagery. Though blacklisting this tag and shota would be helpful, our intersex genders do not have similar tags for young characters, thus blacklisting these tags won't result in a thorough enough blacklist to avoid all "pedophile" content...

    So, what does this mean for this image? Well, if this character looks young then they do get tagged cub and Loli, and if this character does not look young, they don't get tagged cub and Loli.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • anonthrowawaylurker said:
    I think the “cub” controversy is sort of hilarious. They’re fictional anthropomorphic animal characters, who cares how “old” they are?

    Good tags and a blacklist are the most important things, especially for countries where fictional drawings of an underage character are illegal.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • drfrank3nstein said:
    Hips don't lie, fortunately they're too wide for her to be a cub.

    Read that as “unfortunately” and just sat there like hol up

    omega_lead said:
    This is hilarious! Who needs tv when we have this? If this place didnt have drama it would lose so many members to the point it would be a gallery page with no comments section. And the mids must like the drama too since they havent completely disabled all comments and forums (which would make their lives so easy the mods would have more free time to peruse things in life they actually want to do instead of dealing with drama unless the mods actually enjoy it).

    By disabling all forums and comments, the admins and mods wouldnt have to even deal with any more trolls. I mean if people CANT BEHAVE than why have comments and forums here in the first place. Than all the mods and admins have to do is fix ddos attacks and remove dnp or low quality pictures. Thats all they would have to do. Plus the mods and admins would be getting less attacked by outsiders. Seems like a genius idea that i doubt will be implemented. Now if the admins and mods enjoy the squabbles and fights than they would just keep things exactly the way they are right now which is where i am placing my money (because change is just too hard for modern people).

    I will be coming back to collect my winnings since i expect comments sections and forums to still be up leaving an open door for all the trolls. I mean why close the barn up that store your horses when you can just leave it open and let them run away like how this site has been managed. Whats more effective than disabling all comments? Certainly not playing a game of wack a mole with trolls like the admins and mods insist on doing. That kind of insane thinking is like washing a stretch limo with a tea spoon full of water at a time. Wack a mole tactics accomplish nothing more than pissing time away unless the admins and mods are truely having fun with this drama which might explain a lot.

    Tldr your Dorito fingers belong in a R6 game not a furry porn site

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • bitWolfy

    Former Staff

    edward3468 said:
    not like its gonna help now. there blocked!

    One of them only got a 4 day ban, so they are going to return.
    The other one is gone for good, though. I mean, look at that username.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • jackxano said:
    Could be a flat chested teen. But if it is actually cub, then there's a good chance the artist will get kicked from Furaffinity.

    All her characters are adults

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • spectre110 said:
    All her characters are adults

    Considered that this is the only pic where the character is tagged "young", I agreed

    I think I'll tried fix it

    Edit; Yeah, can't edit it out

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • kibba said:
    Read that as “unfortunately” and just sat there like hol up

    Tldr your Dorito fingers belong in a R6 game not a furry porn site

    Honestly he has a point, why even bother keeping comments on this site? If this site truly is an "art archive" then what reason is there to keep comments? On the other hand why not just make the site like r34.xxx and not even bother with moderating comments? I mean you can even comment anonymously on r34

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Wish the cub and loki tags weren’t locked so they could be remived as none of Jishinu’s characters are underage

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • maskednavajo said:
    Because it's also a website to show off art as much as it is to archive it, and anonymous users are almost guaranteed to be some of the most toxic and vile humans.

    And by taking peoples anonymity away and having moderation, it deterrs them away

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • spectre110 said:
    Wish the cub and loki tags weren’t locked so they could be remived as none of Jishinu’s characters are underage

    Have you read any e6 tagging rules? The most fundamental one is TWYS
    -> It is completely irrelevant what an artist claims their character is (cub/teen/adult/whatever) only what it looks like.

    nova4049 said:
    And by taking peoples anonymity away and having moderation, it deterrs them away

    You don't mean e6 do you? I'm completely anonymous here (Tor etc.) and wouldn't even have created an account if e6 wasn't moderated.
    Afaik the moderation is a reason for quite a few users to be on e6 at all.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • They seem more like a teenager due to the lack of baby fat which alot of kids have, the snouts a little bit more pronounced which usually indicates an older or atleast not too young dog, plus the shape of the body lends itself more towards a more mature age

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0