Now I'm confused, either Nicole is tight enough to cause suction to hold him in (not impossible considering her... Work out regiment in the show) or gumball has barbs we can't see...

That said, it's porn, doesn't need to make sense I guess xD

artskunk_esmebelles said:
Now I'm confused, either Nicole is tight enough to cause suction to hold him in (not impossible considering her... Work out regiment in the show) or gumball has barbs we can't see...

That said, it's porn, doesn't need to make sense I guess xD

Actually, this is a real thing called 'penis captivus' (which, I know, sounds made-up.) Look it up

wigeon said:
Actually, this is a real thing called 'penis captivus' (which, I know, sounds made-up.) Look it up

Huh. Well you learn something new everyday. Even with porn.

wigeon said:
Actually, this is a real thing called 'penis captivus' (which, I know, sounds made-up.) Look it up

Sounds like a spell from Harry Potter. "Penis, CAPTIVUS!"

I think this is the first time I’ve ever seen penis captivus in furry porn, I think there should be more of it because why not there’s already tons of knotting, let’s mix up the formula a little bit

zzorgowl5 said:
According to snopes.com 'penis captivus' is actually fake.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/penis-captivus/

Sounds scarier than Avada Kedavra, though.

The guy who wrote the article, David Mikkelson - I saw some of this other writings. He's unreliable.

zzorgowl5 said:
According to snopes.com 'penis captivus' is actually fake.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/penis-captivus/

Sounds scarier than Avada Kedavra, though.

it is a real thing that can happen, though whether or not it is something that warrants it's own fancy name is debatable. instances are pretty rare, and almost all of then last for only a few minutes at most. basically a glorified muscle cramp.

itwasntme said:
The guy who wrote the article, David Mikkelson - I saw some of this other writings. He's unreliable.

That's one of the founders of Snopes. The current CEO of Snopes. Not saying he's infallible, but to broadly dismiss it with just 'I saw some of his other writings,' is jaw-droppingly ignorant.

I have followed up on the topic and it seems the Snopes article is correct in so far as there are no verifiable records of this having ever occurred, and that the major sources typically cited are fraudulent. That is not the same as saying it has never happened, or cannot happen. But at this point it is firmly in what Snopes defines as Legend status.

itwasntme said:
The guy who wrote the article, David Mikkelson - I saw some of this other writings. He's unreliable.

The entirety of Snopes is unreliable, worse so than wikipedia.