Oct 24th: Did you know that as of this news update, 30.8k posts have been uploaded by 5.2k verified artists? Read our Artist Verification page to learn how to get faster approvals and a verified checkmark on your posts.
Adobe Flash has reached end of life, and no longer works in browsers. Please see this thread on the forum for details on how you can continue to play this file.
Keyboard shortcuts are disabled on this page because it contains flash.
It says vaginal, and at 20s you indeed see the clitoris and urethra, but from the back shot you can't see the backdoor. Would this be a cloaca then? Even if it doesn't have the "average" cloaca appearance?
anguirus12345 said: what's the problem with the file?
Extremely severe dithering artifacting combined with video compression and pillarboxing, then huge overlay watermark for shareware software called BeeCut. I cannot see any reason why any of these should exsist in this upload, especially dithering artifacts as that's bypass of needing to limit colors to 256, which should not be a factor of modern video codecs. As for video editing, I don't see reason to use trials of shady and expensive shareware when you can use fully free tools without any of this nonsense. These are all clearly againts our quality guidelines: "The chosen medium (image, video, flash) needs to be of a high quality."
You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
The real hero
Membernow this is good stuff
Azero
MemberIt says vaginal, and at 20s you indeed see the clitoris and urethra, but from the back shot you can't see the backdoor. Would this be a cloaca then? Even if it doesn't have the "average" cloaca appearance?
erfelessuperriku
MemberIt's probably just flushed with the tail.
anguirus12345
Memberwhat's the problem with the file?
Updated
Mairo
JanitorExtremely severe dithering artifacting combined with video compression and pillarboxing, then huge overlay watermark for shareware software called BeeCut. I cannot see any reason why any of these should exsist in this upload, especially dithering artifacts as that's bypass of needing to limit colors to 256, which should not be a factor of modern video codecs. As for video editing, I don't see reason to use trials of shady and expensive shareware when you can use fully free tools without any of this nonsense.
These are all clearly againts our quality guidelines: "The chosen medium (image, video, flash) needs to be of a high quality."
Login to respond »