Oct 24th: Did you know that as of this news update, 30.8k posts have been uploaded by 5.2k verified artists? Read our Artist Verification page to learn how to get faster approvals and a verified checkmark on your posts.
Adobe Flash has reached end of life, and no longer works in browsers. Please see this thread on the forum for details on how you can continue to play this file.
Keyboard shortcuts are disabled on this page because it contains flash.
knight-fury said: because we are cultured enough to understand, which is something you are not matured of.
That's a really dumb thing to say, plus it doesn't really make sense or help your point. You could have just said "most people on the site are mature enough to separate art from real life" and left it at that. People have already pointed it out to them, there's no reason to keep lampooning them as they clearly had no malicious intent.
I have informed the Japanese embassy of your distaste of unneeded pixelation and annoyingly placed black bars, and they replied with the offer to use the blacklist.
kywtdegenwriter said: Why? 3 answers •This is a site literally filled with furry porn which is not that hard to see.
•The question ask is literally being answered by the tags which is just on the left side of the post, unless you have bad eyesight.
•Almost everyone on this site is matured enough and not ask dumb questions because we are cultured enough to understand, which is something you are not matured of.
In conclusion: Shut up if you got nothing good to say.
hexen said: I have informed the Japanese embassy of your distaste of unneeded pixelation and annoyingly placed black bars, and they replied with the offer to use the blacklist.
But censored isn't something that completely ruins a post It just makes it not as good as it could be I don't like the censoring either but I'm not gonna completely block it cause its still porn
supercastle said: Nice animation, but the censorship is annoying. Japan has the stupidest law in this world.
It was forced on them during the US occupation of Japan, after WW2. By Douglas MacArthur in particular, who was in charge of the press office and heavily anti-porn and anti-sex industry.
It is part of the post-war constitution, and pretty much a case of 'no, we won't rewrite the whole constitution just to get rid of this one stupid law.'
So don't blame it on Japan. The artists clearly don't like it, due to everyone doing only the minimal amount of censoring to obey the letter (but not the spirit) of the law. Complaining about it certainly doesn't help. Artists can't do anything about it, except to stop drawing nsfw altogether. Which is usually what happens when they get tired of the complaints.
This, THIS, is how you draw a fucking catgirl, people! It seriously grinds my gears, chafes my taint, and SIZZLES MY SHIT when characters with animal ears and tails also have HUMAN EARS! The only times this is ok is if the animal ears and tail are fake. But, in the cases where they're real, it's just distracting, rage inducing, and flat out unnecessary! Honestly, how is it so many artists and animators can so easily make such a common and egregious MISTAKE?
genjar said: It was forced on them during the US occupation of Japan, after WW2. By Douglas MacArthur in particular, who was in charge of the press office and heavily anti-porn and anti-sex industry.
It is part of the post-war constitution, and pretty much a case of 'no, we won't rewrite the whole constitution just to get rid of this one stupid law.'
So don't blame it on Japan. The artists clearly don't like it, due to everyone doing only the minimal amount of censoring to obey the letter (but not the spirit) of the law. Complaining about it certainly doesn't help. Artists can't do anything about it, except to stop drawing nsfw altogether. Which is usually what happens when they get tired of the complaints.
useless_pony said: Back to discussing the actual post:
THIS, This is why I approve of genetically engineered (loli)cat-girls for domestic ownership. gives me and those like me something to shower with "love and affection".
It's so hard sometimes to find out why people downvote some comments.
user_425106 said: It's so hard sometimes to find out why people downvote some comments.
some people cant tell when you're being hyperbolic. i ether double down if i think it'll be funny or back out and let it ride if it'll just be annoying.
well if i am not wrong that girl/cat is a bakeneko, a japanese mythic cat which age dosnt play a role with so she can be young like a child or old like a demon of over 10k years. its the way of lokking at it that you see some people see only the small pic not everything and no this is just saying it not meaning it bad
sonfox1992 said: This, THIS, is how you draw a fucking catgirl, people! It seriously grinds my gears, chafes my taint, and SIZZLES MY SHIT when characters with animal ears and tails also have HUMAN EARS! The only times this is ok is if the animal ears and tail are fake. But, in the cases where they're real, it's just distracting, rage inducing, and flat out unnecessary! Honestly, how is it so many artists and animators can so easily make such a common and egregious MISTAKE?
i never draw the human ears on any characters cuz im too lazy tbh so i always draw the hair extra poofy to use as an excuse when someone complains that theres no ears
You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
user 824437
MemberYeah I love everything about this. Great animation!
SirCommentalot
MemberIndeed!!! So good not even the censoring bothers me!
Hexen
MemberThis post literally has three tags answering your question: child, loli and young.
anguirus12345
Memberthe tags rule is "Tag What You See". we don't really know if the character is of legal age, but anyway, the rule should continue.
Alphabetduder
MemberThat's a really dumb thing to say, plus it doesn't really make sense or help your point. You could have just said "most people on the site are mature enough to separate art from real life" and left it at that. People have already pointed it out to them, there's no reason to keep lampooning them as they clearly had no malicious intent.
Hexen
MemberWhat would be the purpose of asking about the character's lore in this case?
lunooky
Memberthis is art
Temeku
MemberThose internal shots are gorgeous
Hexen
MemberI have informed the Japanese embassy of your distaste of unneeded pixelation and annoyingly placed black bars, and they replied with the offer to use the blacklist.
user 800290
Member“Shut up if you got nothing good to say”
Kettle meets pot and calls it black.
Naga6Kiwi
MemberBut censored isn't something that completely ruins a post
It just makes it not as good as it could be
I don't like the censoring either but I'm not gonna completely block it cause its still porn
Rough Draft
MemberCute! Sexy! Good position variety! I like this.
CorndogCrusader
MemberOh my God! This is amazing. It definitely needs sound!
SuperCastle
MemberNice animation, but the censorship is annoying.
Japan has the stupidest law in this world.
Crispycrumpet
MemberThis is not a problem for me. My mind is like an auto edit program that instinctively recreates images from both context and "experience"
emos
Memberit'll be 2050 and we'll still see the same old comments over and over again.
Genjar
Former StaffIt was forced on them during the US occupation of Japan, after WW2. By Douglas MacArthur in particular, who was in charge of the press office and heavily anti-porn and anti-sex industry.
It is part of the post-war constitution, and pretty much a case of 'no, we won't rewrite the whole constitution just to get rid of this one stupid law.'
So don't blame it on Japan. The artists clearly don't like it, due to everyone doing only the minimal amount of censoring to obey the letter (but not the spirit) of the law. Complaining about it certainly doesn't help. Artists can't do anything about it, except to stop drawing nsfw altogether. Which is usually what happens when they get tired of the complaints.
Updated
sonfox1992
MemberThis, THIS, is how you draw a fucking catgirl, people! It seriously grinds my gears, chafes my taint, and SIZZLES MY SHIT when characters with animal ears and tails also have HUMAN EARS! The only times this is ok is if the animal ears and tail are fake. But, in the cases where they're real, it's just distracting, rage inducing, and flat out unnecessary! Honestly, how is it so many artists and animators can so easily make such a common and egregious MISTAKE?
Horsemonger
Memberthis is truth. war ruins everything.
user 425106
MemberIt's so hard sometimes to find out why people downvote some comments.
SovelissFiremane
MemberWar never changes
ThatWunDud
MemberGive this audio and it would be perfect.
useless pony
Membersome people cant tell when you're being hyperbolic. i ether double down if i think it'll be funny or back out and let it ride if it'll just be annoying.
Jimmy Casket
MemberAs a few have said, sound, or even a song to cover teh empty void of audio, would make this twice as good. Gold into Platinum my good sir/madam.
Grazuma
Memberwell if i am not wrong that girl/cat is a bakeneko, a japanese mythic cat which age dosnt play a role with so she can be young like a child or old like a demon of over 10k years.
its the way of lokking at it that you see some people see only the small pic not everything and no this is just saying it not meaning it bad
MeltyMoon
Memberi never draw the human ears on any characters cuz im too lazy tbh so i always draw the hair extra poofy to use as an excuse when someone complains that theres no ears
please58
Memberthis is beautiful animation, her expressions are so cute. love this
Dread Yalin
MemberI read this in cell's voice, because of your pfp... I don't have regrets.
Login to respond »