You can not view this image.

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • beantrader904 said:
    Is she 18+?

    Why downvote? Its a plain old simple question or are the stans of this stuff angry at me for asking a question?

    hexen said:
    This post literally has three tags answering your question: child, loli and young.

    the tags rule is "Tag What You See". we don't really know if the character is of legal age, but anyway, the rule should continue.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 17
  • knight-fury said:
    because we are cultured enough to understand, which is something you are not matured of.

    That's a really dumb thing to say, plus it doesn't really make sense or help your point. You could have just said "most people on the site are mature enough to separate art from real life" and left it at that. People have already pointed it out to them, there's no reason to keep lampooning them as they clearly had no malicious intent.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 45
  • parthurnaxs said:
    censored sooo fucking stupid

    I have informed the Japanese embassy of your distaste of unneeded pixelation and annoyingly placed black bars, and they replied with the offer to use the blacklist.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • kywtdegenwriter said:
    Why? 3 answers
    •This is a site literally filled with furry porn which is not that hard to see.

    •The question ask is literally being answered by the tags which is just on the left side of the post, unless you have bad eyesight.

    •Almost everyone on this site is matured enough and not ask dumb questions because we are cultured enough to understand, which is something you are not matured of.

    In conclusion: Shut up if you got nothing good to say.

    “Shut up if you got nothing good to say”

    Kettle meets pot and calls it black.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 21
  • hexen said:
    I have informed the Japanese embassy of your distaste of unneeded pixelation and annoyingly placed black bars, and they replied with the offer to use the blacklist.

    But censored isn't something that completely ruins a post
    It just makes it not as good as it could be
    I don't like the censoring either but I'm not gonna completely block it cause its still porn

  • Reply
  • |
  • 16
  • supercastle said:
    Nice animation, but the censorship is annoying.
    Japan has the stupidest law in this world.

    This is not a problem for me. My mind is like an auto edit program that instinctively recreates images from both context and "experience"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    supercastle said:
    Nice animation, but the censorship is annoying.
    Japan has the stupidest law in this world.

    It was forced on them during the US occupation of Japan, after WW2. By Douglas MacArthur in particular, who was in charge of the press office and heavily anti-porn and anti-sex industry.

    It is part of the post-war constitution, and pretty much a case of 'no, we won't rewrite the whole constitution just to get rid of this one stupid law.'

    So don't blame it on Japan. The artists clearly don't like it, due to everyone doing only the minimal amount of censoring to obey the letter (but not the spirit) of the law. Complaining about it certainly doesn't help. Artists can't do anything about it, except to stop drawing nsfw altogether. Which is usually what happens when they get tired of the complaints.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 20
  • This, THIS, is how you draw a fucking catgirl, people! It seriously grinds my gears, chafes my taint, and SIZZLES MY SHIT when characters with animal ears and tails also have HUMAN EARS! The only times this is ok is if the animal ears and tail are fake. But, in the cases where they're real, it's just distracting, rage inducing, and flat out unnecessary! Honestly, how is it so many artists and animators can so easily make such a common and egregious MISTAKE?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • genjar said:
    It was forced on them during the US occupation of Japan, after WW2. By Douglas MacArthur in particular, who was in charge of the press office and heavily anti-porn and anti-sex industry.

    It is part of the post-war constitution, and pretty much a case of 'no, we won't rewrite the whole constitution just to get rid of this one stupid law.'

    So don't blame it on Japan. The artists clearly don't like it, due to everyone doing only the minimal amount of censoring to obey the letter (but not the spirit) of the law. Complaining about it certainly doesn't help. Artists can't do anything about it, except to stop drawing nsfw altogether. Which is usually what happens when they get tired of the complaints.

    this is truth. war ruins everything.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • useless_pony said:
    Back to discussing the actual post:

    THIS, This is why I approve of genetically engineered (loli)cat-girls for domestic ownership. gives me and those like me something to shower with "love and affection".

    It's so hard sometimes to find out why people downvote some comments.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • user_425106 said:
    It's so hard sometimes to find out why people downvote some comments.

    some people cant tell when you're being hyperbolic. i ether double down if i think it'll be funny or back out and let it ride if it'll just be annoying.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • As a few have said, sound, or even a song to cover teh empty void of audio, would make this twice as good. Gold into Platinum my good sir/madam.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • well if i am not wrong that girl/cat is a bakeneko, a japanese mythic cat which age dosnt play a role with so she can be young like a child or old like a demon of over 10k years.
    its the way of lokking at it that you see some people see only the small pic not everything and no this is just saying it not meaning it bad

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • sonfox1992 said:
    This, THIS, is how you draw a fucking catgirl, people! It seriously grinds my gears, chafes my taint, and SIZZLES MY SHIT when characters with animal ears and tails also have HUMAN EARS! The only times this is ok is if the animal ears and tail are fake. But, in the cases where they're real, it's just distracting, rage inducing, and flat out unnecessary! Honestly, how is it so many artists and animators can so easily make such a common and egregious MISTAKE?

    i never draw the human ears on any characters cuz im too lazy tbh so i always draw the hair extra poofy to use as an excuse when someone complains that theres no ears

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1