You can not view this image.

Parent: post #2626398 that has 3 siblings (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Trainer: “Fuck you”.
    Eevee: “Alright~!”.
    That’s the only thing I can imagine with this image haha. It looks very cute!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 30
  • t-machine said:
    While the edit of all pictures together haven't been posted before, in terms of quality this one is far inferior to the original set of images.
    UPD: Now, before you show how much you dislike what I said, consider that this combined picture has it's size cut off (as every original picture has a 600x600 size) and it has far reduced quality with heavy visual compression compared to originals. What I'm saying is, considering that you literally can stitch together existing contributions together in paint and have way better quality, this particular post doesn't deserve to be here. Hell, I'll stitch the better version myself for you, guys, if this one is gonna get approved.

    This looks like a copy pasta lmao

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • t-machine said:
    While the edit of all pictures together haven't been posted before, in terms of quality this one is far inferior to the original set of images.
    UPD: Now, before you show how much you dislike what I said, consider that this combined picture has it's size cut off (as every original picture has a 600x600 size) and it has far reduced quality with heavy visual compression compared to originals. What I'm saying is, considering that you literally can stitch together existing contributions together in paint and have way better quality, this particular post doesn't deserve to be here. Hell, I'll stitch the better version myself for you, guys, if this one is gonna get approved.

    I am... Confused as to why this is so heavily downvoted. This comment is correct, both in regards to the resolution, and the jpeg artifacting. In addition, the criticism was pretty mild, considering the amount of time it would take to put together something without these issues.

    Unless there is something I am missing, I find the negative reaction kind of baffling.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Quenir said:

    t-machine said:While the edit of all pictures together haven't been posted before, in terms of quality this one is far inferior to the original set of images.: Now, before you show how much you dislike what I said, consider that this combined picture has it's size cut off (as every original picture has a 600x600 size) and it has far reduced quality with heavy visual compression compared to originals. What I'm saying is, considering that you literally can stitch together existing contributions together in paint and have way better quality, this particular post doesn't deserve to be here. Hell, I'll stitch the better version myself for you, guys, if this one is gonna get approved.

    I am... Confused as to why this is so heavily downvoted. This comment is correct, both in regards to the resolution, and the jpeg artifacting. In addition, the criticism was pretty mild, considering the amount of time it would take to put together something without these issues.Unless there is something I am missing, I find the negative reaction kind of baffling.

    There are a bunch of fools who will downvote without understanding, and if they see some amount of downvotes on any comments, they typically downvote it further via herd mentality.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • quenir said:
    I am... Confused as to why this is so heavily downvoted. This comment is correct, both in regards to the resolution, and the jpeg artifacting. In addition, the criticism was pretty mild, considering the amount of time it would take to put together something without these issues.

    Unless there is something I am missing, I find the negative reaction kind of baffling.

    The truth is painful to people like them and they'd rather try and hide or destroy it rather than accept reality.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1