Viewing sample resized to 47% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

I forgot to update this file here, sorry guys
----
[+18 Release(VIDEO+SOUND)]
The real battle we always wanted to see! ❤️
___

Angewomon's VA
https://twitter.com/MizzPeachy

LadyDevimon's VA
https://twitter.com/ZeroDiamonds

Sound Design
https://twitter.comVolkorNSFW

Music
https://Akaruhime.newgrounds.com/

  • Comments
  • feelthesun said:
    Digimon can be humans?

    Only watched the first 3 or so seasons, but... kinda.

    From what i can tell most Digimon have a basic appearance that looks similar to some animal, plant or other minor mythological creature such as a goblin or something.

    When a Digimon is tied to a... "Digivice" I think they're called? As well as partnered with a human, they can learn to "Digivolve". Think Pokémon evolution but it's a temporary power boost and they transform back into their more base forms when they're done fighting.

    A lot of late stage Digimon evolutions are fairly humanoid in appearance, often resembling things such as angels, devils, kitsune, witches and so on.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • The hawtest act in lesbian sex ending with squirting with sexy VAs from one of my absolute favorite lewd animators? Yeah, today is a good day!

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • This post is pending approval. (learn more)
    It has been reviewed by 2 approvers. 2 believe it isn't relevant.

    Ladydevimon AND Angewomon are tags here, but the reviewers say "NOT RELEVANT"?
    HOW?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • crazyt said:
    Ladydevimon AND Angewomon are tags here, but the reviewers say "NOT RELEVANT"?
    HOW?

    Human-appearing characters/species are relevant if there's an animal/anthro in the image focus
    post #491293

    Or they can be drawn less-human or combined with another character/species
    post #2364476 post #2900199

    There's a lot of posts where it's a lot more obvious than this Angewomon has wings, but I'm just saying the existence of a tag doesn't make a character automatically relevant.
    We're almost at 200 posts for solid_snake

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • magnuseffect said:
    Human-appearing characters are relevant if there's an animal/anthro in the image focus
    post #491293

    Or they can be drawn less-human or combined with another character
    post #2364476 post #2900199

    There's a lot of posts where it's a lot more obvious than this Angewomon has wings, but I'm just saying the existence of a tag doesn't make a character automatically relevant.
    We're almost at 200 posts for solid_snake

    shouldn't they remove most of the angewomon pics then? I wanted this approved because it's good and nobody posted the source.
    https://e621.net/posts/3139151?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/3110610?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/3109246?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/3087870?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/2977252?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/2834628?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/2785613?q=angewomon
    https://e621.net/posts/2568628?q=angewomon

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • But i want to remind ya the focus on the site isn't just furries it non humans in general. and they are digimon based on angels and demons which have tons of art here. They aren't human.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • manyura said:
    shouldn't they remove most of the angewomon pics then? I wanted this approved because it's good and nobody posted the source.

    Well here's an alternate source
    A lot of the time artist-uploaders don't bother posting links to elsewhere..

    Sometimes approver decisions just aren't totally consistent, and in most of those posts the wings are more obviously wings. Quite notably different approvers have completely different standards.
    Also two of those were posted by someone with unrestricted uploads so they bypassed approval entirely. (Something I pointed out as concerning back when people were arguing about whether Among Us porn was site-relevant)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • magnuseffect said:
    Well here's an alternate source
    A lot of the time artist-uploaders don't bother posting links to elsewhere..

    Sometimes approver decisions just aren't totally consistent, and in most of those posts the wings are more obviously wings. Quite notably different approvers have completely different standards.
    Also two of those were posted by someone with unrestricted uploads so they bypassed approval entirely. (Something I pointed out as concerning back when people were arguing about whether Among Us porn was site-relevant)

    I see well we almost had the best animated porn for both these two on the site

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I’m not sure how to word this but very hot, much enjoyed, and this art style is very cool, I’d like to know how to draw it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0