no fair...that's mean.

Hehe, I just thought of something.

Before this image there was an edit of a real porn image edit of a pussy...but 44 people faved that....and before the image was trashed I put this original as the parent.

So, all the favs went to this image. Now I cant help but think people are going to freak out when they noticed the pussy they faved is now a penis... :> *evil laugh* Bwhahahaha...

If only I could see their faces when they notice lol

Conker said:
Hehe, I just thought of something.

Before this image there was an edit of a real porn image edit of a pussy...but 44 people faved that....and before the image was trashed I put this original as the parent.

So, all the favs went to this image. Now I cant help but think people are going to freak out when they noticed the pussy they faved is now a penis... :> *evil laugh* Bwhahahaha...

If only I could see their faces when they notice lol

Why was the other one deleted then

Lieutenant_Cupcakes said:
Why was the other one deleted then

Someone edited out the penis, took a photo of someone's pussy and pasted it over it. Real porn isnt allow here even if its in edits. 44 people faved it, and I uploaded the unedited one as the parent. The porn edit got deleted soo all the favs went to this one.

Conker said:
Someone edited out the penis, took a photo of someone's pussy and pasted it over it. Real porn isnt allow here even if its in edits. 44 people faved it, and I uploaded the unedited one as the parent. The porn edit got deleted soo all the favs went to this one.

not...smart enough..to...follow what you're sayinnnnnnng...

Imaderule34 said:
not...smart enough..to...follow what you're sayinnnnnnng...

Someone took this image, replaced the cock with a real photo of a pussy for an edit. People faved the porn edit, this was uploaded and put as the parent for it. Thew pussy edit got deleted....all the favs for the edit of the pussy now turn to this image of the dick. Get it now?

Conker said:
Someone took this image, replaced the cock with a real photo of a pussy for an edit. People faved the porn edit, this was uploaded and put as the parent for it. Thew pussy edit got deleted....all the favs for the edit of the pussy now turn to this image of the dick. Get it now?

oh ok yeah. lol yeah that would suck...for them.

Does a lick count as touching?

Adding "male" tag and removing "dickgirl" and "intersex" tags, as there are no visible breasts.

but i want it!

ketsuki_shine said:
Adding "male" tag and removing "dickgirl" and "intersex" tags, as there are no visible breasts.

What are you, ignit? You don't need to see the breasts to realise it's transgender.

Terrum said:
What are you, ignit? You don't need to see the breasts to realise it's transgender.

Thats not how things work around here, we use "tag what you see" not what you know. In this image it could be a girly male.

Conker said:
Thats not how things work around here, we use "tag what you see" not what you know. In this image it could be a girly male.

"Tag what you see"? Let's talk about "Corruption of Champions".
(Just joking)

Janek500 said:
"Tag what you see"? Let's talk about "Corruption of Champions".
(Just joking)

lol on a related note...
The new CoC has images now :o sooo yeah...lol

Conker said:
Thats not how things work around here, we use "tag what you see" not what you know. In this image it could be a girly male.

I see now, my apologies. Whilst I don't really understand how that rule works (when it's quite obviously a female in that picture), I can understand that's not how the tagging works - apologies if I caused any harm.

Terrum said:
I see now, my apologies. Whilst I don't really understand how that rule works (when it's quite obviously a female in that picture), I can understand that's not how the tagging works - apologies if I caused any harm.

It's not obviously female. Not obvious at all. I know many people born with just a penis in real life, who have not taken estrogen pills or had surgery, who look completely female with just long hair, a shave, light makeup, and girly clothing. I know females who can look male in the opposite way, as well.

Terrum said:
I see now, my apologies. Whilst I don't really understand how that rule works (when it's quite obviously a female in that picture), I can understand that's not how the tagging works - apologies if I caused any harm.

Problem is, it's not obvious. In this picture alone, we see anus, taint, and ballsack. Feminine character, for sure, but no vagina, no breasts, and nothing other than "feminine" qualities to the face in the picture itself. And it's easy for someone to be male, but seem very very female, and vice versa. And while we know that AppleJack is normally a female character, and while we know that other child/parent posts of this image portray her as a dickgirl, we don't tag what we KNOW- we tag what we SEE. Make sense?

That way, say, someone has dickgirl blacklisted. But they like the idea of a feminine male, a femboy. This image alone is something they might possibly enjoy. There are no breasts or any other indication that this character is anything but a feminine male :) So, while it may be confusing, or seem silly, the "Tag what you see!" rule allows for more content to be viewed by more people, purely from an image to image standpoint.

I want to sack